Volume 45
Pages 1 - 12

Reproductive Autonomy and Modern Contraceptive Use at Last Sex Among Young Women in Ghana

CONTEXT

Variability in the conceptualization and measurement of women's empowerment has resulted in inconsistent findings regarding the relationships between empowerment and sexual and reproductive health outcomes. Reproductive autonomy—a specific measure of empowerment—and its role in modern contraceptive use have rarely been assessed in Sub-Saharan contexts.

METHODS

Survey data were collected from a sample of 325 urban Ghanaian women aged 15-24 recruited from health facilities and schools in Kumasi and Accra in March 2015. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine associations between two adapted reproductive autonomy subscales—decision making and communication—and women's use of modern contraceptives at last sex, controlling for demographic, reproductive and social context (i.e., approval of and stigma toward adolescent sexual and reproductive health) covariates.

RESULTS

In multivariable analyses, reproductive autonomy decision making—but not reproductive autonomy communication—was positively associated with women's modern contraceptive use at last sex (odds ratio, 1.1); age, having been employed in the last seven days and living in Kumasi were also positively associated with modern contraceptive use (1.1-9.8), whereas ever having had a previous pregnancy was negatively associated with the outcome (0.3). Reproductive autonomy decision making remained positively associated with contraceptive use in a subsequent model that included social approval of adolescent sexual and reproductive health (1.1), but not in models that included stigma toward adolescent sexual and reproductive health.

CONCLUSIONS

The reproductive autonomy construct, and the decision-making subscale in particular, demonstrated relevance for family planning outcomes among young women in Ghana and may have utility in global settings. Future research should explore reproductive autonomy communication and the potential confounding effects of social context.

Authors' Affiliations

Dana Loll is a doctoral candidate, and Paul J. Fleming and Elizabeth J. King are assistant professors —all with the University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Abubakar Manu is lecturer, Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra. Emmanuel Morhe is associate professor and head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana. Rob Stephenson is professor and chair, Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing. Kelli Stidham Hall is assistant professor, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Guttmacher Institute.

International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Support Our Work

Your support enables the Guttmacher Institute to advance sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and globally through our interrelated program of high-quality research, evidence-based advocacy and strategic communications.