Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
News Release
June 13, 2007

One in Four Women at Risk of Unplanned Pregnancy Experience Gaps in Contraceptive Use or Do Not Use a Method at All

Health Care Providers Can Play a Crucial Role in Reducing Women’s Risk

Fifteen percent of U.S. women in a recent survey who were at risk of unplanned pregnancy had had a gap in contraceptive use of one or more months during the previous year, while 8% had not used any method, according to "Factors Associated with Contraceptive Use and Nonuse, United States, 2004," by Jennifer J. Frost et al., published in the June issue of Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. Failure to use contraceptives while remaining sexually active places women at extremely high risk for unplanned pregnancy. This study sought to assess why women experience gaps in contraceptive use and which groups of women are most affected.

Frost’s analysis found that women with less than a college education, women who were ambivalent about avoiding pregnancy and those who felt they could not call their provider with contraceptive use questions had elevated odds of having had a gap in contraceptive use or having not used any contraceptive for the entire year. Other characteristics that were strongly associated with either contraceptive nonuse or having had a gap in use included older age, being black or on Medicaid, not currently being in a relationship, having infrequent sex and being dissatisfied with one’s contraceptive method.

"The typical American woman wants—and has—two children, which means she spends roughly three decades trying to avoid becoming pregnant," says Frost, a senior research associate with the Guttmacher Institute. "It is difficult for many women to find a contraceptive method that meets their needs and to use it continuously, especially during periods of method dissatisfaction or personal transition; and it is even more difficult for some women than for others. This analysis suggests that health care providers in particular can play an important role in helping those women at greatest risk meet their contraceptive needs."

The authors recommend that health care providers be encouraged to identify those women with ambivalent attitudes toward pregnancy, those having difficulty using their method and those with an elevated risk of unplanned pregnancy because of disadvantage or relationship instability. By identifying women who are at greatest risk, providers will be better able to offer appropriate, comprehensive counseling and assistance regarding which method best fits their needs and how to avoid an unwanted pregnancy.

Printer-friendly version

Share

Media Contact

  • Rebecca Wind

    Guttmacher Institute
    212 248 1953
    [email protected]
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.