Health Professionals' Perceptions About Induced Abortion in South Central and Southeast Asia

Susheela Singh, Guttmacher Institute Deirdre Wulf Heidi Jones

First published online:

Abstract / Summary

Although the legal status and the availability of induced abortion are highly variable in South Central and Southeast Asia, findings from a 1996 survey of 232 knowledgeable health professionals indicate that women of all socioeconomic levels obtain abortions, and many procedures take place in settings that may increase the risks to the woman's health. Overall, the vast majority of nonpoor urban women seeking abortions are believed to go to medically trained providers; however, roughly one-third to one-half of poor women in both urban and rural areas turn to a wide range of nonmedical providers or induce their abortion themselves. Of all women having abortions in these countries, about one-third are thought to experience medical complic ations, and only about half of these are hospitalized for treatment; thus, an estimated one in seven women having an abortion are hospitalized for the treatment of complications. The estimated abortion rate of 30 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 suggests that each year, 3% of women in South Central and Southeast Asia have an abortion; therefore, according to the survey results, about 1% are likely to suffer medical complications.

(International Family Planning Perspectives, 23:59-67 & 72, 1997)

In developing countries, induced abortion is a generally undocumented, often ignored and frequently dangerous procedure obtained by millions of women. In parts of the world where abortion is illegal or allowed only on very narrow grounds, or where it is l egal but difficult to obtain, many women go to extreme measures to avoid unwanted births. These measures often involve clandestine abortions performed under unsanitary conditions and by unskilled practitioners using dangerous techniques. Unsafe abortions put many women at grave risk of impaired health and, sometimes, of dying.

During the years leading up to and following the 1994 United Nations International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo, increased global attention was given to the adverse health implications of the widespread use of clandestine abortion in many parts of the developing world. However, the lack of reliable information on abortion has hampered the design of effective policies, programs and strategies to address the issue. Health planners need better information about morbidity and mortality ri sks related to clandestine abortion, in order to provide women with improved treatment and with appropriate postabortion care, including contraceptive counseling and services. Better knowledge of the reasons women have abortions will enable health care pl anners to identify subgroups of women who are in need of improved access to fertility control.

Health researchers recognize that levels of clandestine abortion in Asia are high;1 however, very little reliable information is available about practices there. This article looks at the conditions under which women in South Central and Southeast Asia have induced abortions, as reported in a survey of health professionals across the region. The approach taken here parallels that used in an earlier study carried out in Latin America.2

The legal status of abortion varies widely among the countries of Southeast and South Central Asia, and even where abortion is legal, a range of complex service systems operate. Of the nine countries that make up Southeast Asia, only two —Singapore a nd Vietnam —permit abortion on request. In five —Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar and the Philippines —induced abortion is permitted only to save the life of a pregnant woman. In Indonesia, however, qualified physicians are permitted to offer menstrual regulation services;3 and in Indonesia and the Philippines, although the laws on induced abortion are relatively restrictive, they are not strictly enforced.4 (Information on enforcement in the other countries is not available.)

In the two remaining countries of Southeast Asia, induced abortion can be performed on somewhat broader medical grounds —in Malaysia, for genetic reasons, to save a woman's life, or to preserve her physical or mental health; and in Thailand, in cases of rape or incest, or to save a woman's life or preserve her health. In Malaysia, the annual rate of legal abortion (based on registration of procedures by providers) is only about seven abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44, but in both countries, clandestine abortion is believed to be quite common.5

According to indirect estimates made by the World Health Organization (WHO) and others using a standardized methodology, 4.2 million abortions occur each year in Southeast Asia;6 1.3 million of these are performed in Vietnam and Singapore.7 Other estimates range so widely that at best they can give only a general indication of the incidence of abortion, but they suggest that the procedure is common in Indonesia (betw een 750,000 and 1.5 million annually), the Philippines (155,000-750,000) and Thailand (300,000-900,000).8 Little or nothing is known about the extent of abortion in Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar.

Of the eight countries of South Central Asia, only one —India —permits abortion under broad circumstances. In India, abortion in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy has been legal and an official government health service available on broad social a nd medical grounds since 1971. However, the level of access to government services is uneven. Various small-scale studies indicate that private doctors in India perform legal abortions for a fee not much higher than that charged in the public sector.9 In addition, other analyses find that very few private doctors report these procedures to the government data collection system.10 It is believed that roughly 6.7 million induced abortions are performed annually in India, even though only about 632,000 are reported in government statistics.11

In Bangladesh, menstrual regulation by vacuum aspiration is available as a public health measure up to 10 weeks' gestation; however, providers' reports suggest that it may be provided up to 12 weeks' gestation.12 Estimates of the number of procedures carried out each year range from 241,000 menstrual regulations in 198513 to 800,000 total abortions (menstrual regulations and other procedures) for the late 1970s.14

In Sri Lanka, where abortion is permitted only to save the life of the woman,15 the number of clandestine abortions has been estimated at 125,000-175,000 each year.16 In Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan, abortion is permitted only to save a woman's life, and in Nepal, it is permitted only if performed as a "benevolent" act (but the law does not define this term). Very little is known about the incidence of abo rtion in these four countries, and virtually no information is available for Bhutan.

WHO estimates that six million clandestine abortions occur annually in South Central Asia. Combining this estimate with the number of reported legal abortions, 7.4 million total abortions are estimated to occur in this subregion each year.

We report here on a survey undertaken in early 1996 of professionals in Southeast and South Central Asia who are knowledgeable about induced abortion. The objective was to gain insights into the conditions under which abortion is performed and the consequ ences of the procedure carried out in both legal and clandestine settings, by both medically trained personnel and traditional practitioners of varying skills, under both safe and unsafe medical conditions, and in both the private and the government secto rs. However, the findings reflect respondents' perceptions about conditions in their country and therefore paint only a general picture of abortion in these subregions.


