Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Guttmacher Policy Review

  1. April 2001 Policy Analysis

    President Bush Sends His Proposed FY 2002 Budget to Congress

    Cynthia Dailard Guttmacher Policy Review
  2. August 2001 Policy Analysis

    The States at Midyear: Major Actions on Reproductive Health-Related Issues

    Adam Sonfield Guttmacher Policy Review
  3. February 2001 Policy Analysis

    High Court Invalidates Involuntary Drug Tests On Pregnant Women

    Elizabeth Nash Guttmacher Policy Review
  4. August 2001 Policy Analysis

    Reproductive Health Politics and Policy in Congress: Where Things Stand

    Susan A. Cohen Guttmacher Policy Review
  5. December 2001 Policy Analysis

    Islam, Women and Family Planning: A Primer

    Heather D. Boonstra Guttmacher Policy Review
  6. April 2001 Policy Analysis

    Appeals Court Rules For Antiabortion Site

    Adam Sonfield Guttmacher Policy Review
  7. August 2001 Policy Analysis

    Administration's New Medicaid Rules Could Limit Family Planning

    Guttmacher Policy Review
  8. February 2001 Policy Analysis

    Title X: Three Decades of Accomplishment

    Rachel Benson Gold Guttmacher Policy Review
  9. December 2001 Policy Analysis

    State Policy in 2001: Major Reproductive Health-Related Developments

    Rachel Benson Gold and Elizabeth Nash Guttmacher Policy Review
  10. December 2001 Policy Analysis

    Anthrax Threats, Continued Violence Prompt Renewed Attention to Clinic, Client Protection

    Vitoria Lin Guttmacher Policy Review
  11. June 2001 Policy Analysis

    Expanding Eligibility And Improving Outreach Under CHIP

    Rachel Benson Gold and Adam Sonfield Guttmacher Policy Review
  12. June 2001 Policy Analysis

    Report Says Sex Ed Can Reduce Pregnancy, Jury Out on Ab-Only

    Elizabeth Nash Guttmacher Policy Review
  13. October 2000 Policy Analysis

    California Program Shows Benefits of Expanding Family Planning Eligibility

    Rachel Benson Gold Guttmacher Policy Review
  14. February 2000 Policy Analysis

    The States in 1999: Actions on Major Reproductive Health - Related Issues

    Adam Sonfield, Anjali Dalal and Elizabeth Nash Guttmacher Policy Review
  15. February 2000 Policy Analysis

    Refusing to Participate In Health Care: A Continuing Debate

    Rachel Benson Gold and Adam Sonfield Guttmacher Policy Review

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Current page 31
  • Page 32
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.