
California
May 2012
MEDICAID AND THE U.S. FAMILY PLANNING EFFORT
Medicaid is the financial cornerstone of the U.S. family planning effort, providing insurance coverage, including coverage for family planning, for 15% of reproductive age women and 38% of poor women in that age-group. Medicaid spent nearly $1.8 billion on family planning services in FY 2010, amounting to 75% of all public family planning spending. That national investment in family planning has a substantial impact: without these services, unintended pregnancy and abortion would be nearly two-thirds higher.
Medicaid and the U.S. Family Planning Effort
United States: Need, Impact and Importance
Family planning services are vital: Women who are not using contraceptives, or who are using them inconsistently, represent one-third of all women at risk of unintended pregnancy but account for 95% all unintended pregnancies.(1) Unintended pregnancy and inadequate pregnancy spacing, in turn, have been linked with numerous negative maternal and child health outcomes. In addition, women’s ability to rely on contraception enables them to invest in higher education and to be full participants in the nation’s workforce.(2)
Publicly funded family planning services in the United States helped serve more than nine million female contraceptive clients in 2006.(1) They helped women and couples avoid 1.94 million unintended pregnancies, which would have resulted in 860,000 unplanned births and 810,000 abortions. Without these services, unintended pregnancy and abortion in the United States would be nearly two-thirds higher. And by helping women avoid unintended pregnancies, the services provided by publicly supported family planning centers saved taxpayers $5.1 billion in 2008, amounting to nearly $4 saved for every $1 spent providing contraceptive care.(3)
Medicaid is central to the U.S. family planning effort. In 2010, 15% of women of reproductive age (15–44) relied on Medicaid, as did 38% of poor women in that age-group.(4) Federal law since the early 1970s has required that family planning services and supplies be covered for all program enrollees and that those services be exempt from any type of patient cost-sharing, such as copayments. The federal government reimburses the states for 90% of Medicaid family planning expenditures, a considerably higher rate than for most other services (50–75%, depending on the state). In addition, more than half of states have expanded Medicaid eligibility specifically for family planning services to women and men who do not qualify for the broader Medicaid program.(5) Altogether, although family planning constitutes only about one-half of 1% of all Medicaid expenditures, it is the financial cornerstone of the publicly funded family planning effort: Medicaid spent nearly $1.8 billion on family planning services in FY 2010, amounting to 75% of all public family planning spending.(6)

California: The Need for Family Planning Services
• In 2008, 2,373,500 women in California were in need of publicly supported contraceptive services and supplies.(3) (These are women who are sexually active; are aged 13–44; are able to become pregnant but are not pregnant, postpartum nor trying to become pregnant; and either have a family income below 250% of the federal poverty level or are younger than age 20.)
• In 2006, 513,000 California residents had an unintended pregnancy, for a rate of 66 per 1,000 women aged 15–44.(7) Births resulting from these unintended pregnancies cost the state and federal governments $1,346 million that year.(8)
• In 2007, 220,840 California residents obtained abortions, for a rate of 28.3 per 1,000 women aged 15–44, compared with 19.4 per 1,000 nationally.(9)
• In 2005, there were 96,490 pregnancies among California teens aged 15–19, for a rate of 75 pregnancies per 1,000 teen women, compared with 70 per 1,000 nationally.(10)
• In 2009, there were 47,831 births among California teens aged 15–19, for a rate of 36.6 births per 1,000 teen women, compared with 39 per 1,000 nationally.(11,12)
California: The Impact of Publicly Funded Services
• In 2008, contraceptive services provided at publicly funded centers in California helped women avoid 317,900 unintended pregnancies, which would have resulted in 141,300 births and 132,700 abortions.(3)
• In the absence of these services, the number of unintended pregnancies in California would be 52% higher, and the number of abortions would be 60% higher.(13)
• In 2006, contraceptive services provided at publicly funded centers in California helped 55,041 women younger than age 20 avoid an unintended pregnancy.(14)
• In the absence of these services, the number of teen pregnancies in California would be 57% higher.(13)
• By helping women avoid unintended pregnancies and the births that would follow, the services provided at publicly supported centers in California saved $924 million in public funds in 2008.(3)
California: The Importance of Medicaid
• In 2009–2010, 1,279,800 women of reproductive age were enrolled in Medicaid, accounting for 17% of women in that age-group.(4)
• Medicaid provides critical support to the network of 1,008 family planning centers that serve 1,530,200 women in California.(3,15)
• The federal government and California together spent $518.9 million on family planning services for women enrolled in the state’s Medicaid program in FY 2010. That amounts to 86% of all public funding for family planning in California.(6)
• Medicaid’s role is slated to expand in the near future, as a result of the federal health reform legislation enacted in 2010. After expansion, 56% of currently uninsured women aged 18–64, amounting to roughly 1,486,000 women, are projected to be eligible for Medicaid in 2014, when all states will be required to cover individuals up to 133% of poverty.(16)
MEDICAID FAMILY PLANNING ELIGIBILITY EXPANSIONS
Since the mid-1990s, 24 states have initiated broad income-based expansion programs providing family planning services under Medicaid to people with incomes well above the cut-off for Medicaid eligibility overall. Together, these programs have helped reduce levels of unprotected sex, increase use of more-effective contraceptive methods and improve continuity of contraceptive use. Improved contraceptive use has translated into measurable declines in unintended and teen pregnancy, and improvements in women’s ability to space their pregnancies.