The survey questioned a purposive sample of health professionals about various aspects of abortion: the methods used; the providers women go to; the probability that women having an abortion experience complications or are hospitalized for treatment if they have complications; where women seek treatment; the major reasons why women have abortions; and the differences in these factors between urban and rural women and between better-off and poor women. The questionnaire was designed to be self-administered and was pretested in Thailand and the Philippines.

With the help of various organizations* and researchers, we identified 374 potential respondents in all countries of Southeast and South Central Asia except Bhutan. To be eligible for inclusion, individuals had to have h ad direct experience treating abortion complications; providing abortions; formulating policy on the issue; administering health care services for women seeking abortions or being treated for abortion complications; or doing research on abortion.

The survey was mailed in January 1996, and then again in February to those who had not yet responded. Further follow-up of nonrespondents was carried out by fax and, in a small number of cases, by telephone. In all, 232 professionals completed the questio nnaire (see Table 1), for a response rate of 62%.

In India, we sought to include a particularly large number of information sources (96) because the country represents such a large proportion of the region's population. However, the response rate for India was especially low (39%), † and this affected the overall response rate: Excluding India, the response rate was 72%.

Because the questionnaire was in English (except in Thailand, where it was translated into Thai), some professionals who were knowledgeable about the topic but not highly educated or high-ranking may have been deterred from participating. This problem may have been especially pronounced in countries with no history of English-speaking colonial rule (Afghanistan, Iran, Nepal, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos and Vietnam). In the remainder, there is a greater probability that individuals in all socioeconomic strat a have some facility with English.

To be able to present results at a more detailed level than the subregional, we grouped together some countries with similar demographic and cultural profiles and few respondents: Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan; Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia; and Sri Lanka a nd Malaysia. (The last two, although they are in different subregions, are similar in that both are characterized by low desired family size, fertility, and infant and maternal mortality rates, and by high levels of contraceptive use.) Nepal, with 12 resp ondents, could not be grouped with India, where abortion is legal, or with Pakistan, which has a very different cultural and religious setting, and therefore is presented separately. Vietnam, with only seven respondents, is also shown separately, because the fact that abortion is legal and accessible makes it deserving of independent attention. Singapore, where abortion also is legal and available, is otherwise too different from Vietnam to be grouped with it; therefore, the respondent from Singapore was included in the regional grouping but not in any country grouping.

Where the numbers of respondents are quite small, the results provide only an approximate picture of actual conditions. In addition, even in countries represented by the largest numbers of participants, the majority were from urban areas; thus, the findin gs are likely to yield a more accurate profile of conditions in urban than in rural areas. Overall and subregional results are presented as averages weighted according to each country's proportion of the region's women aged 15-44.17

In all, 68% of respondents were medical service providers (Table 1); most of these were doctors, and a small number were midwives, nurses and other health care workers. Some 13% of participants were health administrators or policymakers, and 19% were rese archers or professors. Medical and nonmedical participants' responses to key questions were compared and found to be extremely similar, suggesting that the variation in participants' occupations by country did not significantly affect the comparability of results.

Most respondents had a medical degree (76%) or other postgraduate degree (15%); 6% were nurses, and the remaining 3% had a bachelor's degree. Overall, about half were employed in the public sector, and about half had at some time worked for six months or more in a rural area of their country. The mean age of all respondents was 47 years; this mean varied from 40 to 54. Most respondents had gained their experience with abortion in a hospital setting (72%), but substantial proportions had acquired it in a c linic or health center (45%), or through private practice (36%); variability across countries was by far greatest in the last two groups.


Commonly Used Abortion Methods

Respondents were presented with a comprehensive list of abortion methods and were asked to check off all those used in their country. Between eight and nine out of 10 mentioned vacuum aspiration and dilatation and curettage (D&C), and roughly six in 1 0 mentioned insertion of a catheter, massage, teas and other traditional methods. One-half reported that hormonal methods (prostaglandins, introduced vaginally or orally) were in use. Respondents also mentioned a wide range of herbal and other natural sub stances, manufactured products and physical techniques used to induce abortions.

Table 2 presents a summary of the methods believed to be most commonly used by physicians and by nonphysicians. Overall, two-thirds of respondents said that physicians commonly use vacuum aspiration or menstrual regulation ‡ and D&C. Generally, D&C is perceived to be used more often, and the difference is often considerable (as in Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan; Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia; the Philippines; Thailand; and Vietnam). Only in Bangladesh and Indonesia is the use of vacuum aspiration or menstrual regulation thought to be much more common than the use of D&C.

Almost two in 10 health professionals said that doctors sometimes provide or prescribe prostaglandins or injectables to induce abortion. In the Philippines, the use of these methods is believed to exceed that of vacuum aspiration or menstrual regulation, and to equal that of D&C.

The responses describing methods used by nonphysicians were less consistent and more wide-ranging. The most frequently cited methods overall were objects (other than a catheter) inserted into the vagina or uterus, followed by indigenous methods based on h erbal solutions. Respondents from South Central Asia most often reported that the insertion of foreign objects into the vagina is a common traditional method. In the Philippines, the catheter was cited as by far the most common method used by nonphysicia ns, but for Southeast Asia as a whole (and particularly in Indonesia and Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia), massage was the most frequently identified traditional method.

In countries where a substantial proportion of doctors are believed to prescribe hormones (Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan; India; and the Philippines), nonphysicians are also thought to administer these methods, which are available over the counter, quite frequently. However, in Bangladesh and Nepal, where the use of hormonal prescriptions is thought to be almost nonexistent among physicians, nonphysicians are sometimes believed to administer these methods. In Vietnam, the use of traditional methods by no nphysicians is thought to be negligible, but roughly three-quarters of both physicians and nonphysicians are believed to perform vacuum aspiration (not shown).

