Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
News Release
April 11, 2007

Innovative Mexican Health Policy Increases Contraceptive Use

Talking to pregnant women about using family planning is an effective strategy for increasing their contraceptive use after they give birth, according to a study examining a change in Mexico’s national guidelines for prenatal care.

To improve maternal health by helping women plan and space their births, Mexico requires providers to offer family planning counseling during all prenatal care visits at public clinics. The policy takes into account the fact that most women do not want to get pregnant again immediately after giving birth and are therefore more receptive to information about contraception.

The article, "Family Planning Advice and Postpartum Contraceptive Use Among Low-Income Women in Mexico," by Sarah L. Barber of the University of California, Berkeley, appears in the March 2007 issue of International Family Planning Perspectives.

Barber analyzed 2003 and 2004 surveys of more than 2,200 women who had recently given birth in urban Mexico and found that about half—47%—were using contraceptives. Women who had received family planning counseling during prenatal visits were more than twice as likely to use a contraceptive method after they gave birth as women who had not received this information. Prenatal family planning counseling was particularly effective in encouraging women to begin using the IUD; women who had received counseling were five times as likely as those who had not to use this method. They were also more likely to rely on condoms or sterilization.

This study underscores the need for policies to support integration efforts, including training prenatal care providers to help women choose appropriate contraceptives after giving birth.

Also in this issue:

"Factors Affecting Vasectomy Acceptability in Tanzania," by Arwen Bunce of Family Health International, et al.;

"Family Planning Programs in 2004: New Assessments in a Changing Environment," by John Ross of Constella Futures, et al.; and

"Inconsistencies in the Relationship Between Contraceptive Use and Fertility in Bangladesh," by Unnati Rani Saha of International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, and Radheshyam Bairagi of Fordham University.

Printer-friendly version

Share

Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.