Malawi’s abortion law (based on the 1930 Penal Code) has been highly restrictive, allowing termination of pregnancy only where it is necessary to save the life of the woman.1 The adoption of a democratic constitution in 1995 introduced a comprehensive Bill of Rights, including specific rights accorded to women and children.
This framework was strengthened with passage of the Gender Equality Act in 2013 (implemented in 2014), which recognizes sexual and reproductive health and rights. However, lack of guidance on how protections should be operationalized has resulted in health providers relying almost exclusively on the Penal Code. This has led to widespread uncertainty and restrictive interpretations of abortion provision within the health system. As a result, even women and girls whose pregnancies posed serious risks to their life were often denied services.
In October 2025, the High Court of Malawi delivered a pivotal judgment in AC (a Minor) v. Solomon and Others, a case about a 14-year-old survivor of sexual violence who was denied access to safe abortion.2 The Court held that denying her abortion services violated her sexual and reproductive health and rights under the Gender Equality Act.
- The Court clarified that a risk to life includes both physical and mental health risks, particularly in the context of pregnancy resulting from sexual violence.
- The Court affirmed that health providers have a duty to provide accurate information and respectful care, enabling informed decision-making about sexual and reproductive health services.
- The Court directed the Ministry of Health to review and amend the national postabortion care (PAC) guidelines within 180 days to explicitly recognize that child survivors of sexual violence have a right to seek an abortion if they choose to do so. It also underscored the need for provider training and institutional accountability to ensure compliance.
This judgment confirmed that legal abortion in Malawi is not limited to immediate physical harm to a pregnant woman; the circumstances extend to serious mental health risks, especially for minors whose pregnancy results from rape or incest.
Guidelines on Provision of Postabortion Care
Malawi's National Post Abortion Care Standards and Guidelines (2020–2025) continue to guide PAC provision.3 The guidelines’ goals included integrating PAC into broader sexual and reproductive health care, increasing accessibility of PAC services, and ensuring quality care through training and equipment provision.
Other aspects of the guidelines:
- Allowed mid-level providers to offer PAC services in order to expand service delivery.
- Emphasized that providers can use their clinical judgment to determine whether circumstances are life threatening for a patient before performing an abortion.
- Endorsed the use of misoprostol and manual vacuum aspiration to manage incomplete abortion, and recommended that all PAC patients receive family planning counseling and a contraceptive method of choice.
This guidance was intended to reduce unsafe abortion complications. However, challenges such as inadequate dissemination of the guidelines, insufficient provider training, limited medication availability and sociocultural stigma have undermined full implementation, and 65% of providers stated in 2025 that they declined to provide PAC for fear of breaking the law.4 The next national PAC guidelines (2026–2030) are under review.