Facts on Publicly Funded Contraceptive Services in the United States
WHO NEEDS CONTRACEPTIVE SERVICES?
• The typical American woman, who wants two children, spends about five years pregnant, postpartum or trying to become pregnant, and three decades—more than three-quarters of her reproductive life—trying to avoid pregnancy.
• About half of all pregnancies in the United States each year—more than three million—are unintended. By age 45, more than half of all American women will have experienced an unintended pregnancy, and three in 10 will have had an abortion.[3,4]
• There were 66 million U.S. women of reproductive age (13–44) in 2010.
• More than half of these women (37 million) were in need of contraceptive services and supplies; that is, they were sexually active and able to become pregnant, but were not pregnant and did not wish to become pregnant. The number of women in need of contraceptive services and supplies increased 10% between 2000 and 2010.
• Of the 37 million women in need in 2010, approximately 22 million were non-Hispanic white, 5.2 million were non-Hispanic black and seven million were Hispanic. (The remaining women were of other or mixed races and ethnicities.)
• Between 2000 and 2010, the number of women in need who were Hispanic increased by 46%, and the number who were black increased by 14%, while the number who were white decreased by 3%.
WHO NEEDS PUBLICLY FUNDED SERVICES?
• Of the 37 million women in need of contraceptive care in 2010, 19.1 million were in need of publicly funded services and supplies because they either had an income below 250% of the federal poverty level or were younger than 20.
• The number of women in need of publicly funded services increased by nearly three million (17%) between 2000 and 2010. All the growth in the need for publicly funded contraceptive services between 2000 and 2010 was among poor and low-income adults.
• Among the 19.1 million women in need of publicly funded contraceptive care, 75% (14.3 million) were poor or low-income adults, and 25% (five million) were younger than 20.
IS PUBLIC FUNDING AVAILABLE?
• Public expenditures for family planning services totaled $2.37 billion in FY 2010.
• Medicaid accounted for 75% of total expenditures, state appropriations for 12% and Title X for 10%. Other sources, such as the maternal and child health block grant, the social services block grant and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, together accounted for 3% of total funding.
• The joint federal-state Medicaid program spent $1.8 billion for family planning services in FY 2010. The program reimburses providers for contraceptive and related services delivered to enrolled individuals. The federal government pays 90% of the cost of these services, and the states pay the remaining 10%.
• Title X of the Public Health Service Act, the only federal program devoted specifically to supporting family planning services, contributed $228 million in FY 2010. It subsidizes services for women and men who do not meet the narrow eligibility requirements for Medicaid, maintains the national network of family planning centers and sets the standards for the provision of family planning services.
• Even among Title X–supported centers, Medicaid was the largest national source of financial support in 2010. Medicaid contributed 37% of all revenue reported by these centers, and Title X provided 22%. The remaining 41% came from state and local governments, other federal programs, private insurance and fees paid by clients.
• States spent $294 million of their own funds for family planning services in FY 2010 (in addition to the funding they contributed to Medicaid and block-grant programs through matching requirements).
• When inflation is taken into account, public funding for family planning client services increased 31% from FY 1980 to FY 2010.
A safety net health center that provides contraceptive services is a site that offers contraceptive services to the general public and uses public funds, including Medicaid, to provide free or reduced-fee services to at least some clients. These sites may be operated by a diverse range of provider agencies, including public health departments, Planned Parenthood affiliates, hospitals, community health centers and other, independent organizations. Some of these centers specialize in the provision of contraceptive services while others offer contraceptive care in the context of comprehensive primary care. In this fact sheet, “center” is used instead of the synonymous term “clinic.”
WHO RECEIVES PUBLICLY FUNDED SERVICES?
• In 2010, nine million women—47% of all women in need of publicly subsidized care—received publicly funded contraceptive services.
• Nearly seven million women, representing 35% of women in need of publicly subsidized care, received contraceptive services from the more than 8,000 safety net health centers providing family planning services in 2010.
• More than two million women were Medicaid enrollees who received contraceptive services from private physicians in 2010.
• Teenagers represented nearly one in four contraceptive clients served by safety net health centers in 2010; one and a half million women younger than 20 were served by these centers.
WHERE ARE PUBLICLY FUNDED SERVICES PROVIDED?
