Volume 32, Issue 2
June 2006
|
Page 62

Partnership Dynamics and Sexual Health Risks Among Male Adolescents in the Favelas of Recife, Brazil
Fatima Juárez, Guttmacher Institute Teresa Castro Martín

First published online:

CONTEXT

Adolescents' past and current partnerships influence their sexual health risks. Males' responsibilities and needs in terms of sexual health have long received less attention than females'. It is important to examine male adolescent sexual and contraceptive patterns within the broader context of partnership dynamics.

METHODS

In May 2000, 1,438 males aged 13–19 living in the urban shantytowns of Recife, Brazil, were surveyed. Adolescents gave detailed partnership, sexual and contraceptive history data in the form of month-by-month calendars for the prior two years. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations between prior and current partnership experience and contraceptive use.

RESULTS

Overall, 76% of respondents reported having had at least one partnership in the past two years; 49% of partnerships involved intercourse. On average, steady and casual partnerships lasted 4.7 months and 1.6 months, respectively. Respondents typically had spent 2.8 months of the past two years in a sexual partnership, 1.2 months of which were unprotected by contraceptive use. Of those with a recent partnership, having had a prior sexual partner was associated with elevated odds of being sexually active in the current or most recent partnership (odds ratio, 4.0). Of sexually active adolescents, having used contraceptives at first sex or in a former sexual partnership was associated with elevated odds of having used a condom in the current or most recent sexual partnership (7.9 and 6.5, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevention programs need to have an accurate portrait of adolescent partnership dynamics, an adequate understanding of adolescent sexuality and a realistic estimation of actual exposure to risk, so interventions and messages can be tailored to adolescents' realities.

International Family Planning Perspectives, 2006, 32(2):62–70.

In Brazil, as in most developed and developing countries, initiation of sexual activity typically occurs during one's teenage years.1 Data on adolescent sexual behavior have been scarce, but in the past two decades, the global threat posed by the HIV epidemic has moved the issue of adolescent sexual health to the forefront of research and policy agendas,2 and the crucial importance of addressing the special sexual and reproductive health needs of young people has been emphasized in many international forums.3 In addition, because condoms remain the only method of preventing the sexual transmission of HIV, male responsibilities in terms of sexual health and contraceptive decision making have become the focus of increasing attention.4

According to the Brazil's 2000 census, 10–19-year-olds comprise more than one-fifth of the country's population. Although total fertility declined in Brazil over the past decades, fertility rates for adolescents increased significantly, from 75 births per 1,000 women aged 15–19 in 1991 to 94 in 2000.5 Also, Brazil accounts for more than half of all AIDS cases in Latin America.6 And even though the national incidence rate of AIDS has remained stable at around 18 new cases per 100,000 persons since 1997,7 and there has been a significant reduction of AIDS-related mortality since 1996 because of universal access to retroviral therapy,8 infection rates among youth continue to rise.9

During the past decade, both governmental and nongovernmental organizations have launched ambitious campaigns to promote responsible sexual behavior, with special emphasis on condom promotion and distribution. These public health efforts have brought about a notable change in awareness and attitudes among adolescents;10 however, further efforts are needed to translate HIV awareness, which is practically universal, into behavioral change.11

Adolescence is a period of growth, experimentation and identity search during which individuals start establishing interpersonal bonds beyond the family, including romantic and sexual relationships.12 During this stage of physical, emotional and social maturation, many adolescents are ill-equipped to avoid choices that may compromise their long-term sexual and reproductive health.13 Sexual experimentation, sporadic relationships, casual encounters, simultaneous relationships and frequent partner change are commonly assumed to be natural features of adolescent partnership dynamics.14 Little research, however, has been conducted to assess how prevalent these patterns are, particularly in less developed societies. Most research efforts have focused on measuring the determinants of early sexual initiation and of condom use, particularly at first and last sexual episodes,15 but to understand the rationale behind adolescent behavior, it is important to examine adolescents' sexual experiences within the broader context of partnership dynamics.

