Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Fact Sheet
July 2025

Adolescents’ and Young People’s Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Mozambique

Young people in Mozambique face a range of challenges in accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. These barriers can be particularly pronounced for marginalized and vulnerable youth, including young unmarried women, lesbian and bisexual women, and internally displaced persons (IDPs), and are often shaped by stigma and misinformation. 

As part of the broader Stand Up for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights project, the Guttmacher Institute and Mozambican partner Centro de Pesquisa em População e Saúde (CEPSA, or the Center for Population and Health Research) embarked on a collaborative research effort to better understand these challenges from the perspectives of young people themselves. They conducted a study in 2023 that explored how social norms influence access to information and services for adolescent and young women and men in northern Mozambique. Researchers recruited young people aged 15–24 from three districts—Nampula City, Nacala Porto and Mecubúri—and included both IDPs and non-IDPs, and those either in or out of school, for focus group discussions. Focus group participants were asked about their peers, an effective method for capturing social norms within similar demographic groups. The study team interviewed lesbian and bisexual young women individually. This fact sheet summarizes key findings from the study report and offers recommendations for advocates and health care providers.

Context

Mozambique has low modern contraceptive prevalence among 15–19-year-old women, high unmet need for a method of family planning, a high adolescent birth rate and a high all-women maternal mortality ratio. Despite the law allowing abortion on request during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and later in all other cases, pregnant adolescents are at risk of unsafe abortion because of stigma, misinformation and other barriers to accessing safe abortion services. The country has one of the world’s highest rates of child marriage: 14% of girls enter into a union before age 15 and 46% before 18. Early marriage linked to intimate partner violence and limited knowledge of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) threaten adolescents’ rights and their ability to access SRH services.

Adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health and rights are also threatened by discrimination and other forms of violence. Although Mozambique removed language criminalizing homosexuality from its penal code in 2014, the country lacks specific protections and effective accountability mechanisms for discrimination against LGBTQI+ populations. Since 2017, northern Mozambique, particularly the province of Cabo Delgado, has been the site of internal armed conflict between government forces and insurgents that has resulted in more than 800,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs). 

The research team selected three districts in Nampula Province, which borders Cabo Delgado, as the study setting because of their high-risk demographic profiles.

Contraceptive use 

Participants reported that young people have many misconceptions and negative perceptions about using condoms and other forms of contraception. Those include beliefs that: 

  • Contraceptive use encourages promiscuity and could cause infertility.

They will say that one is planning to be a prostitute, doesn’t want to have children now, is using contraception to be able to continue having sex when she wants to. (young man, focus group with non-IDPs aged 18–21, Mecubúri)

  • Condoms can get stuck inside women’s bodies and cause infections or illness.

[A friend can tell you:] You must never use condoms. If you do, you’ll infect yourself with HIV. Sometimes they say that condoms come with disease, come already with a disease, that’s the advice of…that’s what my friends tell me. (young man, focus group with IDPs aged 18–21, Nampula City)

  • Adolescents and young women are mainly concerned with preventing pregnancy and, if already using another contraceptive method, do not consider using condoms to protect against STIs.

Recommendations

  • Targeted campaigns via social media and community outreach and peer-to-peer education, designed to address misinformation and the benefits of condoms and other contraceptives, are paramount in helping young people avoid unwanted pregnancy and STIs.
  • Young people can be trained as peer educators who can speak to those in their age-group about the facts and advantages of using condoms and other contraceptives.
  • Health care providers can benefit from more comprehensive and regular training on how to discuss contraception with young people.

STIs

Stigma and shame significantly hinder young people from seeking and receiving treatment for STIs, especially for HIV and AIDS. Besides discomfort with examinations and fear of being recognized at health care facilities, participants described barriers to getting care that include:

  • Denying an STI diagnosis or thinking health professionals are being untruthful about a diagnosis, particularly regarding HIV, which continues to be highly stigmatized
  • Refusing treatment, including HIV medication

I’d like to give an example of a friend of mine. He also had gonorrhea and he didn’t tell anyone, nor did he go to the hospital. But only after two weeks with gonorrhea did people close to him discover it.…He wasn’t even able to walk, and it was then that people discovered that he had gonorrhea and then they took him for treatment.…But that may be really shame [that prevented him from getting treatment sooner] as my friend was saying. (young man, focus group with IDPs aged 18–21, Nampula City)

  • Health care providers who demand that patients bring sexual partners for testing and treatment

Shame and stigma also make many young people reluctant to discuss their STI status, particularly HIV, with partners. Focus group participants reported that young people do not always ask their partners about their STI status, because they fear rejection by the partner; when asked, not everyone is truthful about their STI status, and they rarely reveal if they do have one.

