Volume 51, Issue 3
Pages 135 - 142

Women's Expectation of Receiving Reproductive Health Care at Catholic and Non‐Catholic Hospitals

CONTEXT

Catholic hospitals operate under directives that prohibit the provision of contraceptives, sterilization and abortion. Little research has examined women's awareness of these institutions’ policies, which affects their ability to make informed decisions about where to seek care.

METHODS

In 2016, some 1,430 women aged 18–45 were recruited from a U.S. probability‐based research panel for a survey about hospital care. Respondents were randomized to a hypothetical Catholic or nonreligious hospital group and asked about their expectations for receiving nine specific reproductive services. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between participants’ characteristics and their correctly identifying a hospital as Catholic, as well as between characteristics and expecting that birth control pills, tubal ligation or abortion for serious fetal indications would be provided there.

RESULTS

Women randomized to the Catholic hospital group were less likely than those randomized to the nonreligious group to expect provision of birth control pills (77% vs. 86%), tubal ligation (70% vs. 78%) or abortion for serious fetal indications (42% vs. 54%). Income level was associated with correctly identifying the Catholic hospital: Compared with individuals with the lowest income, those in three of the four other income groups were more likely to identify the hospital as Catholic (odds ratios, 1.9–2.2). In comparison with women who misidentified the Catholic hospital, those who identified it as Catholic had lower expectations that the hospital would provide birth control pills (0.3), tubal ligation (0.5) or abortion (0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Many women do not realize the breadth of restrictions on reproductive health care at Catholic hospitals. Without institutional transparency, patient autonomy and health outcomes may be compromised.

Authors' Affiliations

Debra B. Stulberg is assistant professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago. Maryam Guiahi is associate professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora. Luciana E. Hebert is assistant research professor, Initiative for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Seattle. Lori R. Freedman is associate professor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Guttmacher Institute.

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Support Our Work

Your support enables the Guttmacher Institute to advance sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and globally through our interrelated program of high-quality research, evidence-based advocacy and strategic communications.