The objective of this study is to examine whether male adolescents' engagement in protected or unprotected sexual intercourse is influenced by prior and current partnership experience. We decided to focus on males because men traditionally have been underserved by reproductive health programs.16 Our analysis expands on prior research by examining all partnerships (both sexual and nonsexual*), to assess the proportion of close relationships that involve sexual intercourse; by tracing partnership and sexual trajectories during a two-year period, to estimate actual durations of exposure to health risks; and by linking early, recent and current partnership experiences, to explore the influence of partnership biographies on risk prevention and to assess whether there is continuity of sexual and contraceptive patterns across successive partnerships.

METHODS

Data

This study is part of a larger project to promote condom use among low-income adolescent males in Recife, Brazil, and to assess the impact of an intervention designed to encourage adolescent males to adopt and maintain safe sexual behavior.† Recife is the second largest city in the Northeast, Brazil's poorest region, where 49% of the population live below the national poverty level.17 In May 2000, we conducted a baseline survey of all unmarried adolescent males aged 13–19 in four neighborhoods in the favelas (urban shantytowns) of Recife: Campina do Barreto, Cajueiro, Arruda and Bultrins. We selected these areas because they were classified by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics as being wholly composed of census tracts of the lowest socio- economic strata. The refusal rate was approximately 20%, resulting in a sample of 1,438 adolescent males.

In designing the survey, we made a considerable effort to ensure that questions were culturally sensitive and to facilitate respondents' recall of their past partnership behavior. We pretested the survey tools several times to obtain the best possible data quality. In addition, we used qualitative data from focus groups and in-depth interviews to inform the design and refinement of the survey instrument, and we employed adolescents' own terminology when inquiring about partnership and sexual issues. The interviewers were young men in their 20s with at least two years of university studies in psychology or sociology. They received one week of intensive training and were also involved in the qualitative fieldwork for the project. The interview protocol was designed to build a level of comfort for discussing sexual issues.

The survey took respondents about 45 minutes to complete, and collected information on their social and demographic background, views on sexual matters, HIV risk awareness and beliefs, and attitudes relevant to condom use. In addition, it asked about the timing and context of their first date and sexual initiation, as well as detailed partnership, sexual and contraceptive histories, in the form of month-by-month calendars for the two years prior to the interview date. Each respondent was asked to identify up to four heterosexual partners; partnerships did not necessarily involve sexual intimacy. For each reported partnership, the interviewers recorded starting and ending dates, the respondent's degree of commitment to the relationship (casual vs. steady), partner's age and whether the respondent engaged in sexual intercourse. If the partnership involved sexual intercourse, the respondent answered additional questions about the onset of the relationship and contraceptive use.

Analysis

We used descriptive analysis to portray the characteristics, duration patterns and dynamics of adolescent males' recent partnerships. By combining partnership, sexual and contraceptive calendar data for a 25-month study period (two prior years, plus interview month), we estimated male adolescents' actual exposure to unprotected sex. Given that adolescent behavior differs largely by developmental stage, we present separate indicators by age.

To measure standard of household living, we created an index based on the presence of 18 household consumer durables (for example, a radio or a refrigerator). Households were grouped into three categories, with the poorest households having eight or fewer assets, moderately poor households having 9–11 assets and better-off households having 12 or more assets.‡ Because all the respondents came from impoverished neighborhoods, this index was designed to capture relative socioeconomic differentials.

Next, we examined the influence of prior partnership experiences and current partnership context on the respondents' behavior. We proceeded in a stepwise fashion by first examining whether the timing of dating initiation was associated with the adolescents' partnership experience within the past two years. Second, among adolescents who reported at least one recent partnership, we estimated the associations of previous partnership experience and current type of relationship with sexual involvement with their current or last partner. Third, among adolescents who reported having had at least one recent sexual partnership, we examined the associations of prior sexual and contraceptive experience and current relationship status with condom use in their current or last partnership.

We used logistic regression analysis for multivariate modelling; all models controlled for respondents' social and demographic background.

