Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Studies in Family Planning

[Un]met need and [un]wanted family planning: A cross-sectional study among women in Argentina, Ghana, and India examining characteristics, reasons, and alignment with fertility desires

Authors

Jewel Gausman, Guttmacher Institute Niranjan Saggurti, Population Council Richard Adanu, University of Ghana School of Public Health Delia A. B. Bandoh, University of Ghana School of Public Health Mabel Berrueta, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina Suchandrima Chakraborty, Population Council Ernest Kenu, University of Ghana School of Public Health Nizamuddin Khan Ana Langer, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Nigri Carolina, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina Magdalene A. Odikro, University of Ghana School of Public Health Veronica Pingray, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina Sowmya Ramesh, Population Council Paula Vázquez, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina Caitlin R. Williams, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina R. Rima Jolivet, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

Unwanted family planning often refers to fertility desires as a proxy for contraceptive desire and lacks alignment with the tenets of person-centered care. We construct a person-centered measure of unwanted family planning by asking women whether they wanted to use a method, examine its alignment with the fertility-derived measure, and describe the characteristics of women with unwanted family planning and reasons women state for not wanting to use a method. We conducted a cross-sectional study of women aged 15–49 in Argentina, Ghana, and India. Data were collected on stated desire to use contraception and basic sociodemographic characteristics. Fertility desire was collected using the standard Demographic and Health Survey questionnaire. In total, 4794 women were included in our study. Among women using a method, 2.5 percent (n = 53) of women had unwanted family planning, with 4.2 percent in Ghana, 2.2 percent in Argentina, and 2.0 percent in India. Most unwanted family planning (85.2 percent, n = 23) occurred among women who did not want a child within the next nine months. Sexual infrequency was the most common reason behind a lack of desire to use a method. Our results highlight the substantial differences found between classifying women's contraceptive needs from a person-centered versus a fertility-derived approach.

Read the full article at Studies in Family Planning. 

First published on Studies in Family Planning: September 16, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70035

Share

Topic

Global

  • Contraception

Geography

  • Global
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.