Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Video
September 26, 2025

Dr. Onikepe Owolabi at Foreign Policy Magazine’s Her Power Forum

Dr. Onikepe Owolabi emphasizes redefining family planning need through women’s expressed demand, urging policymakers to prioritize adolescent access and last‑mile services in humanitarian contexts. 

Transcript: I want to hone in on the concept of need, because need is one of the most critical factors for those of us who work in measuring family planning.  

And why need? Need helps us really think carefully about what we need to provide high-quality family planning services that align with the principles of voluntariness and that really listen to what women want, which I think is something we've heard all the former speakers say.  

Now, for a long time, the family planning field has traditionally defined need based on the number of women who say they want to avoid a pregnancy and are not using a modern contraceptive method. So, those women actually haven't been explicitly asked, "What do you want?" Because we know that wanting to avoid pregnancy doesn't directly translate into wanting to use a method. But because we all know that we need the voices of women in our programs, in these estimates and in collaboration with many of our colleagues, we've moved into defining a much more nuanced measure of need. One that takes account of the fact that women want to prevent pregnancies, but we're now starting to look at the number of women who have explicitly said, "Yes, I would like to use a method or I intend to use one in future."  

And why is this really critical? Understanding and segmenting out this smaller subgroup is very important for policymakers, because when you're trying to prioritize limited investments, this is the right first subgroup to go to with in your national budgets. They want to prevent pregnancies. They've expressed a clear need for it, which doesn't undermine their agency. And so, if you're thinking of the narrowest definition of, "Where should I put my funds as a policymaker?" those are the women you want to target. You're going to get a lot of bang for your buck. It's not going to be wasted.  

Now, having said so, it wouldn't serve us well, as people who respect all women and girls, to just focus on one subgroup, because we know that sometimes need is tied to the context you live in. Your culture, your environment, your stigma.  

And so drawing on our data, we see that adolescent women who express this new nuanced need, which we're calling 'unmet demand', have three times as much unmet demand as all other women of reproductive age. And so when you think of that definition of need, even though some people think that it's very uncomfortable to talk about adolescent access to contraception, this is a group that has expressed a great need for it. And so when governments are thinking of prioritizing investment, you want to find a way to get it into the hands of those people.  

But then I'm going to end by saying something. Sometimes it feels very challenging to reach the last mile. Sometimes we don't even have the services that capture need in the last mile. But when we think of women in humanitarian contexts in Gaza, in Ukraine, in sub-Saharan Africa, we know that they express a strong need for family planning methods. Regardless of what happens, people have sex, but they don't necessarily want to get pregnant. These women are exposed to a greater risk of gender-based violence and sexual violence. And so whilst we think of funneling resources and really getting need to low-hanging fruit, we need to remember that reaching the last mile is absolutely critical and we can't neglect it because it's too hard to do. 

Share

Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.