Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Safe Abortion Calculator
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases
  • Videos

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Guttmacher Policy Review

  1. August 2001 Policy Analysis

    Administration's New Medicaid Rules Could Limit Family Planning

    Guttmacher Policy Review
  2. February 2001 Policy Analysis

    Title X: Three Decades of Accomplishment

    Rachel Benson Gold Guttmacher Policy Review
  3. December 2001 Policy Analysis

    State Policy in 2001: Major Reproductive Health-Related Developments

    Rachel Benson Gold and Elizabeth Nash Guttmacher Policy Review
  4. December 2001 Policy Analysis

    Anthrax Threats, Continued Violence Prompt Renewed Attention to Clinic, Client Protection

    Vitoria Lin Guttmacher Policy Review
  5. June 2001 Policy Analysis

    Expanding Eligibility And Improving Outreach Under CHIP

    Rachel Benson Gold and Adam Sonfield Guttmacher Policy Review
  6. June 2001 Policy Analysis

    Report Says Sex Ed Can Reduce Pregnancy, Jury Out on Ab-Only

    Elizabeth Nash Guttmacher Policy Review
  7. June 2001 Policy Analysis

    Campaign Touts Family Planning Benefits for Mothers and Children

    Vitoria Lin Guttmacher Policy Review
  8. April 2001 Policy Analysis

    New Rules Issued to Govern Delivery of Family Planning Under Medicaid Managed Care

    Rachel Benson Gold Guttmacher Policy Review
  9. October 2001 Policy Analysis

    Administration Softens Stance on Medicaid Family Planning Waivers

    Rachel Benson Gold Guttmacher Policy Review
  10. April 2001 Policy Analysis

    Challenges Facing Family Planning Clinics And Title X

    Cynthia Dailard Guttmacher Policy Review
  11. August 2001 Policy Analysis

    State-Level Policies on Sexuality, STD Education

    Rachel Benson Gold and Elizabeth Nash Guttmacher Policy Review
  12. October 2001 Policy Analysis

    Three States Awarded 'Illegitimacy Bonus,' But Questions Abound

    Vitoria Lin Guttmacher Policy Review
  13. February 2000 Policy Analysis

    Refusing to Participate In Health Care: A Continuing Debate

    Rachel Benson Gold and Adam Sonfield Guttmacher Policy Review
  14. October 2000 Policy Analysis

    The States in 2000: Major Actions on Reproductive Health-Related Issues

    Elizabeth Nash Guttmacher Policy Review
  15. August 2000 Policy Analysis

    Minors and the Right to Consent to Health Care

    Heather D. Boonstra and Elizabeth Nash Guttmacher Policy Review

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Current page 31
  • Page 32
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.