Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Financials
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Impact Report 2026

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Join our community

  • Ways to Give
  • Sign up for our newsletter
  • Contact
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Financials
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Impact Report 2026

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Join our community

  • Ways to Give
  • Sign up for our newsletter
  • Contact
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Video
November 12, 2026

Planned Parenthood is critical to birth control access in the United States

Research from Guttmacher and Power to Decide shows that 21.4 million women in need of free or low-cost birth control live in US counties where local clinics can't meet this need. Planned Parenthood helps these women and many others access affordable sexual and reproductive health care, but this critical provider is under relentless attack by anti-abortion politicians.

If Planned Parenthood clinics no longer received federal funding and were forced to stop providing affordable care, the impact would be staggering: 12.4 million women in need of publicly funded contraceptive care could be affected. That is 58% of the total number of US women who are likely to need this care.

Policymakers and advocates must defend Planned Parenthood and all providers of quality and affordable contraceptive care.

Video

Transcript: What happens to birth control access if Planned Parenthood loses federal funding? 

21.4 million women in need of free or low-cost birth control in the US live in areas where local clinics cannot meet the need for affordable contraceptive care according to research from Guttmacher and Power to Decide. We refer to these as contraceptive access gaps. 

Planned Parenthood helps these women and many others access affordable sexual and reproductive health care, but this critical provider is under relentless attack by anti-abortion politicians. Guttmacher researchers wanted to understand what would happen if Planned Parenthood clinics could no longer receive federal dollars and were forced to stop providing affordable contraceptive care. 

We crunched the numbers and in short, things would get a whole lot worse, so let’s talk.

If Planned Parenthood health centers were removed from the publicly funded contraceptive care network, an estimated 12.4 million women would live in counties that would have reduced access to contraceptive care. 

Let’s understand what that means regionally: 

In 29 counties across the Northeast and Midwest, Planned Parenthood is the only publicly funded contraceptive provider. In these counties, about 240,000 women would lose their only source of affordable contraceptive care. 

The largest number of women affected by a potential Planned Parenthood removal from this care system live in the West and South, with over 4 million women in the West and 3.7 million women in the South living in counties with reduced access. 

To learn more about the limitations of contraceptive access and the potential effects of defunding Planned Parenthood, visit the links in our bio.

Share

Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.