Family Planning Perspectives |
States' Implementation of the Section 510 Abstinence Education Program, FY 1999 |
Table 1. Percentage distribution of reported expenditures through the Section 510 abstinence program, by type of grantee, according to state, FY 1999 | |||
State | Public | Private | Faith-based |
Total | 48 | 40 | 11 |
Alabama | 98 | 0 | 2 |
Alaska | 50 | 50 | 0 |
Arizona | 17 | 83 | 0 |
Arkansas | 49 | 24 | 26 |
California | na | na | na |
Colorado | nr | nr | nr |
Connecticut | 30 | 70 | 0 |
Delaware | 100 | 0 | 0 |
District of Columbia | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Florida | 24 | 66 | 10 |
Georgia | u | u | 0 |
Hawaii | 9 | 91 | 0 |
Idaho | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Illinois | 24 | 50 | 27 |
Indiana | 36 | 57 | 7 |
Iowa | 41 | 55 | 5 |
Kansas | 40 | 23 | 37 |
Kentucky | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Louisiana | nr | nr | nr |
Maine | 9 | 91 | 0 |
Maryland | 74 | 14 | 12 |
Massachusetts | 10 | 46 | 0 |
Michigan | 31 | 66 | 3 |
Minnesota | 41 | 58 | 1 |
Mississippi | nr | nr | nr |
Missouri | 53 | 47 | 0 |
Montana | 18 | 49 | 33 |
Nebraska | 33 | 9 | 0 |
Nevada | 37 | 63 | 0 |
New Hampshire | na | na | na |
New Jersey | 0 | 77 | 15 |
New Mexico | 49 | 44 | 7 |
New York | 26 | 28 | 47 |
North Carolina | 100 | 0 | 0 |
North Dakota | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Ohio | 36 | 54 | 10 |
Oklahoma | 27 | 73 | 0 |
Oregon | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Pennsylvania | 54 | 31 | 16 |
Puerto Rico | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Rhode Island | 0 | 100 | 0 |
South Carolina | 0 | 100 | 0 |
South Dakota | nr | nr | nr |
Tennessee | 46 | 44 | 10 |
Texas | 79 | 21 | 0 |
Utah | 45 | 43 | 12 |
Vermont | 0 | 100 | 0 |
Virginia | 41 | 50 | 9 |
Washington | 67 | 22 | 11 |
West Virginia | 58 | 23 | 2 |
Wisconsin | 40 | 44 | 16 |
Wyoming | 36 | 64 | 0 |
Notes: na=not applicable (no expenditures made). nr=no response was made to the survey. u=expenditures were made, but amount is unknown. Data may not add to 100% because of rounding and because a few states were unable to break down all of their funding in these categories. |
Table 2. Number of programs in which an activity was performed through the Section 510 abstinence program, by type of activity, according to type of grantee | ||||
Activity | Total | Public | Private | Faith-based |
(N=45) | (N=41) | (N=36) | (N=22) | |
In-school instruction/presentations | 38 | 34 | 25 | 18 |
Before-/after-school programs | 34 | 24 | 24 | 16 |
Training for teachers/school officials | 29 | 26 | 18 | 10 |
Curriculum development/implementation | 28 | 23 | 17 | 11 |
Education programs outside of schools | 33 | 28 | 24 | 17 |
Parent/family education | 38 | 32 | 26 | 20 |
Counseling/mentoring | 33 | 26 | 23 | 17 |
Sports/recreation/community service | 23 | 17 | 14 | 12 |
Media campaigns/public awareness | 36 | 24 | 27 | 13 |
Local partnerships/coalition-building | 30 | 24 | 21 | 14 |
Program planning/evaluation | 41 | 36 | 24 | 15 |
Other | 19 | 16 | 3 | 2 |
Table 4. Number of programs choosing to emphasize specific components of the definition of abstinence education in their Section 510 programs | ||
Component | No. | Specific programs emphasizing |
No component | 30 | |
Any component | 16 | |
Specific components | ||
An educational or motivational program which | ||
(A) has as its exclusive purpose, teaching the social, psychological, and health gains to be realized by abstaining from sexual activity; | 10 | Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Puerto Rico, Wyoming |
(B) teaches abstinence from sexual activity outside marriage as the expected standard for all school age children; | 4 | Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan |
(C) teaches that abstinence from sexual activity is the only certain way to avoid out-of-wedlock pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and other associated health problems; | 10 | Connecticut, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Washington |
(D) teaches that a mutually faithful monogamous relationship in context of marriage is the expected standard of human sexual activity; | 1 | Hawaii |
(E) teaches that sexual activity outside of the context of marriage is likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects; | 0 | |
(F) teaches that bearing children out-of-wedlock is likely to have harmful consequences for the child, the child's parents, and society; | 3 | Georgia, Nevada, Rhode Island |
(G) teaches young people how to reject sexual advances and how alcohol and drug use increases vulnerability to sexual advances; and | 16 | Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Wyoming, |
(H) teachest the importance of attaining self-sufficiency before engaging in sexual activity | 15 | Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Washington, Wyoming, |
| |||||||||||||
© copyright 2001, The Alan Guttmacher Institute. |