Image
2X MATCH: Stop Attacks on Bodily Autonomy. The fight for reproductive freedom has never been more urgent. Thanks to a limited-time 2X match offer, your gift today will have TWICE the impact. Help power critical research and policy advocacy to protect and advance reproductive health care worldwide. Double My Impact.
Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Report
November 2009

Benefits of Meeting the Contraceptive Needs of Ugandan Women

Author(s)

Michael Vlassoff, Aparna Sundaram and Akinrinola Bankole

Some Ugandan women are able to have the number of children they want when they want to have them. However, the majority lack full access to reproductive health services, including quality contraceptive services. As a result, many women bear children before they are ready to and have more than they can care for. Others resort to unsafe abortion, which can have dire health consequences.

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Key Points

Key Points

• As of 2008, an estimated 56% of all pregnancies in Uganda are unintended. Unintended pregnancy is highest in the West Nile region (64%) and lowest in the Southwest (49%).


• Seven in 10 women who want to avoid pregnancy either do not practice contraception or use an ineffective (traditional) method. These women have an unmet need for a modern method of family planning.


• Meeting just half of this unmet need would result in 519,000 fewer unintended pregnancies each year, which would lead to 152,000 fewer induced abortions and 1,600 fewer maternal deaths. Women in disadvantaged households and regions currently experience the worst maternal health outcomes and would benefit the most from reducing unmet need.


• If all unmet need for modern methods were satisfied, maternal mortality would drop by 40%, and unplanned births and induced abortions would decline by 84–85%.
• Investing in contraceptive commodities and services to fill all unmet need would result in a net savings of US$112 million (194 billion Ugandan shillings) over what would otherwise be spent on costs associated with unplanned pregnancies and births. For every dollar spent, more than three dollars would be saved.

• All stakeholders, including the Ugandan government, should increase their investment in modern contraceptive services. Particular attention should be paid to meeting the needs of poor Ugandan women to reduce inequalities in access.

*By modern contraceptives, we mean sterilization (male or
female), pills, IUDs, injectables, implants and male
condoms.
*Maternal mortality is difficult to measure,
and estimates range from 435 maternal
deaths per 100,000 live births, according to
the 2006 Ugandan Demographic and Health
Survey (UDHS),4 to 550, according to the
World Health Organization (WHO).7 We use
the WHO estimate here for two reasons: First,
unlike the UDHS figure, the WHO estimate has
been adjusted for underreporting and
misclassification of maternal deaths. Second,
the 550 per 100,000 is very close to the
Ugandan Ministry of Health estimate of 541
per 100,000, which is based on routine
reporting of data from districts and health
facilities (source: unpublished 2008 data from
the Health Management Information System,
Ugandan Ministry of Health).
*This definition of unmet need differs from
the standard definition used in DHS surveys
in two ways. First, our denominator is
narrowed to women who are sexually active,
are able to become pregnant, and want to
limit or postpone childbearing, but the DHS
denominator encompasses all married women
(and, for some countries, sexually active
unmarried women as well) regardless of their
childbearing intentions; likewise, we restrict
the denominator for contraceptive prevalence
to just women who want to avoid pregnancy.
Second, we include women using traditional
methods in our definition of those with
unmet need, because traditional methods
have relatively high failure rates,16 leaving
women vulnerable to unintended pregnancy
and its negative consequences.
*We present all costs in 2008 U.S.
dollars. Net savings are also presented
in Ugandan shillings, using the average
exchange rate for the period: 1,735.67
Ugandan shillings per dollar.

Share

Download Report

Topic

Global

  • Contraception

Geography

  • Global
  • Africa: Uganda
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.