Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
F&S Reports

Contraceptive use and unfulfilled preferences among women ages 15–49 years in the United States, 2022–2023

Authors

Mia R. Zolna, Guttmacher Institute Doris W. Chiu, Guttmacher Institute Megan L. Kavanaugh, Guttmacher Institute

Objective

To update estimates of, and examine the intersection between, method-specific contraceptive use and unfulfilled contraceptive preferences for US women ages 15–49 years since multiple events (e.g., 2019 Title X Final Rule, COVID-19 pandemic) disrupted reproductive health access in the United States. We situate findings within the changing health policy climate and broader evidence base.

Design

This secondary analysis uses the recently available 2022–2023 National Survey of Family Growth, a cross-sectional population-based household survey of US women ages 15–49. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify associations between individual's characteristics, method-specific contraceptive use, and unfulfilled contraceptive preferences.

Subjects

The full sample of female respondents ages 15–49 (n = 5,586) and subsamples: all contraceptive users including permanent female method users (n = 3,163), contraceptive users and single-method users–both excluding those using only permanent female methods to address data constraints (n = 2,564 and n = 1,861 respectively), and contraceptive nonusers (n = 1,451).

Exposure

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Current contraceptive use, method-specific use accounting for multiple methods, and unfulfilled contraceptive preferences because of cost.

Results

In 2022–2023, 57% of women (42.8 million) reported currently using contraception for any reason. The most common methods were oral contraceptive pill (23%), condom (21%), female permanent methods (20%), withdrawal (19%), and intrauterine device (16%). One-quarter (22%) of users reported multiple methods. Thirteen percent of users preferred a different method, and 31% of nonusers preferred to start a method, if cost were not a worry. Higher levels of unfulfilled contraceptive preferences among users were associated with identifying as a sexual minority (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.63; confidence interval [CI]: 1.17–2.27) and among nonusers younger than age 40 (aOR = 1.58–2.26; CI: 1.02–4.85) or not married or cohabiting (aOR = 2.49; CI: 1.68–3.69). Among single-method users, 23% using coital-dependent methods, 11% using short-acting methods, and 7% using long-acting methods, reported unfulfilled contraceptive preferences.

Conclusion

Most US women used their preferred contraceptive method; however, barriers remain. Although trend analyses were not feasible because of changes in survey design, unfulfilled preferences were lower compared with other population-level studies; the extent to which this represents true shifts or shifts in data quality remains unclear. Healthcare systems grounded in sexual and reproductive equity and that reduce costs are needed to increase access to preferred methods.

First published on F&S Reports: May 21, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2026.05.002
Source / Available for Purchase
Read the full article at F&S REports.

Share

Topic

United States

  • Contraception

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

birth control
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.