A Wide Range of Providers

There is a perhaps outdated general impression that where abortion is not legal, poor or rural women wanting to terminate an unwanted pregnancy must turn to unskilled practitioners working in unsanitary settings and using dangerous or ineffective methods. Another common misperception is that all better-off women seeking an abortion in these regions can obtain a safe medical procedure. While neither of these extremes is entirely accurate, a woman's access to abortion services probably depends largely on wh ere she lives and how great her financial resources are. Therefore, we assessed the options available to four groups of women: nonpoor urban and rural women, and poor urban and rural women.§ Respondents were asked to estimate what percentage of women seeking an abortion use doctors; nurses or midwives; untrained traditional providers; pharmacists; and self-induced procedures. (In presenting the results, we combine the last two categories because of the po tential for overlap and to simplify interpretation.)

As might be anticipated, respondents said that the majority of nonpoor urban women seeking an induced abortion go to physicians (80% in South Central and 61% in Southeast Asia—Table 3). Physicians also are thought to be the most common choice among n onpoor rural women (48% in South Central and 36% in Southeast Asia) and among poor urban women (48% and 33%, respectively). Also as expected, informants reported that among poor rural women in both subregions, lay practitioners are the most commonly used source (38-39%); however, a fair proportion of poor rural women are believed to obtain services from physicians (29% in South Central Asia and 22% in Southeast Asia).

It is of interest to examine this picture in the light of prevailing legal restrictions on abortion. In Vietnam, where abortion is a government health service, virtually no women, even those who are poor, resort to traditional providers. In Bangladesh, ho wever, where menstrual regulation is permitted, both poor urban and poor rural women seeking an abortion are very likely to go to a traditional provider. And in India, where abortion is legal but often difficult to obtain from government facilities, 36% o f abortions among poor rural women are thought to be provided by traditional practitioners. On the other hand, even in countries with stringent restrictions on abortion, the largest proportions of nonpoor urban women reportedly go to a doctor to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.

As for other sources of abortion, informants reported that nurses and midwives provide services to an estimated one in 10 nonpoor urban women and to roughly two in 10 of the other subgroups. In addition, some women induce their abortion themselves, using drugs purchased from a pharmacist or a variety of other methods (8-15%).

In summary, the results suggest that reliance on medically trained providers diminishes from urban to rural areas and from the nonpoor to the poor. Yet, even among nonpoor urban women, a surprisingly high proportion (about one in seven) obtain their abort ion from a traditional provider or induce it themselves. The patterns of nonpoor rural women and poor urban women are notably similar.

At the country level, a comparison of Vietnam and the Philippines highlights two contrasting scenarios. In all groups except the rural poor, Filipino women appear somewhat more likely than Vietnamese women to avail themselves of the services of nurses and trained midwives. However, 64-75% of poor women and of rural women seeking abortion in the Philippines are believed to use traditional practitioners or induce the abortion themselves, while almost all Vietnamese women, regardless of their poverty st atus or residence, are thought to go to skilled providers. Respondents believe that in Sri Lanka and Malaysia as well, physicians and other medically trained providers perform the vast majority of abortions among nonpoor urban women, poor urban women and nonpoor rural women.

India, because of its size and the fact that abortion is legal there, exerts a strong influence on the overall distribution by type of provider for South Central Asia. Thus, the proportion of nonpoor urban women seeking abortions who use doctors, nurses o r midwives is thought to be somewhat higher in South Central than in Southeast Asia (90% vs. 76%), largely because this proportion is very high in India (94%). And despite the legality of abortion, health professionals believe that one-quarter of poor urb an women seeking abortions and more than two in five poor rural women turn to lay practitioners or induce the abortion themselves.

A more unexpected finding is that among nonpoor women seeking abortions in Indonesia and in Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan, where abortion is legally very restricted, roughly three-quarters of those in urban areas and one-half of their rural counterparts obtain abortion services from physicians, nurses or trained midwives. Reliance on trained practitioners is believed to be relatively low in Nepal and in Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia, although even in these countries, about 60% of nonpoor urban and about 40% of nonpoor rural women seeking abortions are believed to obtain them from trained providers.

Medical Complications

The survey asked participants their perceptions about abortion-related complications that require medical treatment: incomplete abortions, excessive blood loss, damage to the vagina or cervix, perforation of the uterus, infection of the uterus and surroun ding area, and sepsis or septic shock. Participants were asked to estimate the proportion of women in each poverty and residence group who experience each of these complications if they obtain an abortion from the various kinds of provider.

Informants said that about one in 10 nonpoor urban women served by a physician experience complications. The average proportion for rural areas was higher—one in seven.** In urban areas, among both poor and nonpoor women, participants estimated that three in 10 women served by nurses or midwives, four in 10 going to a pharmacist for drugs, half of those using a lay practitioner and six in 10 of those who induce their own abortion experience a medical complication. T he risks associated with abortions performed by each type of provider were judged to be slightly higher in rural than in urban areas, but very similar for nonpoor and poor women.

Respondents believe that women who obtain abortifacient drugs from a pharmacy are likely to have a very high rate of medical complications. However, the survey did not ask specifically what types of drugs these might be. If they are prostaglandins, like m isoprostol, then the major risks are likely to be blood loss and possible infection from an incomplete abortion.18

To estimate the overall risk of abortion-related complications experienced by the four subgroups of women, we multiplied the proportion going to each type of provider by the proportion experiencing such complications, then summed the products for all five provider categories.Table 4 shows the results, including the weighted average for each country, each subregion and the entire sample.*†

The likelihood of serious health risk is lowest among nonpoor urban women and highest among their poor rural counterparts. The probable risk of medical complications is believed to be four in 10 among poor rural women having an induced abortion, three in 10 among the urban poor and the rural nonpoor, and two in 10 among the urban nonpoor.

