Family Planning Perspectives |
States' Implementation of the Section 510 Abstinence Education Program, FY 1999 |
| Table 1. Percentage distribution of reported expenditures through the Section 510 abstinence program, by type of grantee, according to state, FY 1999 | |||
| State | Public | Private | Faith-based |
| Total | 48 | 40 | 11 |
| Alabama | 98 | 0 | 2 |
| Alaska | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| Arizona | 17 | 83 | 0 |
| Arkansas | 49 | 24 | 26 |
| California | na | na | na |
| Colorado | nr | nr | nr |
| Connecticut | 30 | 70 | 0 |
| Delaware | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| District of Columbia | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Florida | 24 | 66 | 10 |
| Georgia | u | u | 0 |
| Hawaii | 9 | 91 | 0 |
| Idaho | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Illinois | 24 | 50 | 27 |
| Indiana | 36 | 57 | 7 |
| Iowa | 41 | 55 | 5 |
| Kansas | 40 | 23 | 37 |
| Kentucky | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Louisiana | nr | nr | nr |
| Maine | 9 | 91 | 0 |
| Maryland | 74 | 14 | 12 |
| Massachusetts | 10 | 46 | 0 |
| Michigan | 31 | 66 | 3 |
| Minnesota | 41 | 58 | 1 |
| Mississippi | nr | nr | nr |
| Missouri | 53 | 47 | 0 |
| Montana | 18 | 49 | 33 |
| Nebraska | 33 | 9 | 0 |
| Nevada | 37 | 63 | 0 |
| New Hampshire | na | na | na |
| New Jersey | 0 | 77 | 15 |
| New Mexico | 49 | 44 | 7 |
| New York | 26 | 28 | 47 |
| North Carolina | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| North Dakota | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Ohio | 36 | 54 | 10 |
| Oklahoma | 27 | 73 | 0 |
| Oregon | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Pennsylvania | 54 | 31 | 16 |
| Puerto Rico | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Rhode Island | 0 | 100 | 0 |
| South Carolina | 0 | 100 | 0 |
| South Dakota | nr | nr | nr |
| Tennessee | 46 | 44 | 10 |
| Texas | 79 | 21 | 0 |
| Utah | 45 | 43 | 12 |
| Vermont | 0 | 100 | 0 |
| Virginia | 41 | 50 | 9 |
| Washington | 67 | 22 | 11 |
| West Virginia | 58 | 23 | 2 |
| Wisconsin | 40 | 44 | 16 |
| Wyoming | 36 | 64 | 0 |
| Notes: na=not applicable (no expenditures made). nr=no response was made to the survey. u=expenditures were made, but amount is unknown. Data may not add to 100% because of rounding and because a few states were unable to break down all of their funding in these categories. | |||
| Table 2. Number of programs in which an activity was performed through the Section 510 abstinence program, by type of activity, according to type of grantee | ||||
| Activity | Total | Public | Private | Faith-based |
| (N=45) | (N=41) | (N=36) | (N=22) | |
| In-school instruction/presentations | 38 | 34 | 25 | 18 |
| Before-/after-school programs | 34 | 24 | 24 | 16 |
| Training for teachers/school officials | 29 | 26 | 18 | 10 |
| Curriculum development/implementation | 28 | 23 | 17 | 11 |
| Education programs outside of schools | 33 | 28 | 24 | 17 |
| Parent/family education | 38 | 32 | 26 | 20 |
| Counseling/mentoring | 33 | 26 | 23 | 17 |
| Sports/recreation/community service | 23 | 17 | 14 | 12 |
| Media campaigns/public awareness | 36 | 24 | 27 | 13 |
| Local partnerships/coalition-building | 30 | 24 | 21 | 14 |
| Program planning/evaluation | 41 | 36 | 24 | 15 |
| Other | 19 | 16 | 3 | 2 |
| Table 4. Number of programs choosing to emphasize specific components of the definition of abstinence education in their Section 510 programs | ||
| Component | No. | Specific programs emphasizing |
| No component | 30 | |
| Any component | 16 | |
| Specific components | ||
| An educational or motivational program which | ||
| (A) has as its exclusive purpose, teaching the social, psychological, and health gains to be realized by abstaining from sexual activity; | 10 | Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Puerto Rico, Wyoming |
| (B) teaches abstinence from sexual activity outside marriage as the expected standard for all school age children; | 4 | Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan |
| (C) teaches that abstinence from sexual activity is the only certain way to avoid out-of-wedlock pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and other associated health problems; | 10 | Connecticut, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Washington |
| (D) teaches that a mutually faithful monogamous relationship in context of marriage is the expected standard of human sexual activity; | 1 | Hawaii |
| (E) teaches that sexual activity outside of the context of marriage is likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects; | 0 | |
| (F) teaches that bearing children out-of-wedlock is likely to have harmful consequences for the child, the child's parents, and society; | 3 | Georgia, Nevada, Rhode Island |
| (G) teaches young people how to reject sexual advances and how alcohol and drug use increases vulnerability to sexual advances; and | 16 | Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Wyoming, |
| (H) teachest the importance of attaining self-sufficiency before engaging in sexual activity | 15 | Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Washington, Wyoming, |
| |||||||||||||
| © copyright 2001, The Alan Guttmacher Institute. |