Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Donate
 

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

A journal of peer-reviewed research

A Rights-Based Approach to Sexuality Education: Conceptualization, Clarification and Challenges

4606314.pdf

Authors

Nancy F. Berglas Norman A. Constantine Emily J. Ozer
CONTEXT

Although a rights-based approach to sexuality education has been increasingly discussed in the past decade, documented consensus regarding the goals, concepts and underlying assumptions of this approach is lacking. Differences in the assumed meaning of a rights-based approach can limit discussions of its implementation and evaluation, and impede opportunities to explore and critique a new model for sexuality education.

METHODS

In-depth interviews were conducted in 2012 with 21 U.S. and international sexuality education experts. Data were thematically coded and analyzed using an iterative approach. Responses were compared according to respondents’ professional discipline and geographic focus.

RESULTS

A rights-based approach can be defined as the intersection of four elements: an underlying principle that youth have sexual rights; an expansion of programmatic goals beyond reducing unintended pregnancy and STDs; a broadening of curricula content to include such issues as gender norms, sexual orientation, sexual expression and pleasure, violence, and individual rights and responsibilities in relationships; and a participatory teaching strategy that engages youth in critical thinking about their sexuality and sexual choices. These elements were consistently identified by respondents across professional disciplines and geographic foci. In addition, all respondents raised questions about the feasibility of implementing a rights-based approach, particularly in the United States.

CONCLUSIONS

While questions remain to be answered regarding the implementation and impact of rights-based sexuality education, the proposed conceptual definition suggests multiple avenues for advocates, researchers, program developers and funders to enhance adolescent sexual health.

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2014, 46(2):xx-xx, doi: 10.1363/46e1114

Author's Affiliations

Nancy Berglas is research scientist, Center for Research on Adolescent Health and Development, Public Health Institute, Oakland. Norman A. Constantine is senior scientist and director, Center for Research on Adolescent Health and Development, Public Health Institute, and clinical professor of community health and human development, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. Emily J. Ozer is associate professor of community health and human development, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the Guttmacher Institute.
Volume 46, Issue 2
June 2014
|
Pages 63 - 72

First published online: May 2, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1114
Source / Available for Purchase
Full featured article available to subscribers

Share

PSRH menu

  • About PSRH
  • Find PSRH articles
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.