At the subregional level, the pattern of risk varies little from the overall results, and women in both subregions are believed to have roughly the same risk of complications from induced abortion (32-34%). But at the country level, more diverse patt erns emerge. Again, the Philippines and Vietnam illustrate the extremes. In the Philippines, health professionals believe, about half of poor women having an abortion suffer medical complications, compared with four in 10 nonpoor rural women and three in 10 nonpoor urban women. In Vietnam, the risk is thought to be minimal among all groups.

By contrast, in each subgroup, the risk of complications is thought to be very similar in India and Thailand, even though abortion is legal in the first but not in the second. Finally, the estimate that only one-quarter of poor urban and nonpoor rural wom en in Sri Lanka and Malaysia who have abortions experience complications is not surprising, given respondents' belief that roughly three-quarters of these women who have abortions obtain them from medically trained practitioners.

Women in Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia are believed to have the highest risk of experiencing serious medical complications from an induced abortion (46%); those in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal and the Philippines are estimated to have a moderate risk (about 40%). As expected, Vietnamese women are thought to have the lowest risk (11%).

Hospitalization for Complications

In many areas of the developing world, the likelihood that a woman experiencing complications from an unsafe abortion will receive treatment for her condition may depend chiefly on whether she lives near a hospital or maternity clinic and whether she can afford to pay for services. Furthermore, out of fear or ignorance, women suffering abortion-related complications may be deterred from going to a hospital emergency room. Many might opt to stay at home and hope the condition will clear up without medical intervention, or might try to treat it by taking a modern or traditional drug. In addition, women with less serious complications may go to a private doctor and receive treatment that does not require hospitalization. For these reasons, the survey asked respondents to estimate women's chances of receiving treatment for abortion complications, according to their residence and poverty status.

Overall, informants estimated that between four and six in 10 women experiencing a complication from abortion will be hospitalized; the only substantial variation by subregion was found in estimates for poor rural women and nonpoor urban women (Table 4). By combining these data with the estimates of the proportion of women having an abortion who are likely to experience a serious complication, we obtained estimates of the proportion seeking an abortion who are thought to be hospitalized for complications. This proportion is relatively consistent, regardless of women's poverty status and residence: 12% of nonpoor urban women and 15-18% of others (Table 5). Therefore, although rural women probably have poorer access to hospitals than urban women, they are thought to have a higher complication rate and thus a generally similar rate of hospitalization for complications.

In the Philippines, nonpoor urban women having an abortion are believed to be hospitalized at almost twice the rate (22%) as the average for this subgroup. This estimate reflects perceptions that in the Philippines, these women have a high abortion-relate d complication rate and an above-average chance of hospitalization. In fact, for all four subgroups, perceived hospitalization rates in the Philippines are higher than the subregional averages. Similarly, respondents in Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia, in Sri Lanka and Malaysia and in Thailand reported that poor rural women having an abortion are more likely than average to be hospitalized.

Only in Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan and in Indonesia do health professionals believe that poor rural women having an abortion are less likely than all other groups to be hospitalized. (The same appears to be true in Vietnam, but the proportion is based on too few responses to be meaningful.) In Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan, this difference results from the respondents' view that poor rural women are much less likely than poor urban women to be within reach of a hospital, given that the two groups are estimated to run very much the same risk of experiencing medical complications from an abortion (30-33%). And in Indonesia, where poor rural women are thought to have an even higher probability of complications (44%), their access to hospitals is al so perceived to be much lower than average.

Because the likelihood of hospitalization depends on the accessibility of services, rather than on the type of provider or women's socioeconomic status, it varies less within and between countries than the likelihood of complications. The country averages range from less than one in 10 in Vietnam and in Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan to about one in four both in Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia and in the Philippines. At the subregional and regional levels, an estimated one in seven women having abortions are hospitalized for a medical complication.

Use of Public Health Sources

The respondents were asked to assess whether women with abortion complications commonly, sometimes or rarely seek treatment from government and private hospitals and clinics; doctors' and nurses' offices and homes; trained and untrained traditional birth attendants' homes; and pharmacies, dispensaries and drugstores. Overall, four in five respondents think that poor women commonly use public hospitals or clinics, whereas close to half believe that nonpoor women commonly use these sources.

By subregion, participants differed only in their perceptions about nonpoor rural women. Some two-thirds of those from Southeast Asia believe that these women go to a public hospital or clinic if they have an abortion complication, compared with fewer than half of those in South Central Asia. This finding suggests that nonpoor rural women in South Central Asia may be more likely than their Southeast Asian counterparts to seek care from private sources. Given that in India, respondents believe that about three out of five nonpoor and one in three poor rural women seeking abortions go to physicians, this seems plausible.

Why Women Have Abortions

Respondents were given a list of the most common reasons for women to seek an abortion and were asked to rate each as very frequent, frequent, somewhat frequent or infrequent. Broadly, overwhelming proportions of respondents in both subregions reported that unplanned pregnancy is a very frequent or frequent reason for women to have an induced abortion. More specifically, a variety of reasons may explain why a woman would not welcome a pregnancy —predominantly, economic diffulties (63-68%).

The only other choice listed by a substantial proportion of informants was that the woman was not married, but this reason carried far less weight in South Central than in Southeast Asia. This contrast may result from the societal assumption in much of South Central Asia that women simply do not have intercourse before marriage. (Age at marriage is quite low in this subregion —ranging from 14.1 years in Bangladesh to 18.1 in Pakistan19 —and adolesce nt girls are closely supervised by their families.)

