Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Search results

The Global Gag Rule restricts foreign NGOs that accept U.S. funding from using their own money for abortion-related activities and the Helms Amendment restricts U.S.-funded organizations from using U.S. foreign assistance funding for abortion-related services
mars 9, 2021 Infographic

What's the difference between the Global Gag Rule and the Helms Amendment?

Repealing the Helms Amendment would enable use of U.S. foreign assistance for safe abortion services. In 33 countries receiving U.S. support for family planning, this could result in 19 million fewer unsafe abortions per year, 17,000 fewer maternal deaths per year, 12 million fewer women per year with abortion complications requiring medical treatment and net health system savings of $641 million annually
mars 9, 2021 Infographic

Impact of repealing the Helms Amendment

mars 8, 2021 Policy Analysis

What Federal Policymakers Must Do to Restore and Strengthen a Title X Family Planning Program That Serves All

Guttmacher Policy Review
mars 2, 2021 Policy Analysis

The Danger Ahead: Early Indicators Show States Will Be the Main Abortion Battleground in 2021

mars 1, 2021 Policy Analysis

Florida’s Proposed 20-Week Abortion Ban Would Force Pregnant People to Travel More Than 30 Times as Far for Care

février 23, 2021 Research Article

Use of concurrent multiple methods of contraception in the United States, 2008 to 2015

Megan L. Kavanaugh, Emma Pliskin and Jenna Jerman
Contraception: X
Evidence You Can Use

Medicaid Coverage of Abortion

février 8, 2021 Policy Analysis

Adolescents Deserve Better: What the Biden-Harris Administration and Congress Can Do to Bolster Young People’s Sexual and Reproductive Health

Guttmacher Policy Review
février 2, 2021 Policy Analysis

A Fragmented System: Ensuring Comprehensive Contraceptive Coverage in All U.S. Health Insurance Plans

Guttmacher Policy Review
janvier 27, 2021 Opinion

The Coming COVID Baby Bust

Ms. Magazine

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Current page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last

filter results

  • Global (30)
  • (-) United States (809)

Date Published

Type

  • Fact Sheet (24)
  • Infographic (114)
  • Initiative (2)
  • News Release (134)
  • Opinion (69)
  • Policy Analysis (197)
  • Report (44)
  • Research Article (182)
  • State Laws and Policies (19)
  • Video (7)

Region

  • Africa
    • Burkina Faso
  • Asia
  • Global
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
    • Mexico
  • Northern America
    • (-) United States

Language

  • Anglais (804)
  • Español (4)
  • Français (1)
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.