Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
BMC Public Health

Identifying women with poor experience of post-abortion care: a cross-sectional study in two African hospitals in humanitarian settings

Authors

Estelle Pasquier, Médecins Sans Frontières Pierre Debeaudrap, Centre for Population and Development Lenka Benova, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Richard Norbert Ngbale, Ministère de la santé et de la Population de la République Centrafricaine Mariette Claudia Adame Gbanzi, Ministère de la santé et de la Population de la République Centrafricaine Onikepe Owolabi, Guttmacher Institute Timothy Williams, Médecins Sans Frontières Veronique Filippi, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Olivier Degomme, Ghent University

Background

High quality post-abortion care (PAC) is essential to reducing abortion-related morbidity and mortality. However, the experience of receiving PAC, a key component of care quality, remains understudied in humanitarian settings. We assessed the experience of PAC in two hospitals supported by an international organization in Jigawa State (Nigeria) and Bangui (Central African Republic, CAR) and identified characteristics associated with poor experience of PAC.

Methods

We analyzed data from two components of a multi-methods cross-sectional study: a prospective medical records review and a survey of women hospitalized for abortion complications in the Nigerian (n = 360) and CAR (n = 362) hospitals. We measured women’s experience of PAC with two questions related to communication with health providers (explanations received and ability to ask questions) and five questions related to respect and preservation of dignity (privacy, waiting times, health provider’s kindness, painkillers provision and overall care assessment). Association between women’s characteristics and the two communication outcomes were investigated using multivariate logistic regressions. A latent variable was constructed using the five respect and dignity questions and its association with women’s characteristics was assessed using multivariate linear regression.

Results

Nearly 51% in Nigeria hospital and 41% in CAR hospital reported receiving no explanation of their care, and over 80% in both hospitals said they felt unable to ask questions during examination and treatment. Less than 20% of women in Nigeria reported a lack of respect and preservation of their dignity. In CAR, almost 63% of women said that their privacy was not always respected during the physical examination and 38% said waiting times were long or very long before seeing a health provider. We found associations between low education level and poor experience of communication in both settings. Being adolescent was associated with one poor communication outcome in CAR and poor experience of respect and preservation of dignity in Nigeria.

Conclusion

A non-negligible proportion of PAC patients faced poor communication and mixed experiences of respect, with poorer experiences in women with low education and adolescents. Socio-demographic inequalities in PAC experiences must not be overlooked in humanitarian settings, and further research is critical to identify and support the most vulnerable women.

First published on BMC Public Health: December 6, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25558-z

Share

Topic

Global

  • Abortion

Geography

  • Global
  • Africa: Central African Republic, Nigeria
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.