Small proportions of participants think that women frequently or very frequently have abortions because of their young age or because they have learned that the fetus is deformed. Protection of the life of the pregnant woman is thought to be a significan t factor in Bangladesh, Indonesia and Vietnam (one-third to one-half). Only in India and Nepal do substantial proportions of respondents perceive rape or incest as a frequent reason for abortion (close to one in four).

What is known about childbearing aspirations and patterns of contraceptive practice in these countries? Table 6 summarizes pertinent findings from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys in the seven study countries that have had such a survey. A c omparison of the total fertility rate and desired family size suggests that women in Bangladesh, Pakistan and the Philippines are having somewhat more children than they want; the reverse is true in India, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Thailand. The commonly h eld opinion that unplanned pregnancies are the major reason why women in these two subregions have abortions is consistent with the available data on levels of unplanned fertility: Some 24-47% of women in these countries reported that their last birt h was unplanned (i.e., not wanted at the time it occurred or not wanted at all).

What accounts for these rates of unplanned childbearing? In all of the countries except Sri Lanka and Thailand, 50-88% of women of childbearing age are not using any contraceptive method; 15-21% in the Philippines and Sri Lanka rely on tradition al methods (primarily withdrawal and periodic abstinence). Furthermore, large proportions of women stop using their method because of side effects, particularly in Bangladesh, Indonesia and Thailand (27-41%). Additionally, in most of these countries, roughly 20% of women aged 15-44 have an unmet need for family planning.

In these circumstances, the chances are high that many women will face an unintended and often unwanted pregnancy, and that many will choose to have an abortion. Of the countries included in Table 6, the Philippines demonstrates perhaps the most overwhelm ing degree of family planning problems: Filipino women have nearly two children more than they would like, and an estimated 31% of Filipino women of reproductive age have an unmet need for contraception.20

Postabortion Counseling

Respondents were asked if they think that women receive contraceptive counseling either from their abortion provider or from staff at a hospital where they are treated for a complication. About one-fifth believe that most women in the region who have an a bortion obtain counseling from their provider, but about three-fifths believe that most women who are treated for a complication are counseled at that time. Vietnam and Indonesia stand out, with 50% of health professionals reporting that most women are co unseled by providers. In Bangladesh and India, the proportions who think that most women obtaining an abortion receive contraceptive counseling from the provider are unexpectedly low, given that menstrual regulation and abortion, respectively, are permitt ed.


Because of the wide range of countries, cultures and abortion situations represented in our study, it is not easy to make broad generalizations from the findings. Nevertheless, we can say with confidence that women of all socioeconomic levels in South Cen tral and Southeast Asia are obtaining abortions, primarily to terminate unplanned pregnancies, many of which are unwanted because of economic problems, and that these procedures are performed by practitioners with a wide range of skill and in greatly diff ering conditions of safety. The findings illuminate two aspects of the abortion issue in Asia: the impact of the procedure's legal status and availability, and the health problems likely to result from clandestine abortion.

Legality and Availability

The legal status and availability of abortion in these countries can be broadly categorized into four types of settings, which have an important impact on the conditions under which women obtain abortions:

Abortion is legal, and safe abortion services are available. Vietnam and Singapore are the only countries in our study that fit this description. The estimated complication rate in Vietnam is much lower than average for Southeast Asia. (The maternal mortality ratio also is much lower than the subregional average—105 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births compared with 330 per 100,000.21)

Abortion or menstrual regulation is legal, but the availability of safe abortion services is poor and many women obtain clandestine abortions. Only Bangladesh and India fall into this category. The proportion of women in Bangladesh who know tha t abortion is legal or where to obtain services is low.22 In addition, an estimated 25-33% of women seeking menstrual regulation from a provider with formal training in the method are rejected for variou s reasons, 87% of them because the pregnancy is too advanced.23 Furthermore, rural women are in purdah, which means that many cannot obtain this service unless female family welfare visitors are trained to pe rform menstrual regulation and are permitted to provide it at women's homes. Given these circumstances, it is not difficult to understand the high level of reliance on traditional methods and providers, and the high rates of complication and hospitalizati on.

In India, small-scale studies show that government providers may be uncaring toward women, fail to ensure confidentiality, require women to obtain the consent of their husbands (even though this is not legally necessary) and often require that women obtai ning an abortion accept sterilization or an IUD.24 Conditions such as these help explain why so few Indian women obtain abortions through the official health system.

Abortion is legally restricted, but a substantial proportion of procedures are performed by health professionals. Many of the countries in these subregions reflect this situation. For example, given the broad range of providers in Indonesia, ab ortion probably is widely used,25 despite large increases in contraceptive prevalence over the past 20 years. The proportion of women seeking abortion who are believed to obtain safe medical procedures varies widely by poverty status, but is higher than expected.

Likewise, in the Philippines, medical professionals provide abortions, although it is illegal to do so. However, the proportion of women seeking abortions who go to medically trained providers is believed to be lower in the Philippines than in any of the other countries in our study. The strong opposition to abortion voiced by several Filipino doctors participating in the survey—which generally reflects the attitudes of the Filipino medical community26—supports this perception.

Sri Lanka, Malaysia and Thailand, which are more economically advanced and have better health infrastructures than other Southeast Asian countries, illustrate that the safe medical provision of abortion can go a long way toward offsetting the potential se rious consequences of clandestine abortion. In these countries, urban women seeking abortions reportedly rely on medically trained providers with some frequency, and these providers are thought to use mainly safe methods (vacuum aspiration and D&C). I n addition, self-induced procedures are believed to be rare in urban areas. However, rural women and poor women often lack access to safe abortion services.

