1. South Africa Department of Health, South African Medical Research Council and MEASURE DHS+, South Africa Demographic and Health Survey, 1998: Full Report, Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Health, 2002.
2. U.S. Bureau of the Census, International data base country summary: South Africa, <http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idb/country/sfportal.html>, accessed Mar. 24, 2008.
3. Burgard S, Factors associated with contraceptive use in late- and post-apartheid South Africa, Studies in Family Planning, 2004, 35(2): 91–104.
4. Swartz L, Expert group meeting on completing the fertility transition, paper presented at the Conference on Fertility and the Current South African Issues of Poverty, HIV/AIDS and Youth, Pretoria, South Africa, Oct. 24, 2002.
5. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, South Africa: country situation analysis, <http://www.unaids.org/en/Country Responses/Countries/south_africa.asp>, accessed Feb. 11, 2008.
6. Maharaj P and Cleland J, Women on top: the relative influence of wives and husbands on contraceptive use in KwaZulu-Natal, Journal of Women and Health, 2005, 41(2):31–41.
7. Myer L et al., Dual method use in South Africa, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2002, 28(2):119–121.
8. Stephenson RB et al., Contextual influences on modern contraceptive use in Sub-Saharan Africa, American Journal of Public Health, 2007, 97(7):1233–1240.
9. Stephenson RB and Tsui AO, Contextual influences on reproductive health service use in Uttar Pradesh, India, Studies in Family Planning, 2002, 33(4):309–320.
10. Bruce J, Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework, Studies in Family Planning, 1990, 21(2):61–91.
11. Mark KE et al., Contraception among HIV concordant and discordant couples in Zambia: a randomized controlled trial, Journal of Women's Health, 2007, 16(8):1200–1210.
12. Lindsay MK et al., The impact of knowledge of human immuno-de-ficiency virus serostatus on contraceptive choice and repeat pregnancy, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1995, 85(5 Pt. 1):675–679.
13. King R et al., A family planning intervention to reduce vertical transmission of HIV in Rwanda, AIDS, 1995, 9(Suppl. 1):45–51.
14. Baylies C, The impact of HIV on family size preference in Zimbabwe, Reproductive Health Matters, 2000, 8(15):77–86.
15. Link BG and Phelan J, Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1995, 35(Suppl.):80–94.
16. Halloran ME and Struchiner CJ, Study designs for dependent happenings, Epidemiology, 1991, 2(5):331–338.
17. Koopman JS and Longini IM, Jr., The ecological effects of individual exposures and nonlinear disease dynamics in populations, American Journal of Public Health, 1994, 84(5):836–842.
18. Grady WR, Klepinger DH and Billy JOG, The influence of community characteristics on the practice of effective contraception, Family Planning Perspectives, 1993, 25(1):4–11.
19. Chacko E, Women's use of contraception in rural India: a village-level study, Health and Place, 2001, 7(3):197–208.
20. Magadi MA, Madise NJ and Rodrigues RN, Frequency and timing of antenatal care in Kenya: explaining the variations between women of different communities, Social Science & Medicine, 2000, 51(4):551– 561.
21. Pebley AR, Goldman N and Rodriguez G, Prenatal and delivery care and childhood immunization: do family and community matter? Demography, 1996, 33(2):213–247.
22. Von Korff M et al., Multilevel research in epidemiologic research on health behaviors and outcomes, American Journal of Epidemiology, 1992, 135(10):1077–1082.
23. Diez-Roux AV, Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health, American Journal of Public Health, 2001, 91(11):1783–1789.
24. Stokols D, Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: toward a social ecology of health promotion, American Psychologist, 1992, 47(1):6–22.
25. Duncan C, Jones K and Moon G, Context, composition and heterogeneity: using multilevel models in health research, Social Science & Medicine, 1998, 46(1):97–117.
26. Goldstein H, Multilevel Statistical Methods, London: Arnold, 2003.
27. DiPrete TA and Forristal JD, Multilevel models: methods and substance, Annual Review of Sociology, 1994, 20:331–357.
28. Stephenson RB and Tsui AO, Contextual influences on reproductive wellness in northern India, American Journal of Public Health, 2003, 93(11):1820–1829.
29. Entwisle B et al., Community and contraceptive choice in rural Thailand: a case study of Nang Rong, Demography, 1996, 33(1):1–11.
30. Tuoane M, Diamond I and Madise N, Use of family planning services in Lesotho: the importance of quality of care and access, African Population Studies, 2003, 18(2):105–132.
