Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Video
August 10, 2026

State policy attacks on abortion access in the first half of 2026

Anti-abortion state policymakers in the US are focused on cutting off remaining access to care and criminalizing pregnant people. Guttmacher principal state policy advisor Kimya Forouzan examines the major restrictions and key trends from state legislative sessions during the first six months of this year.
Video

Transcript: 

Halfway through 2026, here's where sexual and reproductive health policy stands in the States. In 2026, many anti-abortion state policymakers are focused on two things, cutting off the access that remains and criminalizing pregnant people. We analyzed legislative sessions nationwide, and three major themes stood out. 

First, some policymakers want to make getting an abortion a crime. In Tennessee, one bill would have let the state charge people who access abortion care with homicide. 

Others pushed fetal personhood bills, which would grant full legal rights to embryos and fetuses. 

These bills set the stage to criminalize people for a whole range of common pregnancy outcomes, including pregnancy loss. 

Second, some policymakers are trying to use legislation to falsely differentiate abortion care from pregnancy loss care, even though both types of care are essential, and they usually involve the same medications and procedures. 

In South Dakota, where a total abortion ban is already in effect, policymakers rewrote the legal definition of abortion to exclude pregnancy loss care. But clarifying the difference doesn't change the fact that bans on abortion care also jeopardize care for those experiencing pregnancy loss. 

Third, attacks on telehealth and shield law providers are escalating. 

In states with total bans, getting medication abortion pills through the mail has been a lifeline, and shield laws give providers a legal way to offer that care. That's made those providers a top target for anti-abortion policymakers and legal groups. A new law in Mississippi treats abortion pills as illicit drugs under its controlled substances code, laying the groundwork to go after the shield law providers people rely on. 

In addition to these trends, we are keeping an eye on other trends and protective policies, so check back for part two, where we'll cover those protective policies.

Share

Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.