Abortion is highly restricted; the vast majority of procedures are clandestine, and a high proportion are unsafe. This is the case in Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan; Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia; and Nepal. Although the desire for large families is a widespread norm in these countries, abortion has been, and continues to be, a traditional practice; in some countries, it may be increasing in prevalence, especially in urban areas.27 However, large prop ortions of women seeking abortions, particularly those who are poor, go to traditional providers, and in some of these countries, the complication rate exceeds two-fifths of women having abortions.

Health Problems

The estimated annual abortion rate for the two subregions combined is 30 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44. The estimated rate is higher for Southeast Asia (36 per 1,000) than for South Central Asia (25 per 1,000), which is characterized by more t raditional and conservative cultural, social and religious norms, and is less developed and less far along in the demographic transition.28

The overall rate suggests that about 3% of women in Southeast and South Central Asia have an abortion each year.29 If, as our findings indicate, one-third of women who have an abortion experience a medical complication, then each year, one in every 100 women in these subregions are likely to suffer at least some loss of productive days (at their job or at home) or even die as a result of an abortion-related health problem. Only about half of the women who experience complications from abortion are believed to receive hospital care; most who do not probably get no medical treatment whatsoever.

Unsafe abortions exact a severe toll not only on women's health but also on their chances of survival. In South Central Asia, WHO estimates that the maternal mortality ratio due to abortion is 81 deaths per 100,000 live births, representing 14% of all maternal deaths, or an estimated 33,000 abortion-related deaths each year. For Southeast Asia, the ratio is 43 abortion-related deaths per 100,000 live births, and these deaths account for 13% of all maternal deaths, or an estimated 5,000 abortion-related deaths annually.30

One somewhat counterintuitive conclusion of our study is that in most countries, the proportion of women suffering abortion-related complications who are believed to receive treatment in a hospital is similar in rural and urban areas. What factors other than the possible overreporting of the likelihood of complications and hospitalization might account for these views? Do the respondents' perceptions reflect the belief that rural women's access to hospitals is generally as good as that of urban women in this part of the world? Or is the availability of hospital beds in rural areas overestimated by this predominantly urban sample?

The World Bank provides comparative country data on a health service indicator that may shed some light on the availability of hospital care: the number of people per hospital bed.31 Examination of the two most extreme cases supports the plausibility of survey responses to the question on hospitalization. In Indonesia, Pakistan and Afghanistan, where there are 1,502-2,945 people for every hospital bed, respondents believe that only one in four poor rural women with a severe medical complication (and slightly more than four in 10 poor urban women) will be hospitalized. By contrast, in Sri Lanka and Malaysia, where the population-to-bed-ratio is only 369-432 people per bed, an estimated eight in 10 poor rural women with complications (and nine in 10 poor urban women) are considered likely to be hospitalized.

A number of other considerations support the high estimates of likely hospitalization offered by health professionals in most countries. The density of population in some countries may mean that even rural women live close enough to a hospital that distance does not constitute a serious barrier to care. Furthermore, even in countries where access to hospitals is poor, abortion-related complications may be viewed as serious and life-threatening illnesses, and all possible efforts may be made to provide transportation to the nearest hospital for women suffering such complications. Finally, even poor women in urban areas have some access to private doctors and clinics. This factor might account for part of the perception that half to two-thirds of poor urban women in most countries, and almost all in Malaysia, receive treatment for abortion-related health complications.

While many women with serious abortion-related complications receive hospital treatment, our findings indicate a continuing need for improvements in access to such care. The findings also illustrate the need for improved contraceptive counseling, to be provided both by those who perform abortions and by those who treat complications. Few respondents believe that most women receive contraceptive counseling from their abortion provider, and although a substantial proportion think that most women hospitalized for abortion complications receive such counseling, findings from other studies suggest that the latter perception may reflect what should happen, rather than what does.32

At the very least, all medical and nonmedical staff likely to be involved in postabortion care should be trained to provide sensitive counseling and referrals to other appropriate reproductive health care services. Women must have access to a broad range of contraceptive methods at prices that they can afford. This would lead to improvements in effective contraceptive use and would give women greater freedom to implement their fertility preferences. Levels of unplanned pregnancy are high in Asia: Of all pregnancies in this region (excluding China), 18% end in abortions and 19% in unplanned births.33

Many of the abortion methods thought to be widely used in these two subregions of Asia were also cited in the Latin America survey.34 The consistency across these two very different regions suggests that knowledge of safe medical techniques among doctors may be worldwide, and that lacking better options, women the world over are likely to use similar kinds of traditional, and often highly unsafe, methods when faced with an unwanted pregnancy.

Physicians who provide abortion services are believed to use D&C almost as commonly as they use vacuum aspiration, a less-invasive and more cost-effective procedure. Although information was not obtained on whether physicians vary the procedure they use depending on the length of gestation, this result suggests that D&C may be used even when it is not the most appropriate method. Clearly, more physicians and paramedics must be trained in vacuum aspiration. This would be beneficial not only in countries where abortion is legal, but also in countries where abortion is legally restricted, because it would increase the chance that women hospitalized for abortion complications would be treated with this method when appropriate.

Because quantitative data on abortion are often nonexistent, many participants had great difficulty assessing the situation in their country. Furthermore, respondents living in countries in which public opinion is strongly opposed to abortion probably had had fewer opportunities to discuss the subject openly with their colleagues (e.g., in professional forums); as a result, their responses may have been based primarily on their personal experience. Finally, because the health professionals in this survey were largely urban-based (and even though about half had work experience in rural areas), the results describing probable conditions in rural areas must be considered less dependable than those concerning urban areas. Additional interviews of rural health professionals would have been a valuable supplement to this study.

Although the study represents only part of the search for better information about abortion in Asia, it points to a number of program and policy areas in which more in-depth research —especially at the country level —is needed. So long as the termination of unwanted pregnancies remains an unexamined and undocumented issue in this part of the world, policymakers and public officials can claim ignorance about the problem of clandestine abortion or, worse, deny its existence.


