Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
BMC Health Services Research

Cost savings of task-sharing in family planning: estimates across 128 low- and middle-income countries

Authors

Adebiyi Adesina, Guttmacher Institute Meltem Odabaș, Guttmacher Institute Heidi Quinn, UNFPA Moazzam Ali, World Health Organization Elizabeth A. Sully, Guttmacher Institute

Background

Task-sharing, the expansion of health service provision to a broader range of health workers, where the number of providers is expanded through training and support of additional cadres, offers a strategy to alleviate some of the human resource and financial challenges that limit low- and middle-income countries’ (LMICs) ability to deliver essential health services, including family planning (FP). In this study, we apply the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recommendations to estimate the potential cost-savings from task-sharing FP services.

Methods

We use the Adding It Up (AIU) 2024 model estimates on contraceptive services for 128 LMICs to estimate the direct costs of providing contraceptive care for six methods – condoms (male and female), oral contraceptive pills, emergency contraceptive pills (ECP), injectables, implants and intrauterine devices. We compare the costs of two scenarios – a status quo (under current provider guidelines for FP service delivery) and a task-sharing scenario (implementing WHO task-sharing guidelines for FP service delivery).

Results

Implementing WHO task-sharing recommendations within the next year would save an estimated $1.6 billion USD across all LMICs. Task-sharing reduces the direct cost of service delivery for all six methods, saving 34% for male condoms, 31% for injectables, 30% for pills and IUDs, 22% for ECPs, 12% for implants and 9% for female condoms. These cost savings were largely consistent at the global, regional, and sub-regional levels.

Conclusions

WHO recommendations for task-sharing service delivery offer a critical cost-saving policy mechanism that leverages limited human and financial resources to better meet contraceptive needs while at the same time reducing health system costs. Cost estimates generated from the AIU model show that implementing WHO recommendations for task-sharing family planning services is a promising strategy for expanding access to contraceptive care across LMICs. Amidst increasing cuts to family planning financing, strategies for delivering quality services at lower costs are critical to ensuring continued access to care.

First published on BMC Health Services Research: June 13, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14839-x
Source / Available for Purchase
Read the full article here.

Share

Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.