TABLES: Promoting dual Protection in Family Planning Clinics in Ibadan Nigeria

	International Family Planning Perspectives Volume 28, Number 2, June 2002
	Promoting dual Protection in Family Planning Clinics in Ibadan Nigeria TABLES

TABLE 1. Percentage distribution of new and continuing family planning clients interviewed at baseline or at Time 2, by selected characteristics
Characteristic	Baseline	Time 2
Characteristic	(N=175)	(N=289)
Marital status
Monogamous	70.9	76.8
Polygamous	24.0	19.7
Unmarried	5.1	3.5
Age
15-24	5.7	7.6
25-34	50.3	52.9
35-44	33.7	32.6
>=45	10.3	6.9
Education*
None	11.4	10.4
Primary only	37.2	28.7
Secondary	30.8	38.4
Postsecondary	20.6	22.5
Heard about AIDS
Yes	93.7	88.6
No	6.3	11.4
Had multiple sexual partners in past year*
Yes	7.4	4.8
No	92.6	95.2
Suspected partner had other partners in past year
Yes	41.1	32.2
No	58.9	67.8
Was ever told she had an STI*
Yes	17.3	4.5
No	82.7	95.5
Total	100.0	100.0
*Difference between samples is statistically significant at p<.05 by chi-square test.

TABLE 2. Number and percentage distribution of family planning visits, by client type and method, 1999-2001
Client and method	1999		2000		2001*
Client and method	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%
Client type
New	2,655	17.7	3,792	25.2	1,906	26.4
Continuing	12,347	82.3	11,231	74.8	5,304	73.6
Method
IUD	9,490	63.3	8,134	54.2	3,949	54.8
Injectables	4,211	28.1	5,199	34.6	2,597	36.0
Pill	966	6.4	726	4.8	310	4.3
Condoms†	335	2.2	964	6.4	354	4.9
Total	15,002	100.0	15,023	100.0	7,210	100.0
*January-June. †Includes male and female condoms (single method only); female condoms were available in the clinics as of mid-December 1999.

TABLE 3. Number and percentage of visits in which male and female condoms were provided, by selected measures
Measure	2000		2001*
Measure	N	% of visits	N	% of visits
Type of condom
All	2,116	14.1†	651	9.0†
Female	1,672	11.1†	576	8.0†
Male	444	3.0†	75	1.0†
Type of use
Single method	964	45.6‡	354	54.4‡
Double method	1,152	54.4‡	297	45.6‡
Type of client
New	948	25.0§	453	23.8§
Continuing	1,168	10.4**	198	3.7**
January-June. †Of all family planning visits. ‡Of all condom visits. §Of all new-client visits. Of all continuing-client visits. Note:* From January through October 12, 2000, up to three female condoms were given free to any client who requested them. Beginning October 13, 2001, every client paid 10 naira (US $0.10) per condom.

TABLE 4. Percentage of new client visits in which providers addressed specific components of dual-protection counseling
Indicator	Baseline	Time 2
Indicator	(N=88)	(N=76)
HIV/STI risk assessment and risk reduction
Discussed client's sexual behavior	19.4	34.2*
Discussed partner's sexual behavior	16.4	35.5*
Discussed HIV/AIDS	12.1	42.1*
Discussed client's STI concerns	9.1	21.1*
Indicated to client that she might have an STI	3.6	22.4*
Discussed how to bring up HIV/STI prevention with partner	3.0	23.7*
Dual protection family planning counseling Tailored counseling and education to client's personal situation	28.0	67.1*
Compared HIV/STI protective effects of different family planning methods	7.0	42.1*
Showed client how to use the male condom	10.5	34.2*
Showed client how to use the female condom	†	80.3

Discussed how dual protection could be achieved by either one or two family planning methods	4.7	75.0*
Discussed if client's initially preferred method provided protection against HIV/STIs	2.3	49.2*
Discussed with client how she might convince her partner to use a condom	0.0	18.4*
Used dual-protection flip chart	†	47.4
Distributed brochures	3.8	27.6*
*Difference is statistically significant at p<.05 by chi-square test. †Female condom and dual-protection flip chart were unavailable at baseline.