RESULTS

Sample Characteristics

In the overall sample, 43% of respondents were aged 13–15, 31% were 16–17 and 26% were 18–19 (Table 1); the mean age was 15.9 years (not shown). More than half (55%) of respondents reported being of mixed race; 28% were white, and 17% were black. Catholicism was the predominant religion (54%); 15% of respondents reported another religion (mainly Evangelical) and 31% reported no religion. Half of the respondents did not live with both biological parents at the time of the survey; although this was mainly a consequence of parental separation, 14% reported that one or both of their parents were dead (not shown). Eighty-one percent of respondents resided in a household with a low or medium-low standard of living.

The vast majority of respondents (87%) were still attending school. In Brazil, the length of compulsory education is eight years—from age seven to age 14—and corresponds to the primary school cycle. Given that respondents ranged in age from 13 to 19, all should have had at least seven years of education; however, only 37% reported seven or more years, and 31% had fewer than five years of education. Nearly two-thirds of adolescents had had sexual education at school or outside school. Seventy-six percent of young men reported having had a partner in the past two years, and 47% had had a sexual partnership during that period.

Partnership Types and Trajectories

Of the 2,417 partnerships reported by 1,096 respondents, 49% involved sexual intercourse (Table 2). A greater proportion of nonsexual partnerships than of sexual partnerships were described as steady (52% vs. 43%). Similarly, a greater proportion of nonsexual partners than of sexual partners were considered girlfriends (63% vs. 48%), suggesting that the link between romantic attachment and sexual activity is not always clear cut.

The meaning of "steady" and "casual" relationships was subjectively interpreted by respondents, and some degree of misclassification cannot be ruled out, given the retrospective nature of the information; however, patterns of partnership duration were consistent with expectations. On average, steady relationships lasted 4.7 months, whereas casual relationships lasted 1.6 months. In addition, the distribution of casual partnerships was highly skewed toward very short durations, with half lasting less than one month (not shown). Furthermore, the average difference in duration between casual and steady relationships was larger for sexual partnerships (1.7 vs. 6.3 months) than for nonsexual partnerships (1.3 vs. 3.4 months). These differentials cannot be considered large, however, because even partnerships that adolescents labeled as steady were short-lived. Thus, the data suggest that transitory relationships are the norm during adolescence.

The time from beginning a relationship to engaging in sexual activity tends to be quite short: In 41% of sexual partnerships, intercourse took place the same day or the same week the relationship started (not shown). On average, the courtship period before sexual intimacy was longer with steady partners than with casual partners, but even in steady relationships, it lasted less than one month for 68% of adolescents. These data suggest that most adolescents have only a superficial knowledge of their partners before engaging in sexual activity and hence are ill-equipped to make an adequate assessment of HIV risk.

About half (51%) of the adolescents surveyed reported one or no relationships during the previous two years (Table 3); 15% reported four or more partners. As expected, the number of partners increased with age, but even among the oldest adolescents, more than half (57%) reported having had fewer than three relationships in the two-year period. When we restricted the analysis to sexual partnerships, nine in 10 had had fewer than three sexual partnerships in the previous two years (not shown).

Adolescents may follow many possible patterns in terms of partnerships; however, for this analysis, we grouped them into four categories: no partnership, only nonsexual partnerships, only sexual partnerships, and both nonsexual and sexual partnerships. Overall, more than half of male adolescents had experienced only one type of partnership (29% nonsexual only and 26% sexual only—Table 3) and 21% had experienced both types. As it is common for adolescents to have several nonsexual partners before engaging in sexual activity,18 the typical transition would be from a nonsexual partnership to a sexual partnership. This sequence would fit with the widespread assumption that once the transition to sexual activity is made, adolescents continue to be sexually active with all subsequent partners. Although that is the dominant pattern, 31% of sexually experienced respondents reported moving from a sexual partnership to a nonsexual partnership (not shown). This unexpected path suggests that the decision to become sexually involved with a partner is conditioned not only by prior sexual experience, but also by the context of each specific relationship and, presumably, by partners' decisions.

In analyses of partnerships by degree of commitment, 22% of male adolescents reported only casual relationships, 27% only steady relationships and 27% both types. As expected, the proportion of respondents who reported both casual and steady relationships increased with age, from 16% among 13–15-year-olds to 41% among 18–19-year-olds.

