Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Policy Analysis
June 2026

Locked Away and Left to Expire: The Trump Administration's Destructive Denial of Contraceptive Care

Global Gag Rule preview image

Authors

Samira Damavandi, Guttmacher Institute Jessica D. Rosenberg, Guttmacher Institute

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

The Trump administration has wasted $434,317 in taxpayer dollars since January 2025 to store contraceptives that it refuses to distribute to women and girls in low-income countries. A report from the Office of Inspector General of US Agency for International Development (USAID) reveals that the administration has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in storage and transportation costs for the $9.7 million worth of family planning supplies that it abandoned in Belgium rather than allowing them to be used. (The supplies were originally purchased by USAID.) With every additional month that passes after June 2026, the administration will spend over $24,000 to store these products, which include birth control pills, implants, injectable contraceptives and IUDs.

This wasteful misuse of US government resources is part of the fallout from the administration’s disastrous and chaotic dismantling of USAID last year, which has already denied tens of millions of people in low-income countries access to the family planning services on which they relied to improve their health and futures.

The report also finds that $8 million of the withheld contraceptives are now expired or unusable due to their removal from temperature-controlled storage. Currently just $1.7 million of these products are still in usable condition. These contraceptive commodities were meant to be distributed in various low- income countries, primarily in Sub-Saharan Africa.

The tremendous waste and harm caused by withholding these products is two-fold. First, had they been distributed, these contraceptives could have provided pregnancy prevention for more than 650,000 people for up to one year, and for 950,000 people for three to 10 years, depending on the contraceptive method. Second, the money the administration is spending on transportation and storage costs could have otherwise gone toward the provision of essential reproductive health care.

The $434,317 wasted on storage fees since January 2025 would have been enough to provide modern contraceptive care to 43,900 women and couples, according to our latest Guttmacher Institute analysis. For each subsequent month that the commodities are not distributed, the wasted funds could provide an additional 2,500 women and couples with modern contraceptive care.

If this funding had been spent on providing, rather than denying care, it would have had immense benefits for women’s lives and reproductive health outcomes.

Providing modern contraceptive care to 43,900 additional women could have averted 15,700 unintended pregnancies, as well as 4,800 unsafe abortions, and could have resulted in 24 maternal lives saved.

The process of denying this lifesaving contraceptive care began in early 2025, with the stop work order and foreign aid freeze at the beginning of Trump’s second term—actions that ultimately led to the dismantling of the US foreign assistance apparatus and USAID. Amid that chaos, the administration went out of its way to prevent the distribution of these contraceptive commodities, which had already been purchased by USAID. The administration refused to sell the contraceptives to the nongovernmental organizations and UN agencies, such as the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), that had offered to purchase them and distribute them themselves. In July 2025, the State Department sought to incinerate the health products using additional taxpayer dollars, trying to justify the destruction by falsely claiming that the contraceptives were “abortifacients.” However, the plan to destroy these products was subsequently blocked by local law in Belgium.

For decades, Congress has recognized the importance of international family planning with bipartisan support. The Trump administration should immediately distribute these contraceptives as per longstanding US commitments, allow a nongovernmental organization to purchase and distribute them, or donate them. Further, the administration must act with transparency and accountability to ensure that all family planning assistance appropriated by Congress is spent as intended. In the face of the State Department’s current refusal to act, members of Congress have introduced the bipartisan “Saving Lives and Taxpayer Dollars Act,” which would require that foreign assistance commodities be made available for their intended purposes before they expire. Congress should move swiftly to pass this legislation.

Methodology

The total funding amount spent on storage and transportation costs from January 2025 through June 2026 was calculated based on the information outlined in the USAID Inspector General’s Management Advisory published on June 10, 2026. Specifically, the report indicates that $360,667 had been spent on storage and transportation costs as of March 31, 2026. This was combined with the monthly storage fee incurred since then of $24,550 per month. The fees from January 2025 through March 2026 were added to the monthly storage fees incurred from April 1, 2026 through June 30, 2026, to get a total of $434,317.

The number of women and couples that would have been served with these funds was calculated based on estimates from the Guttmacher Institute’s Just the Numbers analysis for fiscal year 2024. The total funds spent to date and the monthly spending going forward were divided by the average cost-per-user for providing modern contraceptive care in countries that previously received US family planning foreign assistance in FY24.

Acknowledgments

This analysis was edited by Ian Lague. Additional support was provided by Amy Friedrich-Karnik and Elizabeth Sully.

First published online: June 22, 2026

Share

Printer-friendly version

Read More

Policy Analysis

Just the Numbers: The Impact of US International Family Planning Assistance, 2024

Opinion

The Ripple Effects of the US Retreat from International Reproductive Care

Ms. Magazine
Policy Analysis

Six Months In: How the Trump Administration Is Undermining Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Globally

Topic

Global

  • Abortion
  • Pregnancy

Geography

  • Global
  • Northern America: United States

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.