Medicaid Family Planning Eligibility Expansions
United States: Family Planning Expansions
Since the mid-1990s, 24 states have initiated broad income-based expansion programs providing family planning services under Medicaid to women (and, in some states, men) with incomes well above the cut-off for Medicaid eligibility overall and regardless of whether they meet other requirements for Medicaid coverage, such as being a low-income parent.(5) States have usually sought to match the eligibility level they have set for pregnant women under Medicaid, typically 185% or 200% of the federal poverty level. Five additional states have implemented more limited expansions for individuals losing full-benefit Medicaid coverage (most often after giving birth).
Initially, states seeking to initiate this type of expansion were required to receive federal approval under a long and complicated process known as a “waiver.” Because evaluations over nearly two decades showed these temporary demonstration programs have clear health benefits and generate significant government cost-savings, Congress included a groundbreaking provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 designed to facilitate states’ adoption of an expansion program.(17) Under that new authority, known as a State Plan Amendment, a state may set the eligibility level for family planning up to the highest level for pregnant women in place under Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program; the state may not exclude individuals based on age or gender. The provision also greatly simplifies the process for a state seeking to implement an expansion program and allows the program to be permanent (rather than having to be renewed periodically, as is the case for waivers).
States’ long experience in implementing these programs has made it clear that, to maximize its impact, a program must make serious efforts to ensure that potential clients learn about the program.(17) To reach out to new clients, state agencies have established program Web sites and telephone hotlines, linked up with other health and social services programs, and used tailored messages and tactics to reach young adults, Latinas and other groups in need.
States have also taken a number of steps to streamline enrollment.(17) For example, they have used tactics such as simplifying application forms, offering online applications, using databases to verify citizenship status and income, automatically enrolling certain groups of potential clients, and facilitating applications and enrollment at the point of service.
Collectively, the income-based Medicaid expansion programs spent $626 million on family planning services in FY 2010.(6) The limited expansion programs spent $3.7 million that year. Together, spending under the expansions constitutes 36% of total Medicaid family planning expenditures in the United States. These programs serve about 2.7 million clients over the course of a year.(17)
According to state and federal evaluations and independent studies, the programs have expanded the network of family planning providers and increased their capacity to meet the need for services.(17) The services provided have helped reduce levels of unprotected sex, increase use of more-effective contraceptive methods and improve continuity of contraceptive use. They have also expanded access to related preventive care, such as screening for STIs and cervical cancer. Improved contraceptive use has translated into measurable declines in unintended and teen pregnancy, and improvements in women’s ability to space their pregnancies. In the process, the expansions have substantially reduced federal and state Medicaid expenditures on unplanned pregnancy.

