Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
News Release
December 12, 2005

Parents and Teens are Communicating About Sexual Health Issues, New Research Shows

In a recent national survey of more than 1,500 teens at family planning clinics, a majority of women younger than 18 reported good relationships with their parents and said that they had talked with their parents about sex and birth control, according to a study published in the December 2005 issue of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. Substantial proportions of teens had talked with their parents extensively about such topics as how to say no to sex (42%), where to get prescription birth control (32%) and how to prevent STDs (33%). Only 7% reported that they had not talked with their parents about any of these or several other sexual health issues.

Although more than half of the young women reported that their mothers disapproved of their having sex, nearly two-thirds thought that their mothers would want them to use birth control if they did have sex. In fact, 60% of teens indicated that a parent knew about their clinic visit; among those, 40% were there at a parent’s recommendation. In addition, most teens (nearly seven in 10) were highly connected with their parents, a factor that is associated with a decreased likelihood of risky behaviors.

A second article in the same issue of Perspectives evaluates one program that aims to help parents guide their children through puberty. Parents who participated in Saving Sex for Later—a program whose participation requires only that parents listen to three CDs, when and where they can—felt better able to communicate with their children about risky behavior and pubertal development, and thought that they had greater influence over their children’s behavior than parents in the study’s control group. This relatively simple intervention was shown to be effective in promoting positive parenting practices among parents who are typically difficult to reach because of economic hardship, full schedules and complicated lives, in communities where rates of early sexual initiation are high and negative consequences of teenage sexual activity are great.

"Parents and teens should keep the lines of communication around sexual health issues open, and there are some good programs in place that help that to happen" says the Guttmacher Institute’s senior research associate Rachel Jones. "We need to ensure that both parents and teens have the education and services they need to communicate effectively. However, teens should not be legally required to talk to their parents—you can’t legislate positive parent-child relations."

"Parent-Child Relations Among Minor Females Attending U.S. Family Planning Clinics" was written by Rachel K. Jones et al. of the Guttmacher Institute.

"Saving Sex for Later: An Evaluation of a Parent Education Intervention" was written by Lydia O’Donnell et al. of the Education Development Center, Newton, MA.

Also in this issue:

"Social-Cognitive Predictors of Consistent Condom Use Among Young People in Moscow," by Natalia Bobrova et al.;

"Pregnancy Planning Status and Health Behaviors Among Nonpregnant Women in a California Managed Health Care Organization," by Kathleen Green-Raleigh et al.;

"Consistency of Condom Use Among Low-Income Hormonal Contraceptive Users," by Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar et al.

Printer-friendly version

Share

Media Contact

  • Rebecca Wind

    Guttmacher Institute
    212 248 1953
    [email protected]
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.