*In particular, the International Planned Parenthood Federation secretariat, London; International Projects Assistance Service, Carrboro, N.C., USA; Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, New York; Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique, London; Marie Stopes International, London; Médicins sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium; WHO, Geneva; and Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.

†Contact information for potential repondents in India came primarily from a list of participants at the United Nations' Fourth World Conference on Women, held in Beijing in 1995, and may have been less accurate than information provided directly by individuals.

‡While the use of these two terms may appear redundant, because the same medical procedure is used for both methods, a distinction has to be made between them. In Bangladesh and Indonesia, menstrual regulation is legal under precise criteria for gestational age and provider qualifications. Since menstrual regulation is performed at an early stage of pregnancy, it is sometimes done in the absence of a positive pregnancy test.

§Nonpoor women were described as "those who are, relatively speaking, better off," but were otherwise left to the respondent to define. "Urban" and "rural" were not defined.

**The question was worded in terms of how many out of 10 women would experience a complication; consequently, the answers may be biased upward. Some respondents who thought the fraction was between zero and one out of 10 are likely to have rounded up to one to avoid extreme underreporting. Additionally, since physicians know the most about possible complications, their responses are particularly likely to be biased upward.

In the absence of data on the distribution of women by income level according to residence, the educational level of women of reproductive age is used as a proxy for poverty level in weighting at the country and subregional levels. The assumption made is that women with incomplete primary schooling (5-7 years, depending on the country) are poor, and that women with higher levels of schooling are nonpoor. (The cutoff points were higher for the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Malaysia&151;9-10 years—because overall levels of education are much higher in these countries.) These distributions were obtained from data gathered for the Demographic and Health Surveys. In the absence of such survey data, we assigned Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia together the distribution of Pakistan; Vietnam the educational and residence distribution of Indonesia; and Nepal that of India.

The possibility of upward bias should be taken into consideration because respondents' direct experience with abortion-related complications may have led them to overestimate the prevalence of complications and the need for hospitalization.


1. Institute for Social Studies and Action, Conference on Attitudes and Perceptions Towards Induced Abortion, Quezon City, Philippines, Mar. 15, 1991; Task Force on Social Science and Reproductive Health and University of the Philippines Population Institute, Conference on Abortion: A Public Health Issue in the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines, Nov. 13, 1996; International Planned Parenthood Federation, East and Southeast Asia and Oceania Region Office, Country Experiences on Abortion, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1993; Parivar Seva Sanstha, Workshop on Service Delivery System in Induced Abortion, New Delhi, India, 1994; and "Women's Health in the Third World: The Impact of Unwanted Pregnancy," International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Supplement 3, 1989.

2. S. Singh and D. Wulf, "Estimated Levels of Induced Abortion in Six Latin American Countries," International Family Planning Perspectives, 20:4-13, 1994.

3. F.A. Moeloek et al., "The Relation Between Menstrual Regulation Service and the Incidence of Septic Abortions in Indonesia," paper presented at the Christopher Tietze International Symposium on Women's Health in the Third World: The Impact of Unwanted Pregnancy, Rio de Janeiro, Oct. 29-30, 1988.

4. United Nations (UN) Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis, Abortion Policies: A Global Review, Vols. 1, 2 and 3, New York, 1992, 1993 and 1995.

5. Ibid., Vol. 2, pp. 125-126, and Vol. 3, p. 125.

6. World Health Organization (WHO), Abortion: A Tabulation of Available Data on the Frequency and Mortality of Unsafe Abortion, Geneva, 1994, Table 3, p. 8; S. Singh and S.K. Henshaw, "The Incidence of Abortion: A Worldwide Overview Focusing on Methodology and on Latin America," paper presented at the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP) Seminar on Socio-Cultural and Political Aspects of Abortion from an Anthropological Perspective, Trivandrum, India, Mar. 25-28, 1996, Table 1.

7. D. Goodkind, "Abortion in Vietnam: Measurements, Puzzles and Concerns," Studies in Family Planning, 25:342-352, 1994; and S.K. Henshaw, "Induced Abortion: A World Review," Family Planning Perspectives, 22:76-89, 1990.

8. T.H. Hull, S.W. Sarwono and N. Widyantoro, "Induced Abortion in Indonesia," Studies in Family Planning, 24:241-251, 1993; M.J. de la Rosa and J. Martin, "Induced Abortion: Is It Really a Problem?" in Philippines Department of Health, Proceedings of the 1987 National Conference on Safe Motherhood, Manila, 1987, pp. 37-44; T. Narkavonnakit, "Abortion in Rural Thailand: A Survey of Practitioners," Studies in Family Planning, 10:223-229, 1979; and T. Narkavonnakit and T. Bennett, "Health Consequences of Induced Abortion in Rural Northeast Thailand," Studies in Family Planning, 12:58-65, 1981.

9. M.E. Khan, S. Barge and G. Philip, "Abortion in India: An Overview," paper presented at the IUSSP Seminar on Socio-Cultural and Political Aspects of Abortion from an Anthropological Perspective, Trivandrum, India, Mar. 25-28, 1996, p. 16.

10. S. Barge, M. Kine and S. Nair, "Situation Analysis of MTP Facilities in Gujarat," Centre for Operations Research and Training, Working Paper No. 4, 1994, pp. 2-3; and R. Chhabra and S.C. Nuna, Abortion in India: An Overview, Veerendra Printers, New Delhi, 1994, p. 63.

