Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Volume 34, Number 6, November/December 2002

 

Chronically Homeless Women's
Perceived Deterrents to Contraception
TABLES

TABLE 1. Percentage distribution of chronically homeless women, by selected characteristics, Los Angeles, 1997
Characteristic %
(N=229)
Age
15-24 17
25-34 44
>=35 39
Race/ethnicity
Black 58
White 15
Hispanic 17
Other 11
Education
<high school graduate 41
>=high school graduate 59
Marital status
Married 9
Widowed/separated/divorced 25
Never-married 66
Pregnant in past year
Yes 23
No 77
Frequency of vaginal sex in past year
<once per month 29
2-3 times per month 21
Once per week 9
2-6 times per week 33
Every day 8
Frequency of birth control use in past year
Rarely/never 34
Sometimes 31
Always 35
Modal living place in past 60 days
Sheltered housing 84
Outdoors 16
Depressed in past year
Yes 49
No 51
Lifetime history of alcohol abuse
Yes 46
No 54
Lifetime history of drug abuse
Yes 61
No 39
Total 100
Note: Percentages are weighted.

back to text


TABLE 2. Percentage distribution of all chronically homeless women, by perception of potential deterrents to contraceptive use; and percentage distribution of chronically homeless women, by frequency of contraceptive use, according to perception of potential deterrents to use
Perceived deterrent % of all women % by frequency of use
Rarely/never Sometimes Always Total
No place to store
No problem 78 34 31 36 100
Small problem 7 14 56 29 100
Big problem 16 45 24 32 100
Do not know where to get*
No problem 80 34 31 35 100
Small problem 7 13 29 58 100
Big problem 13 49 34 17 100
Do not know how to use***
No problem 77 27 32 41 100
Small problem 7 27 60 13 100
Big problem 17 69 19 12 100
Do not know which method to use***
No problem 60 25 33 42 100
Small problem 22 33 34 33 100
Big problem 18 66 24 11 100
Cost**
No problem 67 24 33 38 100
Small problem 12 33 23 45 100
Big problem 20 53 31 16 100
Partner dislikes using***
No problem 58 22 34 44 100
Small problem 18 38 48 14 100
Big problem 23 62 12 26 100
Side effects
No problem 60 29 34 36 100
Small problem 13 35 27 37 100
Big problem 27 44 27 29 100
Uncomfortable/unnatural*
No problem 67 29 31 40 100
Small problem 17 54 29 17 100
Big problem 16 36 35 29 100
Health risk
No problem 54 29 33 38 100
Small problem 20 43 34 24 100
Big problem 26 39 26 34 100
Total 100 na na na na
*p<.05. **p<.01. ***p<.001. Notes: Significance levels apply to overall comparisons. Percentages are weighted. na=not applicable.

back to text


TABLE 3. Percentage of homeless women who reported having big problems with each potential deterrent to contraceptive use, by selected characteristics
Characteristic No place to store Do not know where to get Do not know how to use Do not know which method to use Cost Partner dislikes using Side effects Uncomfortable/
unnatural
Health risk
Age
15-24 6* 9 29** 34* 14 29 26 9* 30
25-34 23 18 21 18 26 24 24 12 24
35-44 12 10 7 12 17 21 31 24 27
Race/ethnicity
White 2*** 2 8*** 10*** 25 21** 23 17* 15**
Black 24 17 16 16 19 18 28 22 34
Hispanic 4 6 40 46 33 45 33 6 23
Other 10 5 0 0 5 19 19 0 5
Education
<high school graduate 23 17 25 23 23 35 27 15 26
>=high school graduate 11* 11 12** 15 19 15*** 27 17 7
Modal living place in past 60 days
Sheltered housing 14* 11* 15 21** 20 25 31** 19* 30*
Outdoors 28 24 27 3 22 13 8 5 10
Lifetime history of drug abuse
No 6 6 8 8 10 13 22 14 18
Yes 22*** 18* 23** 25*** 27** 30** 29 18 32*
Lifetime history of alcohol abuse
No 9 11 22 22 21 26 27 13 21
Yes 23** 16 12* 14 20 21 27 20 33*
Depressed in past year
No 12 10 19 16 21 17 31 14 20
Yes 20 17 15 20 20 30* 23 18 33*
*p<.05. **p<.01. ***p<.001. Note: For age and race, significance levels apply to overall comparisons.

