Early View

The Role of Public-Sector Family Planning Programs in Meeting the Demand for Contraception in Sub-Saharan Africa

CONTEXT

Commonly used indicators of contraceptive behavior in a population—modern contraceptive prevalence (mCPR), unmet need for contraception, demand for contraception and demand satisfied—are not well-suited for evaluating the progress made by government family planning programs in helping women and men achieve their reproductive goals.

METHODS

Trends in these measures in 26 Sub-Saharan African countries between 1990 and 2014 were examined. Trends in a proposed new indicator, the public-sector family planning program impact score (PFPI), and its relationship to mCPR and the family planning effort score were also assessed. Case studies were used to review public family planning program development and implementation in four countries (Nigeria, Ethiopia, Rwanda and Kenya).

RESULTS

The four commonly used indicators capture the extent to which women use family planning and to which demand is satisfied, but shed no direct light on the role of family planning programs. PFPI provides evidence that can be used to hold governments accountable for meeting the demand for family planning, and was closely related to policy developments in the four case-study countries.

CONCLUSIONS

PFPI provides a useful addition to the indicators currently used to assess progress in reproductive health and family planning programs.

Authors' Affiliations

John Bongaarts is vice president and distinguished scholar with the Population Council, New York, and Karen Hardee is senior associate and director of Evidence Project, the Population Council, Washington, DC.

Author contact: [email protected]

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Guttmacher Institute.

International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Support Our Work

Your support enables the Guttmacher Institute to advance sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and globally through our interrelated program of high-quality research, evidence-based advocacy and strategic communications.