Skip to main content

Guttmacher Institute

Donate Now

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • COVID-19 impact
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Search form

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email
Guttmacher Institute

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Donate Now

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • COVID-19 impact
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship

Search form

As of August 1, 2022 State Laws and Policies

Abortion Bans in Cases of Sex or Race Selection or Genetic Anomaly

Background

Laws and policies on abortion have been changing rapidly across the United States since the US Supreme Court overturned the federal constitutional right to abortion in late June in Dobbs v. Jackson. As a result, some information here may be out of date. Our team is working diligently to update this resource. Thank you for your patience.

 

State legislatures are adopting numerous abortion restrictions targeting very specific pregnancy conditions and populations. In recent years, members of Congress have introduced federal legislation that would prohibit abortions based on the sex or race of the fetus.

Sex-selective abortions—that is, abortions performed because of the predicted sex of the fetus—occur most frequently where there is a strong gender bias that manifests in a preference for sons. In some countries, such as those in East and South Asia, the widespread practice of sex selection has resulted in skewed sex ratios with a higher number of boys than girls at birth. In contrast, in the United States, there is limited and inconclusive evidence that immigrants from these areas—or anywhere else—are obtaining sex-selective abortions. Bans on sex-selective abortions place a burden on providers, who are forced to question each person’s reasons for seeking an abortion, and to second-guess and stigmatize Asian American patients and communities in particular. While disguised as a means to eliminate gender discrimination, these laws make abortion less accessible; they do not prohibit other sex selection methods, such as sperm sorting or preimplantation genetic diagnostics.

Arizona enacted legislation that prohibits a person from aborting a fetus because of race, thereby focusing on the race of the person seeking an abortion and placing providers in the position of having to question their patients' motivations. Antiabortion legislators and activists claim that abortion providers are targeting Latina and African American people in their communities, relying on statistics showing that these women of color have higher rates of abortions than White women. In fact, six in 10 abortion providers are located in majority-White neighborhoods. Moreover, data show that women of color face higher rates of unintended pregnancies, which leads to higher rates of abortion (see Abortion and Women of Color: The Bigger Picture). 

In 2013, North Dakota was the first state to prohibit abortions in cases of fetal abnormality, even in cases where the fetus has a condition that is incompatible with life and will die before or soon after birth. Multiple states have implemented counseling requirements for people seeking abortion to include information on perinatal hospice services.

Visit our state legislation tracker for policy activity on all sexual and reproductive health topics.

Highlights

  • 11 states ban abortions for reason of sex selection at some point in pregnancy.

  • 4 states prohibit abortions for reasons of race.

  • 6 states prohibit abortions when the fetus may have a genetic anomaly.

    • 3 states require counseling on perinatal hospice services available before a patient can undergo an abortion if it may be based on a lethal fetal condition.

    • Kansas requires counseling on perinatal hospice services before an abortion can be performed.

Printer-friendly version

For more information

  • Public Policy Office

    202-296-4012
    [email protected]

Topic

United States

  • Abortion: Demographics, State Policies on Abortion

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Related Content

News in Context

Claim that Most Abortion Clinics Are Located in Black or Hispanic Neighborhoods Is False

Policy Analysis

A Problem-and-Solution Mismatch: Son Preference and Sex-Selective Abortion Bans

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Abortion and Women of Color: The Bigger Picture

Guttmacher Policy Review

 

Abortion Bans in Cases of Sex or Race Selection or Genetic Anomaly

STATE

PROHIBITS ABORTION IN CASE OF:

 

Sex Selection

Race Selection

Genetic Anomaly

Arizona

X

X

s

Arkansas

X

 

s

Illinois

▼*

 

 

Indiana

▼

▼

▼

Kansas

X

 

†

Kentucky

s

s

s

Louisiana

 

 

s

Minnesota

 
 
†

Mississippi

X X X

Missouri

X 

X

X

North Carolina

X

 

 

North Dakota

X

 

X

Ohio

 

 

X

Oklahoma

X

 

†

Pennsylvania

X

 

 

South Dakota

X

 

X 

Tennessee

X

X X

Utah

 

 

‡

TOTAL

11

4

6

▼ Enforcement permanently enjoined by court order; policy not in effect.
s Law is temporarily enjoined, policy is not in effect.
*  Illinois's ban applies after viability; in 1993, a federal court enjoined the portion of the bill that applies before viability.
†  Minnesota and Oklahoma require counseling on perinatal hospice services if an abortion is sought due to a lethal fetal abnormality. Arizona requires counseling about perinatal hospice services if an abortion is sought due to a lethal fetal abnormality, as well as counseling on outcomes for those living with the condition that the fetus is diagnosed with if the abortion is sought for a nonlethal fetal condition. Kansas requires counseling on perinatal hospice services before all abortions.

‡  Utah's ban will only take effect if a court decision allows states to ban abortion in these cases. 

 

Get updates on policy issues and more

Sign up for Guttmacher updates

Get the latest research and policy analyses on sexual and reproductive health and rights around the world.

Subscribe
Guttmacher Institute
Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?
Donate Now
Follow Guttmacher:

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Footer Menu

  • Privacy Policy
© 2022 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.

Get our updates & newsletters