Adolescents' contraceptive use practices show a high degree of consistency across partnership types.† Overall, 26% of male adolescents reported only protected sexual partnerships, 14% reported only unprotected partnerships and 7% reported both. The proportion who reported consistently using contraceptives increased with age (from 11% among 13–15-year-olds to 45% among 18–19-year olds); however, the proportion consistently not using contraceptives also increased with age (from 8% among 13–15-year-olds to 19% among 18–19-year olds). Among adolescents who experienced both protected and unprotected sexual relationships, the predominant sequence was from an unprotected to a protected sexual partnership; only 9% moved in the opposite direction (not shown).

In analyses of calendar data examining whether respondents had participated in concurrent partnerships, 10% of male adolescents reported having had simultaneous or overlapping relationships during the previous two years (Table 3); the proportion increased with age, from 6% among 13–15-year-olds to 16% among 18–19-year olds. Overall, 4% had had concurrent sexual relationships; the proportion rose from 1% among 13–15-year-olds to 9% among 18–19-year-olds. The data suggest that although a large proportion of adolescent partnerships are of a casual nature, implying low emotional attachment and weak commitment, concurrent relationships are relatively rare; the dominant pattern is one of serial monogamy.

Potential vs. Actual Risk Exposure

To assess respondents' risk status during the past two years, we combined partnership, sexual and contraceptive calendar data. For each respondent, we divided the 25-month calendar period into time spent in four states: not in a partnership; in a partnership, with no sexual activity; in a partnership, with sexual activity protected by contraceptive use; and in a partnership, with unprotected sexual activity.

On average, male adolescents spent 18.7 months of the study period outside a partnership (Figure 1). Of the remaining time, 2.8 months were spent within a sexual partnership—during more than half (1.7 months) of that time, they were protected by contraceptive use, and during the remainder (1.1 months), they were unprotected by contraceptive use and exposed to sexual health risks. The duration of exposure increased with age, from 0.4 months among 13–15-year-olds to 2.4 months among 18–19-year-olds. Thus, our data suggest that adolescent exposure to risk might be lower than generally assumed, although even short exposure to unprotected sexual activity is a cause of concern, as it can have serious and long-term consequences for sexual health.

Multivariate Findings

In our initial multivariate analysis, age was the factor most strongly associated with male adolescents having had at least one partnership in the past two years (Table 4): Compared with 13–15-year-olds, those aged 16–17 and 18–19 had significantly elevated odds of having had a partnership during that period (odds ratios, 3.3 and 7.8, respectively). Adolescents who had started dating before age 13 were more likely than others to have had a recent partnership (2.8). The odds of having experienced a recent partnership were elevated among adolescents with five or more years of education, nonwhites, Catholics and those with 12 or more household assets (1.4–2.0).

Among respondents with recent partnership experience, those who had started dating before age 13 had higher odds of having had sex with their current or most recent partner than did those whose first date was at a later age (odds ratio, 1.3—Table 5). Also, adolescents who reported having had at least one former sexual partnership in the past two years had four times the odds of those who had had only nonsexual partnerships of having had sex with their current or most recent partner. And although there was no significant difference between those currently involved in a casual relationship and those involved in a steady relationship, respondents who considered their current or most recent partner a girlfriend were less likely than those who considered their partner a friend to have had sex with her (0.4). Having a partner who was three or more years younger was associated with decreased odds of being sexually involved (0.5); conversely, having a partner who was three or more years older was associated with increased odds of being sexually involved (3.2).

Several social and demographic variables were associated with adolescent males being sexually engaged with their current or most recent partner. As in previous analyses, age was a significant factor, with 16–17-year-olds and 18–19-year-olds having elevated odds of being sexually involved (2.4 and 6.5, respectively). Young men who declared no religious affiliation and Catholics were more likely than adolescents of other denominations (including Evangelicals) to report sexual activity in their current or most recent partnership (2.9 and 2.0, respectively).

In analyses of condom use at last sexual intercourse, early sexual and contraceptive experiences appear to be associated with current contraceptive behavior (Table 6, page 68). Respondents who practiced contraception at their sexual debut had elevated odds of having used condoms at last sexual intercourse (odds ratio, 7.9). Adolescents who had practiced contraception with past sexual partners were more likely than those who had not to have used condoms at last sex (6.5). These results confirm our descriptive observations and suggest a high level of continuity in contraceptive behavior across partnerships and over time.