Recommendations

  • To encourage young people to seek treatment, health care providers should enhance the confidentiality of STI testing and services at facilities.
  • Sensitization efforts aimed at reducing the stigma associated with STIs, including HIV and AIDS, could include radio and visual media campaigns, community-based peer education and the integration of STI-awareness and destigmatization messages into existing health programs.
  • Mobile health services and telehealth platforms, such as a free hotline or an app delivering targeted messages about STI prevention, testing locations, appointment reminders and information on confidential counseling services, may increase young people’s willingness to obtain STI care.

Barriers to accessing SRH care

The majority of lesbian and bisexual young women interviewed believe that health care facilities are not prepared to address the sexual and reproductive health and rights of people with diverse sexual orientations. They reported experiencing significant discrimination and hostility in health care settings, which contributes to a lack of adequate health care provision for LGBTQI+ individuals. This discrimination manifests through:

  • Health care workers sometimes pressuring their colleagues to treat lesbian patients poorly
  • Refusal of treatment
  • Ignoring patients or delaying care
  • Making derogatory comments and jokes 

There are people who do go [to a health facility], and even if they meet a nurse who they think would treat them well...that nurse is influenced by others [to not treat all patients well] who say, “Haa...you can’t treat her, she’s a lesbian, she’s worthless.” (lesbian, aged 22, Nampula City)

Focus group participants reported that adolescent and young women faced significant barriers and discrimination in accessing prenatal care if they are unaccompanied by a partner. These individuals experienced poor treatment from health care providers, including:

  • Charges for childbirth services that should be free
  • Long delays to receive care
  • Visible disdain from providers, even when seriously ill 

There are some who don’t go to the hospital because they [the hospital staff] usually want a couple, a woman and a man, to sign up for prenatal care,…but if you’re pregnant and no longer seeing the man who got you pregnant, or he doesn’t take responsibility for the pregnancy.…There’s no way to go to the hospital alone, because they will refuse to give you care,…they turn you away and they tell you, “Bring the man who got you pregnant.”…You go and bring your brother [pretending to be your husband] to the hospital.…There are some [who] sit at home until the child grows up because they have no medical card. (young woman, focus group with non-IDPs aged 20–24, out of school, Nacala Porto)

Recommendations

  • Advocates should encourage the implementation of nondiscriminatory health care policies, including addressing women’s right to seek care alone.
  • Increased advocacy for and sensitization to the SRH needs of LGBTQI+ individuals can combat discrimination against those with diverse sexual orientations.
  • Youth-friendly corners or clinics within existing health care facilities where adolescents and young women can receive care in a supportive and understanding environment could improve the quality of care provided to this vulnerable population.

Abortion

Adolescent and young women seek induced abortion because of partner abandonment, shame, educational aspirations or uncertainty about paternity. Their abortion decisions can sometimes be influenced by the fear of having to disclose the pregnancy to parents. In cases where the partner has not abandoned the young woman, the decision to abort is highly influenced by the man. 

It’s not possible for a woman to abort without her partner’s consent. First, she talks with her boyfriend who got her pregnant, and often the person who decides whether you can abort or not is the man. (adolescent woman, focus group with non-IDPs aged 15–19 years, out of school, Nacala Porto)

Despite respondents mentioning that health facilities provide abortion services for free, they reported that only some adolescents and young women they knew obtained abortion services from health facilities. Very few respondents knew about medication abortion. Instead, they indicated that young women primarily use traditional methods to induce abortion with combinations of:

  • Coca-Cola
  • Powdered detergent
  • Strike-anywhere phosphorous matchsticks
  • Plant roots and leaves, including aloe vera and moringa

Recommendations

  • Establishing confidential, youth-friendly pregnancy counseling services can offer young people a nonjudgmental place to learn about their options for managing an unintended pregnancy, including how to discuss it with their parents.
  • Counseling about the dangers of unsafe abortion methods and enhancing outreach and dissemination of information about safe and free abortion options at health facilities may increase abortion safety for young people. 

Source

The information in this fact sheet can be found in Arnaldo C et al., Understanding the Barriers to and Facilitators of Access and Use of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services Among Adolescents and Young People in Nampula Province, Mozambique, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2025, https://www.guttmacher.org/report/young-peoples-barriers-sexual-reproductive-health-mozambique.

Acknowledgments

Ana Dilaverakis Fernandez and Ann M. Moore and edited by Jenny Sherman (Guttmacher Institute), and is part of the Stand Up for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights program, led by Oxfam Canada. The project on which this fact sheet is based was undertaken with financial support from the Government of Canada, provided through Global Affairs Canada, and from Norway through a grant from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Guttmacher Institute and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of the funders. 

 

View in:

English , Portuguese

Share

Download Fact Sheet

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Read More

Fact Sheet

Adding It Up: Costs and Benefits of Meeting the Contraceptive Needs of Adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa

Fact Sheet

Young People’s Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Uganda

Report

Young People's Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Uganda: Understanding Barriers and Facilitators

Topic

Global

  • Teens

Geography

  • Global
  • Africa: Mozambique
Partner
CEPSA (Centro de pesquisa em populacao e saude) logo
CEPSA
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.