Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
BMC Public Health

Abortion-related morbidity and mortality in Sierra Leone: results from a 2021 cross-sectional study

Authors

Stephanie Küng, Guttmacher Institute Francis Moses, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone Kenneth Juma , African Population Health and Research Center Esther Mutuku, African Population and Health Research Center Mohamed Koblo Kamara, Statistics Sierra Leone (StatsSL) Margaret Giorgio, Guttmacher Institute Boniface Ayanbekongshie Ushie, African Population and Health Research Center

Background

Unsafe abortion remains a significant driver of maternal morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the severity of abortion complications among post-abortion care (PAC) clients in Sierra Leone and factors associated with more severe complications.

Methods

We applied the Prospective Morbidity Survey (PMS) among PAC patients and their providers in 142 facilities in Sierra Leone between August and October 2021. We administered a total of 522 patient PMS surveys and 513 provider PMS surveys. To assess post-abortion complication severity, we utilized a five-level severity classification system ranging from mild to maternal death. We conducted bivariate and multivariable tests to assess factors associated with the severity of complications. Dependent variables included demographic characteristics and delays to care reported by PAC patients.

Results

Overall, 36% of PAC patients had mild complications, 30% moderate, 27% severe, and 8% near-miss. One person died. Many women experienced delays to care, particularly in realizing care was needed, deciding to seek care, and arriving at the health facility. Controlling for facility level, the risk of experiencing a severe or near-miss complication or death was not significantly associated with the patient’s sociodemographic characteristics, except age and number of pregnancies; compared to adolescents 19 and under, PAC patients aged 20–24 had significantly lower risk of a severe/near-miss complication or death, while PAC patients with 2–4 pregnancies had significantly higher risk of a severe/near-miss complication or death compared to PAC patients experiencing their first pregnancy. Delays in accessing care were significantly associated with having more severe complications; patients were more likely to suffer the most severe complications if they had to wait longer than one hour to be attended to, or did not receive complete treatment within 12 h.

Conclusions

Compared to regional and global estimates, the burden of abortion-related complications in Sierra Leone is high. The recent effort to liberalize abortion law is promising; this potential legal reform must be paired with the expansion of safe abortion services to reduce abortion-related morbidity and mortality in the country. In the absence of legal change, our analysis also emphasizes the need to ensure PAC services are always free of cost, that women are aware of the availability and legality of PAC, and that facilities have the human and material resources needed to handle these cases.

First published on BMC Public Health: March 24, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22192-7

Share

Topic

Global

  • Abortion

Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.