Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Contraception

Measurement of medication abortion-related bleeding: A systematic scoping review

Guttmacher logo

Authors

Alice F. Cartwright, Guttmacher Institute Rubina Hussain, Guttmacher Institute Clyde Schwab, Guttmacher Institute Leslie Root, University of Colorado Population Center

Objectives

Bleeding is a key expected result of medication abortion (MA); however, people’s expectations and experiences of bleeding can affect their abortion experiences. Our objective was to document the measurement approaches of MA-related bleeding in the literature to date from a patient perspective.

Study design

We conducted a systematic scoping review of English language, peer-reviewed studies identified through PubMed from January 2000 to March 2025. The authors screened abstracts and full text in Covidence based on pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies from any geographic region. All authors extracted data on time to onset, duration, volume, expectations, and acceptability of bleeding.

Results

The majority of the 111 included studies measured bleeding duration (89), followed by volume (65), time to onset (35), expectations (32), and acceptability (22). Studies used a variety of data collection approaches, including patient diaries/symptom logs, questionnaires, and in-depth interviews. Measurement of volume was most often in comparison to a menstrual period, and a variety of scales were also used. No studies mentioned using measurements that had been developed through a participatory process involving patients.

Conclusions

Volume and duration were the most commonly measured aspects of MA-related bleeding identified across studies, though they were rarely linked to patient expectations or acceptability of their abortion. This review provides clinicians, researchers, and advocates an overview of the measurement approaches to date regarding MA-related bleeding and the gaps for future measurement development.

Implications

To provide comprehensive, clear and appropriate information on MA care, more and better ways of measuring and understanding people’s MA bleeding experiences are still needed. Learnings from other fields, including menstrual health, can guide the development of future patient-reported outcome measures that reflect a broader range of patient experiences with MA-related bleeding.

First published on Contraception: March 7, 2026

Source / Available for Purchase
Read the full article.

Share

Topic

United States

  • Abortion

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

medication abortion
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.