1. Ehrhardt AA and Exner TM, Prevention of sexual risk behavior for HIV infection with women, AIDS, 2000, 14(Suppl. 2):S53–S58; El-Bassel N et al., HIV prevention for intimate couples: a relationship-based model, Families, Systems and Health, 2001, 19(4):379–395; and Musaba E et al., Long-term use of the female condom among couples at high risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection in Zambia, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 1998, 25(5):260–264.
2. World Health Organization, The Female Condom: A Review, Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997; Cecil H et al., The female condom: what we have learned thus far, AIDS and Behavior, 1998, 2(3):241–256; and Hoffman S et al., The future of the female condom, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2004, 36(3):120–126.
3. Feldblum PJ et al., Female condom introduction and sexually transmitted infection prevalence: results of a community intervention trial in Kenya, AIDS, 2001, 15(8):1037–1044; French PP et al., Use-effectiveness of the female versus male condom in preventing sexually transmitted disease in women, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2003, 30(5):433–439; and Fontanet AL et al., Protection against sexually transmitted diseases by granting sex workers in Thailand the choice of using the male or female condom: results from a randomized controlled trial, AIDS, 1998, 12(14):1851–1859.
4. Cecil H et al., 1998, op. cit. (see reference 2); Hoffman S et al., 2004, op. cit. (see reference 2); and Fontanet AL et al., 1998, op. cit. (see reference 3).
5. Hoffman S et al., Female-condom use in a gender-specific family planning clinic trial, American Journal of Public Health, 2003, 93(11):1897– 1903; Artz L et al., Effectiveness of an intervention promoting the female condom to patients at sexually transmitted disease clinics, American Journal of Public Health, 2000, 90(2):237–244; Stein Z et al., Safer sex strategies for women: the hierarchical model in methadone treatment clinics, Journal of Urban Health, 1999, 76(1):62–72; and Witte SS et al., Predictors of female condom use among women exchanging street sex in New York City, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2000, 27(2):93–100.
6. Musaba E et al., 1998, op. cit., (see reference 1); and Macaluso M et al., Female condom use among women at high risk of sexually transmitted disease, Family Planning Perspectives, 2000, 32(3):138–144.
7. Hoffman S et al., 2004, op. cit. (see reference 2).
8. World Health Organization, 1997, op. cit. (see reference 2); and Hoffman S et al., 2004, op. cit. (see reference 2).
9. El-Bassel N et al., Long-term effects of an HIV/STI sexual risk reduction intervention for heterosexual couples, AIDS and Behavior, 2005, 9(1):1–13; and El-Bassel N et al., The efficacy of a relationship-based HIV/STD prevention program for heterosexual couples, American Journal of Public Health, 2003, 93(6):963–969.
10. El-Bassel N et al., 2001, op. cit. (see reference 1); El-Bassel N et al., 2005, op. cit. (see reference 9); El-Bassel N et al., 2003, op. cit. (see reference 9); and Witte SS et al., Recruitment of minority women and their main sexual partners in an HIV/STI prevention trial, Journal of Women's Health, 2004, 13(10):1137–1147.
11. Straus MA et al., The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data, Journal of Family Issues, 1996, 17(3):283–316.
12. Witte SS et al., 2004, op. cit. (see reference 10).
13. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, For Women Only: What Women Can Do to Protect Themselves from AIDS, Albany, NY: New York State Department of Health, 1997.
14. Witte SS et al., 2000, op. cit. (see reference 5).
15. Schafer JL, Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data, London: Chapman & Hall, 1997; and Rubin DB, Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
16. Royston P, Multiple imputation of missing values: update, Stata Journal, 2005, 5(2):118–201.
17. Gardner W, Mulvey EP and Shaw EC, Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models, Psychological Bulletin, 1995, 118(3):392–404.