• In 2010, subsidized family planning services were provided at 8,400 safety net health centers—2,439 (29%) were health department clinics, 3,165 (38%) were federally qualified health centers, 1,324 (16%) were other clinics, 817 (10%) were Planned Parenthood centers and 664 (8%) were hospital clinics.
• More than one-third (36%) of women who obtained contraceptive care from safety net centers in 2010 received services from Planned Parenthood sites, 27% from health department clinics, 8% from hospital outpatient facilities and 16% from federally qualified health centers and 13% from other, independent clinics.
• In 2010, there were more than 4,100 Title X-supported centers. Seventy percent of all women served by publicly funded centers (4.7 million) were served by these Title X–supported centers.
MEDICAID FAMILY PLANNING EXPANSIONS
• Much of the growth in Medicaid spending on family planning is related to state-initiated expansions specifically for family planning.
• Twenty-six states have broadened Medicaid eligibility requirements to provide coverage for family planning under the program to individuals based solely on their income; most of these states set the income ceiling at or near 200% of the federal poverty level in order to match the ceiling they use for pregnancy-related care. An additional five states have adopted much more limited expansions.
• Sixty-seven percent of U.S. women of reproductive age live in one of the 26 states that have income-based Medicaid family planning eligibility expansions.
• Medicaid family planning expansions broaden private physician participation in the provider network; improve geographic availability of services; extend the interval between pregnancies; expand the number of family planning clients; help women avoid unplanned pregnancies, unplanned births and abortions; and reduce teen pregnancies, births and abortions—all while saving public dollars.
• Clinics in states with Medicaid expansions are more likely than clinics in other states to provide clients with a broad range of contraceptive options and to have extended service hours, and they are less likely to report difficulty stocking certain methods due to cost.
WHAT SERVICES DO PUBLICLY FUNDED CENTERS OFFER?
• More than half of centers (54%) reported offering clients at least 10 of 13 possible reversible contraceptive methods in 2010, an increase from 35% of centers in 2003.
• Oral contraceptives, injectables (e.g., Depo Provera) and condoms are provided by more than nine in 10 safety net health centers; 80% offer emergency contraceptive pills.
• More than half of centers (57%) report that they are unable to stock certain contraceptive methods due to cost.
• The availability of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods increased significantly between 2003 and 2010. IUD provision increased from 57% to 63%, and the implant, which was unavailable in 2003, was offered by 39% of centers in 2010.
• Centers with a reproductive health focus offer a greater range of contraceptive methods on site and are more likely to have protocols that help clients initiate and continue using methods, compared with those that focus on primary care.
• Similarly, centers that receive support through Title X provide a higher average number of contraceptive methods and are more likely to have protocols that enable easy initiation and continuation of methods, compared with those that do not receive Title X funding.
• In 2010, four in 10 centers (39%) offered same-day appointments to new contraceptive clients. Among all centers, the average wait for an appointment was just over five days. Additionally, 39% of centers offered extended hours in the evenings or on weekends.
• Virtually all safety net health centers provide pregnancy testing, and the vast majority offer STI testing (97%) and treatment (95%), HIV testing (92%) and HPV vaccinations (87%).
• Although most safety net health centers focus on serving women, most also offer services to men. Overall, 8% of clients served by safety net health centers in 2010 were male. Some 63% of clinics provide STI treatment to male partners when female clients test positive, and 57% provide STI services to men on their own. Additionally, half of all centers reported that men receive contraceptive services directly.
PUBLICLY FUNDED CENTERS’ ROLE AS SAFETY NET PROVIDERS
• More than six in 10 women who obtained care at a publicly funded center that provides contraceptive services in 2006–2010 considered the center their usual source of medical care. For four in 10 women obtaining care at family planning centers that specialize in the provision of contraceptive care, that center is their only source of health care. 
• One in four women who obtained a contraceptive service in 2006–2010 did so at a publicly funded center. Of these, 9% obtained their care from an independent family planning center, such as a Planned Parenthood clinic or other facility that focuses on providing contraceptive care; 8% did so at a community clinic, such as a community health center; 6% did so at a health department clinic; and 5% did so at a hospital outpatient or school-based clinic. 
• Fourteen percent of all women who obtained contraceptive services in 2006–2010, and 25% of all poor women who received a contraceptive service, did so at a site that received funding through the Title X program. Ten percent of women who received a Pap test or pelvic exam in that period did so at a Title X–funded site. 
