Volume 46, Issue 4
Pages 223 - 231

Provider Counseling to Young Women Seeking Family Planning Services


Contraceptive nonuse and misuse contribute to rates of unintended pregnancy and STDs among young women in the United States. Clinical providers assume an important role in guiding youths’ contraceptive method choices.


Sixty-seven women aged 16–21 were recruited as part of a cohort study, conducted in 2009–2012, that examined provider-patient interactions during family planning visits at six San Francisco clinics. Interactions between patients and providers were audio-recorded. Participants completed questionnaires about method preference immediately before seeing the provider; they reported on method choice immediately after the visit and by telephone three and six months later. Transcripts were analyzed to examine providers’ strategies for guiding decision making and addressing youths’ contraceptive concerns. Missed opportunities for promoting young women's reproductive health were identified.


Twenty-one percent of young women who did not report desiring a hormonal or long-acting reversible method (IUD or implant) before seeing their provider chose one after counseling. Use of a hormonal or long-acting reversible contraceptive method at follow-up was more common among women who had received interactive counseling by providers who guided them to consider contextual influences than among those who had not received such counseling. Attention to relationship characteristics, sexual behavior patterns and STD risk was largely absent from contraceptive counseling.


High-quality strategies used by providers to guide contraceptive decision making were tailored to adolescents’ developmental and environmental needs. Several areas of counseling require increased attention and seem vital to providing comprehensive reproductive health care to adolescents.

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2014, 46(4):xx-xx, doi: 10.1363/46e1414

Authors' Affiliations

Alexandra M. Minnis is senior research epidemiologist with the Women’s Global Health Imperative at RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, and assistant professor at the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. Sue Napierala Mavedzenge is epidemiologist, and Ellen Luecke is research associate, Women’s Global Health Imperative, RTI International. Christine Dehlendorf is associate professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Guttmacher Institute.

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Support Our Work

Your support enables the Guttmacher Institute to advance sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and globally through our interrelated program of high-quality research, evidence-based advocacy and strategic communications.