March 2020 Policy Analysis By Funding Texas’ Harmful Antiabortion Crusade, the Trump Administration Is Setting a Dangerous Precedent Adam Sonfield United StatesContraception
March 2019 Policy Analysis Guttmacher Institute Declaration Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington: National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association, et al. v. Alex M. Azar II, et. al United StatesAbortionContraception
February 2019 Policy Analysis Dangerous and Coercive Title X Gag Rule Released Kinsey Hasstedt United StatesContraception
July 2018 Policy Analysis Proposed Changes to the Title X National Family Planning Program: Guttmacher Institute Comments to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services United StatesContraceptionTeens
December 2018 Infographic In 2018, state policies enacted to support reproductive health far outweighed the number of restrictions United StatesAbortionContraception
December 2018 Policy Analysis State Policy Trends 2018: With Roe v. Wade in Jeopardy, States Continued to Add New Abortion Restrictions Elizabeth Nash,Rachel Benson Gold,Zohra Ansari-Thomas,Olivia Cappello,Sophia NaideandLizamarie Mohammed United StatesAbortionContraception
June 2018 News Release Most Contraceptive Patients at Title X–Funded Health Centers in 2016 Had Insurance Coverage and Planned to Use It to Pay for Services United StatesContraception
March 2018 Blog / Letter / Op-ed Four Big Threats To The Title X Family Planning Program: Examining The Administration’s New Funding Opportunity Announcement Kinsey Hasstedt,Health Affairs Blog United StatesContraception
February 2018 Policy Analysis Coercion Is at the Heart of Social Conservatives’ Reproductive Health Agenda Joerg Dreweke,Guttmacher Policy Review United StatesAbortionContraceptionPregnancyTeens
