1. Westoff CF, The potential demand for family planning: a new measure of unmet need and estimates for five Latin American countries, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1988, 14(2): 45–53.
2. Bradley SEK et al., Revising unmet need for family planning, DHS Analytical Studies, Calverton, MD, USA: ICF International, 2012, No. 25.
3. Sedgh G and Hussain R, Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries, Studies in Family Planning, 2014, 45(2):151–169.
4. Singh S, Darroch J and Ashford L, Adding It Up: The Costs and Benefits of Investing in Sexual and Reproductive Health 2014, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2014.
5. Creel LC, Sass JV and Yinger NV, Client-centered quality: clients’ perspectives and barriers to receiving care, New Perspectives on Quality of Care, Washington, DC: Population Council and Population Reference Bureau, 2002, No. 2.
6. Ali MM, Cleland JG and Shah IH, Causes and Consequences of Contraceptive Discontinuation: Evidence from 60 Demographic and Health Surveys, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2012.
7. Lee J and Jezewski MA, Attitudes toward oral contraceptive use among women of reproductive age: a systematic review, Advances in Nursing Science, 2007, 30(1):E85–E103.
8. Grubb GS, Women’s perceptions of the safety of the pill: a survey in eight developing countries. Report of the perceptions of the pill survey group, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1987, 19(3):313–321.
9. Castle S, Factors influencing young Malians’ reluctance to use hormonal contraceptives, Studies in Family Planning, 2003, 34(3):186–199.
10. Ochako R et al., Barriers to modern contraceptive methods uptake among young women in Kenya: a qualitative study, BMC Public Health, 2015, 15(1):118.
11. Rutenberg N and Watkins SC, The buzz outside the clinics: conversations and contraception in Nyanza Province, Kenya, Studies in Family Planning, 1997, 28(4):290–307.
12. Paz Soldan VA, How family planning ideas are spread within social groups in rural Malawi, Studies in Family Planning, 2004, 35(4):275–290.
13. Yee L and Simon M, The role of the social network in contraceptive decision-making among young, African American and Latina women, Journal of Adolescent Health, 2010, 47(4):374–380.
14. Ankomah A, Anyanti J and Oladosu M, Myths, misinformation, and communication about family planning and contraceptive use in Nigeria, Open Access Journal of Contraception, 2011, 2(1):95–105.
15. DeClerque J et al., Rumor, misinformation and oral contraceptive use in Egypt, Social Science & Medicine, 1986, 23(1):83–92.
16. Hall MAK, Stephenson RB and Juvekar S, Social and logistical barriers to the use of reversible contraception among women in a rural Indian village, Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 2008, 26(2):241–250.
17. Measurement, Learning & Evaluation of the Urban Reproductive Health Initiative (MLE), Tupange, and Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Report of the Baseline Household Survey for the Kenya Urban Reproductive Health Initiative (Tupange), Chapel Hill, NC, USA: MLE; and Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya Urban Reproductive Health Initiative (Tupange), and Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), 2011.
18. MLE, Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative (NURHI) and National Population Commission (NPC), 2010–2011 Nigeria Baseline Survey for the Urban Reproductive Health Initiative, Chapel Hill, NC, USA: MLE, 2011.
19. MLE and Initiative Sénégalaise de Santé Urbaine (ISSU), 2011 Baseline Survey for the Senegal Urban Health Initiative (ISSU) Household Survey: Final Report, Chapel Hill, NC, USA: MLE and ISSU, 2012.
20. MLE, Measurement, Learning & Evaluation of the Urban Reproductive Health Initiative: Kenya, 2013 Mid-term Survey, TWP 3–2013, Chapel Hill, NC, USA: MLE, 2013.
21. MLE, NURHI and NPC, Measurement, Learning & Evaluation of the Urban Reproductive Health Initiative: Nigeria, 2012 Midterm Survey, Chapel Hill, NC, USA: MLE, 2013.
22. MLE et al, Les résultats de l’évaluation à mi-parcours du projet ISSU/MLE. L’enquête auprès des ménages et l’enquête au niveau des points de prestations de services (PPS), Chapel Hill, NC, USA: MLE, ISSU, Agence pour la Promotion des Activités de Population—Sénégal and Global Research and Advocacy Group, 2014.
23. Campbell M, Sahin-Hodoglugil NN and Potts M, Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature, Studies in Family Planning, 2006, 37(2):87–98.
24. Orji EO and Onwudiegwu U, Prevalence and determinants of contraceptive practice in a defined Nigerian population, Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2002, 22(5):540–543.
25. Otoide VO, Oronsaye F and Okonofua FE, Why Nigerian adolescents seek abortion rather than contraception: evidence from focus-group discussions, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2001, 27(2):77–81.
26. Bailey CE, Three Papers on Side Effects and Modern Contraceptive Use Among Women in Ghana, Southampton, UK: School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, 2009.
27. Stephenson R et al., Contextual influences on modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa, American Journal of Public Health, 2007, 97(7):1233–1240.
28. Stephenson R and Tsui AO, Contextual influences on reproductive health service use in Uttar Pradesh, India, Studies in Family Planning, 2002, 33(4):309–320.
29. Stephenson R, Community influences on young people’s sexual behavior in 3 African countries, American Journal of Public Health, 2009, 99(1):102–109.
30. Tuoane M, Diamond I and Madise N, Use of family planning in Lesotho: the importance of quality of care and access, African Population Studies, 2003, 18(2):105–132.
31. Oliver R, Contraceptive use in Ghana: the role of service availability, quality, and price, Living Standards Measurement Study Working Papers, Washington, DC: World Bank, 1995, No. 111.
32. Magnani RJ et al., The impact of the family planning supply environment on contraceptive intentions and use in Morocco, Studies in Family Planning, 1999, 30(2):120–132.
33. Dinkelman T, Lam D and Leibbrandt M, Household and community income, economic shocks and risky sexual behavior of young adults: evidence from the Cape Area Panel Study 2002 and 2005, AIDS, 2007, 21(Suppl. 7):S49–S56.
34. Speizer IS et al., Sexual violence and reproductive health outcomes among South African female youths: a contextual analysis, American Journal of Public Health, 2009, 99(Suppl. 2):S425–S431.
35. Pallitto CC and O’Campo P, Community level effects of gender inequality on intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy in Colombia: testing the feminist perspective, Social Science & Medicine, 2005, 60(10):2205–2216.
36. McQuestion MJ, Endogenous social effects on intimate partner violence in Colombia, Social Science Research, 2003, 32(2):335–345.
37. Elfstrom KM and Stephenson R, The role of place in shaping contraceptive use among women in Africa, PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(7):e40670.
38. Otoide VO, Oronsaye F and Okonofua FE, Why Nigerian adolescents seek abortion rather than contraception: evidence from focus-group discussions, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2001, 27(2):77–81.
39. Rutstein SO and Johnson K, The DHS Wealth Index, DHS Comparative Reports, Calverton, MD, USA: ORC Macro, 2004, No. 6.
40. Bankole A, Rodriguez G and Westoff CF, Mass media messages and reproductive behaviour in Nigeria, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1996, 28(2):227–239.
41. Gupta N, Katende C and Bessinger R, Associations of mass media exposure with family planning attitudes and practices in Uganda, Studies in Family Planning, 2003, 34(1):19–31.