11. R. Chhabra and S.C. Nuna, 1994, op. cit. (see reference 10), Table 2, pp. 23-24, and Table 4, p. 27.

12. P. Sachdev, ed., International Handbook on Abortion, Greenwood Press, New York, 1988, p. 38.

13. S.F. Begum, H. Kamal and G.M. Kamal, Evaluation of MR Services in Bangladesh, Bangladesh Association for Prevention of Septic Abortion (BAPSA), Dhaka, 1987, Table 7.3, p. 45.

14. R.W. Rochat, S. Jabeen and M.J. Rosenberg, "Maternal and Abortion Related Deaths in Bangladesh, 1978-1979," International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 19:155-164, 1981; and A. Measham et al., "Complications from Induced Abortion in Bangladesh Related to Types of Practitioner and Methods, and Impact on Mortality," Lancet, I:199-202, 1981.

15. UN Population Division and Policy Analysis, Department of Economic and Social Information, 1996, op. cit. (see reference 4).

16. W.I. De Silva, "The Silent Cry: Socio-Cultural and Political Factors Influencing Induced Abortion in Sri Lanka," paper presented at the IUSSP Seminar on Socio-Cultural and Political Aspects of Abortion from an Anthropological Perspective, Trivandrum, India, Mar. 25-28, 1996.

17. UN Population Division, Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis, The Sex and Age Distribution of the Word Population: The 1994 Revision, New York, 1994.

18. S. Singh and D. Wulf, 1994, op. cit. (see reference 2).

19. S. Singh and R. Samara, "Early Marriage Among Women in Developing Countries," International Family Planning Perspectives, 22:148-157, 1996.

20. The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), Hopes and Realities: Closing the Gap Between Women's Aspirations and Their Reproductive Experiences, New York, 1995, Appendix Table 5, pp. 48-49; Appendix Table 6, pp. 50-51; and Appendix Table 7, pp. 52-53.

21. World Bank, Social Indicators of Development: 1996, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md., USA, 1996; and WHO, 1994, op. cit. (see reference 6).

22. H. Kamal et al., Utilization of Reproductive Health Care Services in Dhaka City, BAPSA, Dhaka, 1994, Tables 4.6-4.7, pp. 11-12.

23. Ibid., Table 5.11, p. 39; S.F. Begum, H. Kamal and G.M. Kamal, Evaluation of MR Services in Bangladesh, BAPSA, Dhaka, 1987; and G.M. Kamal and S.F. Begum, Study on Intervention Necessary for Preventing Rejection of MR Clients, BAPSA, Dhaka, 1990.

24. M.E. Khan, S. Barge and G. Philip, 1996, op. cit. (see reference 9), p. 15.

25. T.H. Hull, S.W. Sarwono and N. Widyantoro, 1993, op. cit. (see reference 8); and R.S. Samil, "Commentary on Menstrual Regulation as a Health Service: Challenges in Indonesia," International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Supplement 3, 1989, pp. 29-32.

26. A.B. Marcelo, "Attitudes and Perceptions Towards Induced Abortion: The Women, Professionals and the Public," paper presented at the Institute for Social Studies and Action Conference on Attitudes and Perceptions Towards Induced Abortion, Quezon City, Philippines, Mar. 15, 1991.

27. P.J. Thapa, S. Thapa and N. Shrestha, "A Hospital-Based Study of Abortion in Nepal," Studies in Family Planning, 23:311-318, 1992; F.F. Fikree, "The Emerging Problem of Induced Abortions in Squatter Settlements of Karachi, Pakistan," paper presented at the IUSSP Seminar on Socio-Cultural and Political Aspects of Abortion from an Anthropological Perspective, Trivandrum, India, Mar. 25-28, 1996; and P.A. Hunte, "Indigenous Methods of Fertility Regulation in Afghanistan," in L.F. Newman, ed., Women's Medicine: A Cross-Cultural Study of Indigenous Fertility Regulation, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J., USA, 1985, pp. 43-75.

28. S. Singh and S.K. Henshaw, 1996, op. cit. (see reference 6).

29. Ibid.

30. WHO, 1994, op. cit. (see reference 6), Table 3, p. 8.

31. World Bank, Social Indicators of Development: 1995, Washington, D.C., 1995.

32. G.S. Neamatalla and C.S. Verme, Postabortion Women: Factors Influencing Their Family Planning Options, AVSC Working Paper No. 19, AVSC International, New York, 1995; F.C. Greenslade et al., "Post-Abortion Care: A Woman's Health Initiative to Combat Unsafe Abortion," Advances in Abortion Care, Vol. 4, No. 1, IPAS, Carrboro, N.C., USA, 1994; and K.E. McLaurin et al., "Post-Abortion Family Planning: Reversing a Legacy of Neglect," Lancet, 342:1099-1100, 1993.

33. AGI, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 20), p. 25.

34. S. Singh and D. Wulf, 1994, op. cit. (see reference 2).


Susheela Singh is director of research, The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), New York; Deirdre Wulf is a freelance writer; at the time of the preparation of this article, Heidi Jones was senior research assistant, AGI. The following researchers contributed to the development of the list of respondents and fielding of the study on which this article is based: Napaporn Chayovan, Institute of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok; Haidary Kamal, Bangladesh Association for Prevention of Septic Abortion, Dhaka; Josefina Cabigon and Aurora Perez, Population Institute, University of the Philippines, Manila; and Shyam Thapa, Family Health International, Kathmandu, Nepal. The following individuals assisted with follow-up of nonrespondents in their respective countries: Bela Ganatra and George Philip, India; Firman Lubis, Indonesia; Fariyal Fikree, Pakistan; Indralal de Silva, Sri Lanka; and Iqbal Alam, Vietnam. Reina Nuñez, Erin Sullivan and Roberta Scheinmann of AGI provided research assistance. The research on which this article is based was supported by the World Bank. The findings and conclusions do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank.


The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Guttmacher Institute.