18. Koepsell TD et al., Data analysis and sample size issues in evaluations of community-based health promotion and disease prevention programs: a mixed-model analysis of variance approach, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991, 44(7):701–713; and Zhou H and Weinberg CR, Potential for bias in estimating human fecundability parameters: a comparison of statistical models, Statistics in Medicine, 1999, 18(4):411–422.
19. Cochran WG and Cox GM, Experimental Designs, second ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
20. Voluntary HIV-1 Counseling and Testing Efficacy Study Group, Efficacy of voluntary HIV-1 counselling and testing in individuals and couples in Kenya, Tanzania, and Trinidad: a randomised trial, Lancet, 2000, 356(9224):103–112; Dolezal C et al., Sexual risk behavior changes among HIV+ and HIV- female injecting drug users over 4 years, Women & Health, 1998, 27(4):1–17; and Dolezal C et al., Longitudinal changes in sexual risk behavior among HIV+ and HIV- male injecting drug users, American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 1999, 25(2):281–303.
21. Hoffman S et al., 2003, op. cit. (see reference 5); Kalichman SC, Williams E and Nachimson D, Brief behavioral skills building intervention for female controlled methods of STD-HIV prevention: outcomes of a randomized clinical field trial, International Journal of STD & AIDS, 1999, 10(3):174–181; and Van Devanter N et al., Effect of an STD/HIV behavioral intervention on women's use of the female condom, American Journal of Public Health, 2002, 92(1):109–115.
22. El-Bassel N et al., 2005, op. cit. (see reference 9); and El-Bassel N et al., 2003, op. cit. (see reference 9).
23. Gollub EL et al., A randomized trial of hierarchical counseling in a short, clinic-based intervention to reduce the risk of sexually transmitted diseases in women, AIDS and Behavior, 2000, 14(9):1249–1255; Latka M et al., Male-condom and female-condom use among women after counseling in a risk-reduction hierarchy for STD prevention, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2000, 27(8):431–437; and Stein Z et al., 1999, op. cit. (see reference 5).
24. O'Leary A, Preventing HIV infection in heterosexual women: what do we know? what must we learn? Applied and Preventive Psychology, 1999, 8(4):257–263.
25. Musaba E et al., 1998, op. cit. (see reference 1); Artz L et al., 2000, op. cit. (see reference 5); Gollub EL et al., 2000, op. cit. (see reference 23); Kalichman SC, Williams E and Nachimson D, 1999, op. cit. (see reference 21); Stein Z et al., 1999, op. cit. (see reference 5); and Sly DF et al., Factors associated with the use of the female condom, Family Planning Perspectives, 1997, 29(4):181–184.
26. Musaba E et al., 1998, op. cit. (see reference 1).
27. Ibid.; Hoffman S et al., 2003, op. cit. (see reference 5); and Padian N et al., Choice of female-controlled methods in Northern California, paper presented at the 127th meeting of the American Public Health Association, Chicago, Nov. 7–11, 1999.
28. Cecil H et al., 1998, op. cit. (see reference 2); Artz L et al., 2000, op. cit. (see reference 5); Kalichman SC, Williams E and Nachimson D, 1999, op. cit. (see reference 21); Witte SS et al., Acceptability of the female condom among women exchanging street sex in New York City, International Journal of STD & AIDS, 1999, 10(3):162–168; El-Bassel N et al., Correlates of intention to use the female condom among women on methadone, Women's Health Issues, 1998, 8(2):112–122; and Gollub EL, Stein Z and El-Sadr W, Short-term acceptability of the female condom among staff and patients at a New York City hospital, Family Planning Perspectives, 1995, 27(4):155–158.
29. Kaler A, The female condom in North America: selling the technology of empowerment, Journal of Gender Studies, 2004, 13(2):139–152.
30. Artz L et al., 2000, op. cit. (see reference 5).
31. Hoffman S et al., 2004, op. cit. (see reference 2); and French PP et al., 2003 op. cit. (see reference 3).