Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Women's Health Issues

Where U.S. Women Obtained Contraceptive and Related Care and How They Paid for It in 2022–2023: An Analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth

Guttmacher logo

Authors

Hannah Olson, Guttmacher Institute Mia R. Zolna, Guttmacher Institute

Objective

We aimed to examine receipt of contraceptive and other sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services among U.S. women of reproductive age in 2022–2023, sources of care, and payment methods, with attention to implications for the SRH safety net.
 

Materials and Methods

Using female respondent data from the 2022–2023 National Survey of Family Growth, we examined receipt of and source of care for 14 SRH services, including contraceptive, preventive gynecologic, sexually transmitted infection testing, and pregnancy-related services. We examined payment methods for contraceptive services by source of care, classified by provider type and funding status, and demographic characteristics.
 

Results

In the prior year, most U.S. women aged 15–49 (64%) received at least one SRH service and more than one-third received contraceptive services. While most obtained SRH care from private providers, publicly supported clinics served a notable share of adolescent, low-income, publicly insured, and uninsured women (30–36%). Overall, private insurance was the most common way individuals paid for contraceptive services (65%), but this varied by income, type of insurance coverage, and source of care. More than 40% of women who received contraceptive services at publicly supported clinics reported paying with Medicaid, compared with 18% at private providers. Out-of-pocket payments were most common among uninsured women (60%) and least common among those with Medicaid (13%). Uninsured women reported receiving no-cost services more often than those with insurance.
 

Implications for Policy and Practice

Publicly supported clinics are essential sources of SRH care, particularly for under-resourced populations. Recent policy changes threaten this safety net. Protecting publicly funded SRH services and maintaining robust provider networks is critical to ensuring equitable access to essential care.

First published on Women's Health Issues: April 16, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2026.02.007
Source / Available for Purchase
Read the full article

Share

Topic

United States

  • Contraception: Publicly Funded Family Planning

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

birth control
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.