Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
News Release
May 1, 2026

Fifth Circuit Decision Directs FDA to Restrict Mifepristone Access

If allowed to stand, this decision would be the most sweeping threat to abortion since the overturning of Roe

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ruling in State of Louisiana et al. v. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) et al, ordering the FDA to temporarily reimpose medically unnecessary in-person dispensing requirements on mifepristone—and upending abortion access nationwide. An emergency appeal to the US Supreme Court will likely follow swiftly, and we will share relevant updates as they occur.

This litigation was initiated by plaintiffs seeking to reimpose in-person dispensing and other restrictions that the FDA permanently removed from the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) for mifepristone in 2023, in line with robust research showing they were not medically necessary. A federal district court paused the case in early April to give the FDA time to complete a safety review of mifepristone that it had initiated at the urging of anti-abortion groups, despite overwhelming evidence that the drug is safe and effective. After the district court ruling, plaintiffs quickly appealed to the Fifth Circuit to reimpose the in-person dispensing requirement. 

The end goal of this legal attack is to eliminate telehealth prescribing, pharmacy dispensing, and mailing of mifepristone nationwide, including in states that have not enacted total abortion bans. 

Below, we’re sharing a statement from our vice president for public policy, along with key data and resources: 

Statement from Kelly Baden, Vice President for Public Policy at the Guttmacher Institute:  

“The decision is a stunning and deeply alarming development.  Reimposing medically unnecessary in-person dispensing requirements for mifepristone will send shockwaves of chaos and confusion across the country and dramatically upend patients’ ability to obtain abortion care.

“While this is not the final word on the case, this decision represents the most sweeping threat to abortion since the overturning of Roe v. Wade. If allowed to stand, it would severely restrict access to mifepristone in every state, including those where abortion is broadly legal and where voters have acted to protect abortion rights.

“This move runs counter to decades of scientific evidence from the United States and around the world that overwhelmingly affirms that mifepristone is safe and effective whether provided in person or via telehealth. Data from the Guttmacher Institute show that medication abortion accounts for roughly two out of every three abortions nationwide, while the Society of Family Planning finds that one in four abortions are provided via telehealth.

“Patients should not be forced to navigate ever-changing restrictions that disregard evidence and established standards of care. But abortion providers and support networks have shown amazing resilience and tenacity since the Dobbs decision—and they will continue to do what they can do to ensure that everyone, regardless of where they live, can access the abortion care they need.” 

Here’s what the data show about medication abortion use and how reinstating in-person dispensing requirements could upend the abortion care landscape: 

  • 65% of abortions in the United States were medication abortions in 2023.

Guttmacher data on medication abortion in states without total bans: 

  • Medication abortion accounted for the majority of abortions provided in most US states without total abortion bans in 2023—with proportions being the lowest in the District of Columbia (44%) and Ohio (46%) and the highest in Montana (84%) and Wyoming (95%).

Data on medication abortion in states with total bans, including Louisiana: 

  • As of April 23, 2026, 13 states are enforcing total bans on abortion care. 
  • New data from Guttmacher’s Monthly Abortion Provision Study show 91,000 abortions were provided via telehealth to states with total bans in 2025—this includes 9,350 abortions provided via telehealth to Louisiana. 
  • Louisiana has been one of the primary states attacking shield law providers. In January 2025, Louisiana issued the first criminal indictment of an abortion provider after the Dobbs decision, alleging that a New York physician provided abortion pills via telehealth to a Louisiana teenager.

Any decision that reimposes medically unnecessary restrictions on mifepristone would cause major disruptions to abortion provision and further limit patients’ options. 

  • The two-drug combination of mifepristone and misoprostol accounted for more than 98% of medication abortions in the United States in 2020, the last year for which comprehensive data are available. 
  • Misoprostol-only medication abortion regimens are supported by leading professional and medical organizations in the United States and around the world. However, it is unclear how widely a misoprostol-only protocol might be offered by abortion providers if mifepristone provision were restricted or to what extent it would be taken up by patients. 
Printer-friendly version

Share

Read More

Policy Analysis

Medication Abortion Accounted for 63% of All US Abortions in 2023—An Increase from 53% in 2020

Resource

Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe

Initiative

Monthly Abortion Provision Study

Media Contact

  • Media Office

    Guttmacher Institute
    [email protected]

Topic

United States

  • Abortion

Tags

medication abortion
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.