• Eighteen percent of women who received testing, treatment or counseling for an STI in 2006–2010 did so at a Title X–funded site. Fourteen percent of women who were tested for HIV did so at a Title X–supported site. 
WHAT IMPACT DO FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES HAVE?
• Publicly funded family planning services help women to avoid pregnancies they do not want and to plan pregnancies they do. In 2010, these services helped women avoid 2.2 million unintended pregnancies, which would likely have resulted in about 1.1 million unintended births and 760,000 abortions.
• Contraceptive services provided at publicly funded centers helped prevent 1.7 million of these unintended pregnancies; the remaining 550,000 unintended pregnancies were prevented among Medicaid enrollees who received publicly funded contraceptive services from private physicians.
• Without publicly funded family planning services, the number of unintended pregnancies and abortions occurring in the United States would be 66% higher among women overall; the number of unintended pregnancies among poor women would be 70% higher, and among teens, 73% higher.
• Contraceptive services provided at Title X–supported centers helped prevent 1.2 million unintended pregnancies in 2010, which would likely have resulted in 590,000 unintended births and 400,000 abortions.
• The services provided at publicly funded centers saved the federal and state governments an estimated $7.6 billion in 2010; services provided at Title X–supported centers accounted for $5.3 billion of that total.
• In other words, nationally, every $1.00 invested in helping women avoid pregnancies they did not want to have saved $5.68 in Medicaid expenditures that otherwise would have been needed.
Sources of Data
The data in this fact sheet are the most current available as of July 2013.
1. Gold RB et al., Next Steps for America’s Family Planning Program: Leveraging the Potential of Medicaid and Title X in an Evolving Health Care System, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2009.
2. Finer LB and Zolna MR, Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006, Contraception, 2011, doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013.
3. Finer LB and Henshaw SK, Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2006, 38(2):90–96.
4. Jones RK and Kavanaugh ML, Changes in abortion rates between 2000 and 2008 and lifetime incidence of abortion, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, 117(6):1358–1366.
5. Guttmacher Institute, Contraceptive Needs and Services, 2010, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2013, <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/win/contraceptive-needs-2010.pdf>, accessed July 15, 2013.
6. Sonfield A and Gold RB, Public Funding for Family Planning, Sterilization and Abortion Services, FY 1980–2010, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2012.
7. Fowler CI et al., Family Planning Annual Report: 2010 National Summary, Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International, 2010.
8. Guttmacher Institute, State Medicaid family planning eligibility expansions, State Policies in Brief (as of May 2013), 2013, <http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_SMFPE.pdf>, accessed May 15, 2013.
9. Special tabulations of data from the National Center for Health Statistics and the U.S. Census Bureau.
10. Sonfield A and Gold RB, Medicaid Family Planning Expansions: Lessons Learned and Implications for the Future, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2011.
11. Frost JJ et al., Variation in Service Delivery Practices Among Clinics Providing Publicly Funded Family Planning Services in 2010, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2012, <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/clinic-survey-2010.pdf>, accessed May 23, 2012.
12. Frost JJ, U.S. Women’s Use of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: Trends, Sources of Care and Factors Associated with Use, 1995–2010, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2013.
13. Frost JJ, Gold RB and Bucek A, Specialized family planning clinics in the United States: Why women choose them and their role in meeting women’s health care needs, Women's Health Issues, 2012, 22(6):e519–e525.
Figure: Public Funding Sources
Sonfield A and Gold RB, Public Funding for Family Planning, Sterilization and Abortion Services, FY 1980–2010, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2012, <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/Public-Funding-FP-2010.pdf>, accessed May 17, 2012.
Figure: Importance of Publicly Supported Centers
Frost JJ, U.S. Women’s Use of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: Trends, Sources of Care and Factors Associated with Use, 1995–2010, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2013.
Map: Medicaid Family Planning Expansions
Guttmacher Institute, State Medicaid family planning eligibility expansions, State Policies in Brief, (as of May 2013), 2013, <http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_SMFPE.pdf>, accessed May 15, 2013.
Figure: Pregnancies Averted
Guttmacher Institute, Contraceptive Needs and Services, 2010, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2013, <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/win/contraceptive-needs-2010.pdf>, accessed July 15, 2013.