Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
News Release
September 22, 2005

Increased Contraceptive Choice Contributes to Greater Contraceptive Use According to 64-Country Study

Countries in which all couples have easy access to a variety of contraceptive methods have the highest overall rates of contraceptive use, according to findings reported in "Contraceptive Method Choice in Developing Countries." The analysis, by John Ross, Karen Hardee, Elizabeth Mumford and Sherrine Eid of The Futures Group International, found that people are more likely to use any contraceptive if they have access to a range of methods.

Many countries offer only a limited choice of contraceptive methods, and couples cannot easily choose the method that best suits their reproductive needs. As a result, overall contraceptive use is lower. By contrast, in countries offering all couples easy access to several methods, use of each available method increases, and overall contraceptive use is higher than in countries with fewer options.

For this study, the authors compared data from national surveys on patterns of contraceptive use with levels of access to four methods of contraception'female sterilization, the IUD, the pill and the condom. They found that contraceptive prevalence is highest in countries where access to all four methods of contraception is uniformly high..

Although access to a full choice of contraceptive methods is yet to be attained in many countries, greater programmatic attention to the provision of a full range of methods could increase both access to and use of contraception.

The March issue of International Family Planning Perspectives also includes:

• "Recent Changes in Heterosexual Attitudes, Norms and Behaviors Among Unmarried Thai Men: A Qualitative Analysis," by Mark VanLandingham and Lea Trujillo;

• "Spousal Communication and Family Planning Adoption: Effects of a Radio Drama Serial in Nepal," by Mona Sharan and Thomas W. Valente;

• "Reasons for the Low Level of IUD Use in El Salvador," by Karen R. Katz, Laura M. Johnson, Barbara Janowitz and José Miguel Carranza; and

• "Population and Poverty: New Views on an Old Controversy," by Thomas W. Merrick.

Printer-friendly version

Share

Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.