31. Bongaarts J and Bruce J, The causes of unmet need for contraception and the social content of services, Studies in Family Planning, 1995, 26(2):57–75.
32. Tsui AO and Ochoa LH, Service proximity as a determinant of contraceptive behaviour: evidence from cross-national studies of survey data, in: Phillips JF and Ross JA, eds., Family Planning Programmes and Fertility, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1992.
33. Oliver R, Contraceptive use in Ghana: the role of service availability, quality and price, Living Standards Measurement Study Working Papers, Washington, DC: World Bank, 1995, No. 111.
34. Hamid S and Stephenson RB, Provider and health facility influences on contraceptive adoption in urban Pakistan, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2006, 32(2):71–78.
35. Katende C, Gupta N and Bessinger R, Facility-level reproductive health interventions and contraceptive use in Uganda, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2003, 29(3):130–137.
36. RamaRao S et al., The link between quality of care and contraceptive use, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2003, 29(2):76–83.
37. Seiber E and Bertrand J, Access as a factor in differential contraceptive use between Mayans and Ladinos in Guatemala, Health Policy and Planning, 2002, 17(2):167–177.
38. Magnani RJ et al., The impact of the family planning supply environment on contraceptive intentions and use in Morocco, Studies in Family Planning, 1999, 30(2):120–132.
39. Steele F, Curtis SL and Choe M, The impact of family planning service provision on contraceptive use dynamics in Morocco, Studies in Family Planning, 1999, 30(1):28–42.
40. Blanc AK, Curtis SL and Croft TN, Monitoring contraceptive continuation: links to fertility outcomes and quality of care, Studies in Family Planning, 2002, 33(2):127–140.
41. DeGraff D, Bilsborrow RE and Guilkey DK, Community-level determinants of contraceptive use in the Philippines: a structural analysis, Demography, 1997, 34(3):385–398.
42. National Research Council, Factors Affecting Contraceptive Use in Sub-Saharan Africa, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1993.
43. Nazzar A et al., Developing a culturally appropriate family planning program for the Navrongo experiment, Studies in Family Planning, 1995, 26(6):307–324.
44. Diez-Roux AV, Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis, American Journal of Public Health, 1998, 88(2):216–222.
45. Saha T, The Effect of Settlement Zones and Economic Diversity on Reproductive Behaviour in West Africa: West Africa Spatial Analysis Prototype Exploratory Analysis, Calverton, MD, USA: Macro International, 1998.
46. Entwisle B, Casterline JB and Sayed AA, Villages as contexts for contraceptive behavior in rural Egypt, American Sociological Review, 1989, 54(6):1019–1034.
47. Entwisle B and Mason WM, Multilevel effects of socioeconomic development and family planning programs on children ever born, American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91(3):616–649.
48. Nsemuklia GB et al., A Study of Factors Associated with Maternal Mortality in 1998, Lusaka, Zambia: Ministry of Health, United Nations Population Fund, Central Board of Health and University of Zambia, 1999.
49. Mahlalela X et al., Primary Health Care in the Eastern Cape Province 1997–2000, Bisho, South Africa: EQUITY Project, Department of Health and Management Sciences for Health, 2001.
50. Van Rensberg D et al., Primary health care facilities survey, in: Ntuli A, ed., South African Health Review 2000, Durban, South Africa: Health Systems Trust, 2001.
51. MEASURE Evaluation and EQUITY Project, 1998 South African Demographic and Health Survey Report for Eastern Cape Province, Bisho, South Africa: EQUITY Project, Department of Health and Management Sciences for Health, 2004.
52. MLwiN, computer program, Centre for Multilevel Modelling, <http://www.cmm.bristol.ac.uk/MLwiN/index.shtml>, accessed May 24, 2007.
53. Blakely TA and Woodward AJ, Ecological effects in multi-level studies, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 2000, 54(5):367– 374.
54. Angeles G, Guilkey DK and Mroz TA, Purposive program placement and the estimation of family planning program effects in Tanzania, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1998, 93(443): 884–899.
55. Gertler PJ and Molyneaux JW, How economic development and family planning programs combined to reduce Indonesian fertility, Demography, 1994, 31(1):33–63.
56. Pitt MM, Rosenzweig MR and Gibbons DM, The determinants and consequences of the placement of government programs in Indonesia, World Bank Economic Review, 1993, 7(3):319–348.
57. Gready M et al., South African women's experiences of contraception and contraceptive services, in: Ravindran S, Berer M and Cottingham J, eds., Beyond Acceptability: Users' Perspectives on Contraception, Geneva: Reproductive Health Matters for the World Health Organization, 1997.