California: Family Planning Expansions
• California has used the State Plan Amendment authority to implement a permanent Medicaid family planning expansion that serves individuals with income up to 200% of the federal poverty level, regardless of age or gender.(5)
• In 2010, the most recent program year for which data are available, this expansion program served 1,820,850 individuals.(17)
• In FY 2010, the federal government and California together spent $423.6 million on family planning client services under the state’s Medicaid family planning expansion. That amounts to 82% of the state’s total Medicaid family planning expenditures.(6)
• The Medicaid family planning expansion program in California makes use of the following techniques for streamlining enrollment:(17)
| The program uses simplified application forms—typically one or two pages—that can be filled out quickly and require less information than standard Medicaid applications. | |
| The program allows applicants to start or complete the process remotely, by mail, fax or telephone or on the Internet, and without requiring an in-person interview. | |
| The state uses simultaneous application or screening for the family planning expansion and for other public programs, such as other types of health care coverage. | |
| The state uses state, federal or private databases to verify applicants’ information related to citizenship. | |
| The state uses state, federal or private databases to verify applicants’ information related to income. | |
| The state helps clients meet citizenship documentation requirements by obtaining birth certificates for applicants born out of state. | |
| The program has eliminated the application process entirely for certain groups of individuals losing full Medicaid coverage, by automatically enrolling them in the family planning expansion program. | |
| The program allows family planning providers to verify at the point of service documents for applications submitted by mail, phone or the Internet. | |
| The program allows clients to complete and submit an application at the point of service. | |
| The program reimburses family planning providers for assisting clients in the application process. |
• Evaluations of the Medicaid family planning expansion in California have shown that the program has had an impact:(17)
Access to services: According to a state-commissioned evaluation report, California’s expansion has helped expand the family planning provider network beyond public-sector clinics. Private-sector providers accounted for 58% of the program’s network in 2009–2010; however, because public-sector clinics tend to serve greater volumes of family planning clients than do private-sector providers, those private providers served only 32% of clients under the expansion program.(22)
Contraceptive use: According to another evaluation report from 2007, clients who were new to California’s expansion program were more likely to use a contraceptive method after they were served than before enrolling in the program, with use increasing from 67% to 89%; the effect was particularly pronounced among new adolescent clients, among whom use increased from 57% to 93%.(23)
Contraceptive use: That same 2007 evaluation report found that the proportion of new expansion clients in California using more-effective methods (hormonal methods, IUDs and sterilization) increased from 28% before enrollment to 50% after their first office visit. Women were more than twice as likely to switch to a more-effective method if their visit included counseling about their contraceptive options.(23)
Contraceptive use: Another state-commissioned evaluation report determined that California had successfully tested a tactic designed to improve consistency of contraceptive use: dispensing a full year’s worth of pills at one time. Eleven percent of clients in the California expansion (including 34% of clinic clients) in January 2006 received a full year’s supply, and their odds of pregnancy decreased by 30% and odds of abortion decreased by 46%, compared with women who received either one or three packs of pills at a time.(24) Dispensing a full year’s supply also saved the program $99 per woman per year in the cost of visits, compared with costs for providing three cycles at a time; that does not account for any additional cost savings from improvements in preventing unintended pregnancy.(25)
Unintended pregnancy: California’s expansion is projected to have helped program clients in 2007 to avert 296,000 unintended pregnancies; in turn, that averted about 133,000 unplanned births, 122,000 abortions, 3,000 ectopic pregnancies and 38,000 miscarriages. These numbers include 81,000 unintended pregnancies averted among adolescent clients, which would have resulted in about 41,000 unplanned births, 28,000 abortions, 800 ectopic pregnancies and 12,000 miscarriages.(25)
Teen pregnancy: In combination with a series of other interventions to reduce teen pregnancy, including an expansion of comprehensive sex education, California’s expansion program helped the state to dramatically reduce teen pregnancy.(26) Between 1992 and 2005, the state made more headway in reducing teen pregnancy than any other state, a 52% decline that nearly closed what had been a substantial gap between the rate for California and that for the entire United States.(10) Teen births in the state dropped 47% over that time period, and teen abortions declined 66% between their 1998 peak and 2005.
Government savings: By factoring in welfare, other social services costs and the cost of children’s medical care until age five (instead of age one, as is standard), California evaluators found that pregnancies averted among female expansion clients in 2007 saved more than $4 billion, including more than $1.7 billion for adolescent clients. All told, every dollar spent on the expansion saved $9.25 in government costs from conception to age five.(25)
Preventive care: According to a state-commissioned evaluation report, 67% of clients in California’s expansion (including 80% of male clients) received an STI test, for a total of 3.6 million tests during 2009–2010. Evaluators did not have access to diagnosis results for all of these tests, but data from one major laboratory provider found that 4.5% of chlamydia tests among women aged 25 or younger were positive, as were 1.8% among women aged 26–30; of those diagnosed with chlamydia, 32% were retested within 1–6 months, a practice consistent with national standards to identify repeat infection, which often occurs via untreated partners.(22)
Preventive care: Evaluation reports also found that 43% of female expansion clients in California received at least one cervical cytology test in 2009–2010; those aged 35–55 were screened at a higher rate (61%).(22) Nine percent of Pap tests came back with abnormal results.(23)