back to text


TABLE 4. Odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) from logistic regression analyses assessing the risk that a homeless woman would perceive each potential deterrent to contraceptive use to be a big problem, by selected characteristics
Characteristic No place to store Do not where to get Do not know
how to use
Do not know
which method to use
Cost Partner dislikes using Side effects Uncomfortable/
unnatural
Health risk
Age
15-24 1.00 1.37 5.68 2.93 0.64 0.68 0.64 0.36 1.38
(0.12-8.61) (0.23-8.18) (0.95-33.86) (0.78-10.99) (0.10-3.99) (0.24-1.94) (0.17-2.37) (0.09-1.44) (0.49-3.91)
25-34 2.08 1.84 2.50 1.41 1.48 0.68 0.64 0.47 0.91
(0.64-6.73) (0.48-7.12) (0.59-10.54) (0.41-4.83) (0.56-3.91) (0.24-1.92) (0.27-1.51) (0.17-1.30) (0.42-1.96)
35-44 (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Race/ethnicity
White/other (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Black 5.48* 1.93 3.75 4.03* 0.93 1.00 1.56 3.31* 5.98***
(1.34-22.5) (0.47-7.92) (0.48-29.49) (1.01-16.05) (0.24-3.54) (0.31-3.21) (0.49-4.93) (1.18-9.31) (2.59-13.85)
Hispanic 0.74 0.63 9.83* 9.64** 2.27 3.08 1.84 0.91 2.65
(0.08-7.05) (0.06-6.17) (1.11-87.38) (1.80-51.67) (0.54-9.58) (0.64-14.74) (0.29-11.90) (0.15-5.44) (0.64-10.96)
<high school graduate (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
>=high school graduate 0.58 0.80 0.49 0.77 1.13 0.27** 0.95 0.98 1.17
(0.20-1.68) (0.23-2.72) (0.16-1.54) (0.22-2.71) (0.34-3.71) (0.10-0.72) (0.41-2.34) (0.41-2.34) (0.45-3.07)
Modal living place
Sheltered housing (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Outdoors 3.07 4.04 5.64 0.14 1.56 0.89 0.09** 0.15* 0.25*
(0.79-11.90) (0.72-22.50) (0.83-38.22) (0.02-1.10) (0.34-7.18) (0.98-8.08) (0.02-0.45) (0.03-0.65) (0.07-0.93)
Lifetime history of drug abuse
No (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 2.92 3.17 7.74* 7.25** 5.21* 2.81 1.55 0.90 1.42
(0.82-10.46) (0.86-11.73) (1.55-38.48) (1.72-30.52) (1.25-21.63) (0.98-8.08) (0.55-4.35) (0.33-2.48) (0.49-4.12)
Lifetime history of alcohol abuse
No (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.29 0.68 0.19** 0.37 0.61 0.37 1.13 1.52 1.62
(0.39-4.23) (0.18-2.55) (0.05-0.66) (0.10-1.40) (0.26-1.42) (0.12-1.14) (0.45-2.84) (0.54-4.28) (0.59-4.44)
History of depression in past year
No (ref) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 2.33 2.44* 0.80 0.77 0.75 2.18 0.43 1.05 1.45
(0.69-7.81) (1.06-5.63) (0.26-2.43) (0.30-2.01) (0.28-1.98) (0.97-4.92) (0.16-1.17) (0.45-2.44) (0.59-4.44)
*p<.05. **p<.01. ***p<.001. Note: ref=reference group.


back to text


home  |   about  |   contact  |   support AGI   |   help
publications  |   article archive  |   e-lists  |   search
statement of accuracy © copyright 2002, The Alan Guttmacher Institute.