Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
News Release
December 1, 2005

Mothers with Many Children Most at Risk of Sexual and Physical Violence in Tanzania

A recent analysis of data from nearly 1,500 in-person interviews with women in the urban district of Moshi, Tanzania, highlights the need for policies and programs aimed at empowering women to take control of their sex lives and fertility. One in five women interviewed said she had been physically or sexually abused—physically threatened, hit, slapped, kicked or otherwise physically hurt or forced to have sex against her will— by her partner in the past year. One in four reported having been abused in her lifetime.

In East Africa, where large families are common, women often bear the blame if a couple cannot conceive. Women who cannot bear children have twice the odds of being beaten or sexually abused by their partners as do mothers.

Surprisingly, women with larger than average families (five or more children) may be at even greater risk, with two-and-a-half times the odds of being beaten or sexually abused. As family size decreases all over Africa in response to changing cultural norms, the stigma of having an unusually large family and the financial strain of raising many children may contribute to this phenomenon.

In other words, women are blamed for having too many children, or too few, and in a culture where violence against women is broadly accepted this blame may lead to abuse. Policies and programs should discourage men from blaming women for infertility, conclude authors Laura Ann McCloskey of the University of Pennsylvania, Corrine Williams of Harvard University and Ulla Larson of the University of Maryland in "Gender Inequality and Intimate Partner Violence Among Women in Moshi, Tanzania."

The study appears in Volume 31, Number 3 of International Family Planning Perspectives.

Also in this issue:

"Gender Relations and Reproductive Decision Making In Honduras," by Ilene S. Speizer et al. of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

"Contraceptive Use Among the Poor in Indonesia," by Juan Schoemaker of Johns Hopkins University.

"Use of Family Planning Services in the Transition To a Static Clinic System in Bangladesh: 1998-2002" by Alex Mercer et al. of the Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

"The Incidence of Induced Abortion in the Philippines: Current Level and Recent Trends," by Fatima Juarez of El Colegio de Mexico, Mexico City et al.

Printer-friendly version

Share

Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.