Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Financials
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Impact Report 2025

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Join our community

  • Ways to Give
  • Sign up for our newsletter
  • Contact
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Financials
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Impact Report 2025

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Join our community

  • Ways to Give
  • Sign up for our newsletter
  • Contact
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
News Release
October 22, 2026

New Guttmacher Analysis Shows that as Access to Telehealth Abortion Increased, Inter-State Travel for Abortion Decreased

Data show the impact of shield law provision on abortion access in states with total bans from 2023 to 2025

Published today in JAMA Network Open, "Telehealth Provision and Travel For Abortion Care in States With Total Bans, 2023–2025," analyzes how people in states with total abortion bans access care. Specifically, the study seeks to understand how the introduction of shield laws starting in July 2023, which protect clinicians who provide abortion care via telehealth to patients in all states, including those with total abortion bans, may have impacted out-of-state travel for abortion care. 

The study uses data from Guttmacher's Monthly Abortion Provision Study to compare changes in the number of abortion seekers in 13 total-ban states who traveled out of state for care versus those that obtained medication abortion via telehealth from a shield law provider. 

Key Findings

  • In 2023, the number of residents of total-ban states who traveled out of state to access abortion care (89,620) was more than three times higher than the number who accessed care via telehealth (24,460). 
  • By 2025, the majority of residents in total-ban states obtained their abortion via telehealth: 90,460, compared to 64,590 who traveled out-of-state for care.  

“The data are clear: the implementation of shield law provision has had a major impact on how and where people access abortion care in restrictive policy environments,” says Rachel K. Jones, Guttmacher principal research scientist and study co-author. “While travel remains a critically important avenue for care, especially for people at later gestational durations or with a preference for in-person care, the ability to receive abortion pills in the mail has improved access for tens of thousands of people living in states with total abortion bans.”  

You can read the full article here.

To speak with one of the study authors or to learn more about Guttmacher’s abortion research, email [email protected]. 

Printer-friendly version

Share

Read More

Initiative

Monthly Abortion Provision Study

State Laws and Policies

Shield Laws Related to Sexual and Reproductive Health Care

Report

Full-Year 2025 Estimates Show Overall Stability in Abortion Incidence, Decreased Travel and Increased Telehealth Provision

Fact Sheet

How Innovative Uses of Telehealth Can Support Abortion Access

Media Contact

  • Media Office

    Guttmacher Institute
    [email protected]
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.