Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Financials
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Impact Report 2025

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Join our community

  • Ways to Give
  • Sign up for our newsletter
  • Contact
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Financials
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Impact Report 2025

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Join our community

  • Ways to Give
  • Sign up for our newsletter
  • Contact
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Contraception

Society of Family Planning Research Practice Support: Key considerations for contraceptive misinformation research

Authors

Zoe H. Pleasure Elizabeth Pleasants, Center for Women’s Health Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Jessica Danaux, Coalition to Expand Contraceptive Access Asha Hassan, Division of Complex Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health, University of Minnesota Medical School David Scales, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine Anu Manchikanti Gómez, University of California, Berkeley Megan L. Kavanaugh, Guttmacher Institute

Abstract


Access to information has been identified as a social determinant of health, influencing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors that can shape health outcomes. Contraceptive information influences how individuals make decisions about accessing contraceptive care and method use, as well as broader reproductive health trajectories. The recent proliferation of contraceptive misinformation has led to increased research and media attention on this topic. Misinformation from all types of information sources must be understood and addressed by the sexual and reproductive health, rights, and justice field to enable people to make informed, autonomous decisions about contraception based on high-quality, high-integrity evidence. This Research Practice Support aims to guide researchers interested in studying contraceptive misinformation. First, we define key terms related to the information environment and ecosystem, including misinformation, disinformation, and other related concepts. Then, we provide actionable recommendations for each stage of the research process for studies focused on contraceptive misinformation, including study design and ethical considerations, data sources and collection, and dissemination. Scholars are encouraged to consider these recommendations to maximize the impact of their research focused on contraceptive misinformation.

First published on Contraception: July 29, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2026.111570
Source / Available for Purchase
Read the full article here.

Share

Topic

United States

  • Contraception

Geography

  • Northern America: United States
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.