Several factors related to the current relationship context were associated with recent condom use. Being involved in a steady relationship and having a partner who was introduced by a member of one's family were associated with decreased odds of condom use (0.6 and 0.5, respectively). Together, these findings suggest that familiarity with one's partner before the beginning of the relationship discourages protective behavior. With regard to the social and demographic variables, having seven or more years' education was significantly associated with condom use (1.8).

DISCUSSION

The formation of close relationships and the development of sexual intimacy are important components in the emotional and social maturation of adolescents. This article has analyzed the sexual and contraceptive behavior of male adolescents in Recife, Brazil, within the broader context of partnership trajectories to explore the links between adolescents' partnership behavior and their vulnerability to health risks.

Our findings cast some doubts on the widespread image of adolescents as "risk-takers."19 Within the two-year study period, most of the respondents entered into one or more partnerships. Casual, steady, romantic and nonromantic partnerships were all common, and relationships were generally sporadic and brief. However, the respondents typically spent a large fraction of the study period outside of a partnership, and half of all their partnerships did not involve sexual intercourse. Also, few adolescents reported having had more than two sexual partnerships or a concurrent sexual partnership during the study period.

Although caution is advisable because of potential misreporting, the data we collected using month-by-month partnership, sexual and contraceptive calendars suggest that sexual health risks are often overestimated when all sexually experienced adolescents are considered exposed to risk or when exposure is assumed to be continuous after first sexual intercourse. Because adolescents have relatively few partnerships, many of which are nonsexual, and because most partnerships do not last long, adolescent sexual activity is sporadic. Thus, actual exposure to risk (i.e., based on true duration of unprotected sexual partnerships) may be considerably lower than potential exposure to risk (i.e., from sexual initiation onward).

In a world radically changed by HIV/AIDS, the risk framework dominates the discourse of adolescence in demographic research.20 Although the focus on sexual risks has proved extremely useful in promoting prevention efforts, approaching adolescent sexual behavior simply in terms of health risks may prove too narrow to truly understand this important aspect of adolescent development.21 In many disadvantaged contexts, poverty, lack of educational and economic opportunities, unequal gender norms and inadequate access to health care may jeopardize adolescent health and well-being to a greater extent than sexual behavior.22 Our findings do not challenge the usefulness of the risk approach, but suggest the need to improve our understanding of adolescent partnership dynamics to develop more accurate measures of actual risk exposure.

Exploring links among early, recent and current partnership experiences provides insight on adolescent sexual behavior. Congruent with a life course perspective, early initiation of dating or sexual intercourse and contraceptive behavior at sexual debut were found to have implications for subsequent behavior. In addition, a certain continuity can be observed in male adolescent sexual and contraceptive behavior across successive partnerships, despite individual trajectories. Of particular relevance is the finding that adolescents who had practiced contraception in prior partnerships were more likely than others to protect themselves and their partner in their current or most recent sexual relationship. Reproductive health programs, hence, should reinforce this pattern of sustained contraceptive protection regardless of partner change.

Although prior partnership patterns have a considerable effect on how adolescents handle their subsequent relationships, decisions regarding sexual intimacy and contraceptive protection are also conditioned by the specific context of each particular relationship.23 According to our findings, male adolescents were less likely to use condoms in a steady partnership than in a casual partnership. Public health campaigns may need to account for the fact that the degree of emotional involvement in a relationship shapes adolescents' evaluation of risk. In the context of a steady relationship, not only do perceived risks tend to be low, but feelings of love and trust can act as a barrier to condom use.24 However, the prevailing pattern of rapid transition to sexual intimacy and rapid break-up implies that, even in the context of a steady partnership, most male adolescents have a superficial knowledge of their partners and are therefore ill-equipped to make an adequate assessment of HIV risk.

