Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Global Public Health

Rohingya women’s knowledge and perceptions about pregnancy termination in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh: A community-based study

Rohingya with Cox

Authors

Ann M. Moore, Guttmacher Institute Kaosar Afsana, BRAC James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University Pragna Paramita Mondal, BRAC James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University Mira Tignor, Guttmacher Institute Octavia Mulhern, Guttmacher Institute Rubina Hussain, Guttmacher Institute Altaf Hossain, Association for Prevention of Septic Abortion

The displaced Rohingya population residing in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, must navigate their reproductive lives in this fragile context. This study examines the knowledge, attitudes and use of menstrual regulation/pregnancy termination services in four displaced persons' camps to understand women’s engagement with these services and barriers to safe services using Bandura’s social cognitive theory. We conducted a household, community-based survey with women of reproductive age in 2022 (n = 1173). Ninety-two percent of respondents knew that health facilities provide pregnancy terminations, yet knowledge about when access is permissible is incomplete. Only one-third knew that this service could be provided 11−12 weeks after last menstrual period, with most respondents believing that the cutoff was earlier. The respondents believed that menstrual regulation was provided only under certain conditions, and 99% stated that a husband’s consent should be required for a woman to end a pregnancy (always or sometimes). One in five respondents (n = 223) knew someone who had ended a pregnancy since arriving in the camps. While knowledge about and support for pregnancy termination services are high, there is room for improvement in education about the conditions under which it can be accessed. The results fill a knowledge gap regarding the acceptability and use of pregnancy termination in the Bangladesh camps of displaced Rohingya.

Read the full study.

First published on Global Public Health: November 23, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2583145
Source / Available for Purchase
DOI:

Share

Topic

Global

  • Abortion

Geography

  • Global
  • Asia: Bangladesh
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.