Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
PLOS Global Public Health

“As it is about that, they do as they please”: Women’s experience of the accessibility and acceptability of postabortion care in Kaya, Burkina Faso

Authors

Rachidatou Compaoré, Saint Thomas d’Aquin University (USTA) Clémentine Rossier, University of Geneva Onikepe Owolabi, Guttmacher Institute Adama Baguiya, Saint Thomas d’Aquin University (USTA) Caron Kim, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO Moussa Zan, University of Joseph Ki-Zerbo Nazi Vincent Bagnoa, Saint Thomas d’Aquin University (USTA) Martin Bangha, African Population Health and Research Center Seni Kouanda, Saint Thomas d’Aquin University (USTA)

Abstract

Accessing acceptable postabortion care (PAfor remains a major challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, where abortion is legally restricted and highly stigmatized, particularly for young and socioeconomically disadvantaged women. Evidence on the specific obstacles faced by these groups in rural and semi-urban settings is limited. This study explored women’s experiences with PAC quality in Kaya, a small town in Burkina Faso. We conducted in-depth interviews with women (n = 35) who had participated in a respondent-driven sampling survey on abortion safety in 2021 and had sought PAC for abortion-related complications in formal health facilities. Additional interviews were carried out with representatives of local grassroots associations involved in sexual and reproductive health in the town (n = 8). Thematic analysis was used to examine perceptions of abortion stigma within the community, followed by a typology analysis to identify inequalities in the accessibility (timely, geographically reasonable, and affordable provision of care) and acceptability (patient-centeredness, including cleanliness, privacy, respect and non-judgemental care) of PAC across different categories of women. Both women and association representatives strongly condemned abortion, and the legal exceptions were largely unknown. Abortion stigma was much stronger for young and unmarried women who often sought abortions due to partners denying responsibility and fear of social exclusion. Married women faced less stigma when abortions were linked to closely spaced pregnancies or economic hardship. Fear of prosecution and mistreatment delayed care-seeking, especially among unmarried adolescents and young women. They also reported more verbal abuse, longer waiting times, and a lack of privacy during care, reflecting and reinforcing the heightened stigma they faced. Women with greater socioeconomic resources more often used private facilities, where both accessibility and acceptability were perceived as better, particularly for unmarried women. This study highlights substantial inequalities in the accessibility and acceptability of PAC in Kaya, shaped by women’s marital status, age, and socioeconomic position.

First published on PLOS Global Public Health: January 8, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005035

Share

Topic

Global

  • Abortion

Geography

  • Global
  • Africa: Burkina Faso
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.