Study Limitations

This study is subject to several limitations. First, because the survey data were collected entirely in the slums of Recife, the results cannot be generalized to the overall Brazilian male adolescent population. The focus on disadvantaged neighborhoods is, however, justified by the strong link between early sexual initiation, risk of HIV infection and poverty in Brazil.25 Second, partnership, sexual and contraceptive retrospective histories place heavy demands on the memories of respondents and may be subject to recall error. In particular, respondents may forget or fail to report brief, casual relationships. To minimize these errors, a month-by-month calendar with visual cues was used to help respondents recall the timing and sequencing of events.26 Third, sensitive or socially censured behaviors, such as unprotected sexual activity or concurrent partnerships, may have been systematically misreported.27 Nonetheless, a series of internal checks made on the survey data showed them to be internally consistent across questionnaire modules.28

Conclusions

In brief, many features of adolescent partnerships, such as short duration, a high prevalence of casual relationships, brief courtship before sexual involvement, limited contraceptive use and inadequate assessment of HIV risks, increase adolescents' vulnerability to health risks. Other features, however, such as sporadic dating, a high prevalence of nonsexual partnerships and relatively infrequent and intermittent sexual intercourse, limit actual exposure to health risks, particularly in early and middle adolescence. It is important for prevention programs to have an accurate portrait of adolescent partnership dynamics, an adequate understanding of the actual and symbolic space sexuality—and health—occupy in adolescent lives and a realistic estimation of actual exposure to risk, so that interventions and messages can be tailored to adolescents' realities and perceptions.

Footnotes

* Nonsexual partnerships are defined as those in which respondents reported no penetrative sex, although partners could have had some intimacy of a sexual nature.

† The intervention, named Proteger, was a peer-led outreach program that lasted 15 months. Adolescent educators were recruited from the community and trained to convey information on sexual and reproductive health issues and to promote and distribute condoms among their peers.

‡ Although the asset summing approach has the disadvantage that all items have equal weights, this simple measure has been shown to be a reliable predictor of the impact of economic well-being on fertility and human capital outcomes in developing countries (source: Bollen KA, Glanville JL and Stecklov G, Economic status proxies in studies of fertility in developing countries: does the measure matter? Carolina Population Center, <http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/pdf/wp-01-38.pdf&gt;, accessed Dec. 5, 2005). We also performed an exploratory principle component analysis, but the first principal component described only 18.3% of the total variance of the original 18 items.

References

1. Blanc AK and Way AA, Sexual behavior, contraceptive knowledge and use, Studies in Family Planning, 1998, 29(2):106–116; Singh S et al., Gender differences in the timing of first intercourse: data from 14 countries, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2000, 26(1):21–28; Bozon M, At what age do women and men have their first sexual intercourse? World comparisons and recent trends, Population and Societies, 2003,No.391, pp. 1–4; and Gupta N, Sexual initiation and contraceptive use among adolescent women in Northeast Brazil, Studies in Family Planning, 2000, 31(3):228–238.

2. Kiragu K, Youth and HIV/AIDS: can we avoid catastrophe? Population Reports, 2001, Series L, No. 12.

3. United Nations (UN), Report on the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, 5–13 September 1994, New York: UN, 1995; UNICEF, UNAIDS and World Health Organization (WHO), Young People and HIV/AIDS: Opportunity in Crisis, 2000,<http://www.unicef.org/publications/pub_youngpeople_hivaids_en.pdf&gt;, accessed Dec. 5, 2005; and UNFPA, State of the World Population 2003: Investing in Adolescents' Health and Rights, 2003, <http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2003/pdf/english/swp2003_eng.pdf&gt;, accessed Dec. 5, 2005.

4. Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), In Their Own Right: Addressing the Sexual and Reproductive Health Needs of Men Worldwide, New York: AGI, 2003.

5. Berqúo E and Cavenaghi S, Increasing adolescent and youth fertility in Brazil: a new trend or a one-time event? paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Philadelphia, PA, USA, Mar. 30–Apr. 2, 2005; and Gupta N and Leite ID, Adolescent fertility behavior: trends and determinants in northeastern Brazil, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1999, 25(3):125–130.

6. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), AIDS Surveillance in the Americas, 2002, , accessed Dec. 5, 2005.

7. Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Programa Nacional de DST e AIDS, Boletím Epidemiológico AIDS e DST, Jan.–June 2004, 2005, <http://www.aids.gov.br/main.asp?View={B3D81676-232D-4BA2-BCAF-E5818234301B}>, accessed Dec. 5, 2005 (in Portuguese).

8. Marins JR et al., Dramatic improvement in survival among adult Brazilian AIDS patients, AIDS, 2003, 17(11):1675–1682.

9. Ministério da Saúde, 2005, op. cit. (see reference 7).

10. Bacon O et al., HIV/AIDS in Brazil, San Francisco, CA, USA: AIDS Policy Research Center, University of California, 2004.

11. Béria J, Ficar, Transar… A Sexualidade do Adolescente em Tempos de AIDS, Porto Alegre, Brazil: Tomo Editorial, 1998 (in Portuguese); and Levinson RA, Sadigursky C and Erchak GM, The impact of cultural context on Brazilian adolescents' sexual practices, Adolescence, 2004, 39(154):203–227.

12. Furman W, Brown B and Feiring C, eds., The Development of Romantic Relationships in Adolescence, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

13. UNFPA, 2003, op. cit. (see reference 3).

14. Furman W, Brown B and Feiring C, 1999, op. cit. (see reference 12).

15. Bozon M, 2003, op. cit. (see reference 1).

16. AGI, 2003, op. cit. (see reference 4).

17. World Bank, Attacking Brazil's Poverty: A Poverty Report with a Focus on Urban Poverty Reduction Policies, Washington, DC: World Bank, 2001.

18. Furman W, Brown B and Feiring C, 1999, op. cit. (see reference 12).

19. Juarez F and Castro Martín T, Reproductive health in Latin America: are all adolescents risk takers? paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC, Mar. 27–29, 1997.

20. Corrêa S and Parker E, Sexuality, human rights and demographic thinking: connections and disjunctions in a changing world, Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 2004, 1(1):1–24.

21. Fortenberry JD, Adolescent sex and the rhetoric of risk, in: Romer D, ed., Reducing Adolescent Risk: Toward an Integrated Approach, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2003, pp. 293–300.

22. Mensch BS, Clark WH and Nguyen Ahn D, Adolescents in Vietnam: looking beyond reproductive health, Studies in Family Planning, 2003, 34(4):249–262.

23. Gebhardt WA, Kuyper L and Greunsven G, Need for intimacy in relationships and motives for sex as determinants of adolescent condom use, Journal of Adolescent Health, 2003, 33(3):154–164.

24. Juarez F and Castro Martín T, Safe sex versus safe love? Relationship context and condom use among male adolescents in the favelas of Recife, Brazil, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2006, 35(1):25–35; and Longfield K, Klein M and Berman J, Criteria for Trust and How Trust Affects Sexual Decision-making Among Youth, Research Division Working Papers, Washington, DC: Population Services International, 2002.

25. Bastos FI and Szwarcwald CL, AIDS e pauperização: principais conceitos e evidências empíricas, Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 2000, 16(Suppl. 1):65–76; and Goldstein DM, Laughter out of Place: Race, Class, Violence and Sexuality in a Rio Shantytown, Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press, 2003.

26. Ali MM and Cleland J, Sexual and reproductive behaviour among single women aged 15–24 in eight Latin American countries: a comparative analysis, Social Science & Medicine, 2005, 60(6):1175–1185.

27. Fenton KA et al., Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research, Sexually Transmitted Infections, 2001,77(2): 84–92.

28. Juarez F and LeGrand T, Factors influencing boys' age at first intercourse and condom use in the shantytowns of Recife, Brazil, Studies in Family Planning, 2005, 36(1):57–70.

Author's Affiliations

Fatima Juarez is professor-researcher, Centre for Demographic Studies and Urban Planning, El Colegio de Mexico, Mexico City. Teresa Castro Martín is research scientist, Department of Demography, Institute of Economics and Geography, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge their project partners in Brazil, Fundação Joaquin Nabuco and BEMFAM, which collaborated in designing the intervention, collecting data, and recruiting interviewers. This project was supported by a grant from the Department for International Development (UK) to Fatima Juarez. The participation of Teresa Castro Martín was supported by grant BSO2003-00623 from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Guttmacher Institute.
3206206.pdf