Skip to main content

Guttmacher Institute

Donate Now

Highlights

  • COVID-19 impact
  • Adding It Up
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Asia
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • United States
  • Explore our partnerships

Who We Are

  • About us
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Partnerships
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship

Search form

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email
Guttmacher Institute

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Donate Now

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email

Highlights

  • COVID-19 impact
  • Adding It Up
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Asia
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • United States
  • Explore our partnerships

Who We Are

  • About us
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Partnerships
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship

Search form

As of November 1, 2020 State Laws and Policies

Abortion Bans in Cases of Sex or Race Selection or Genetic Anomaly

Background

State legislatures are adopting numerous abortion restrictions targeting very specific pregnancy conditions and populations of women. In recent years, members of Congress have introduced federal legislation that would prohibit abortions based on the sex or race of the fetus.

Sex-selective abortions—that is, abortions performed because of the predicted sex of the fetus—occur most frequently where there is a strong gender bias that manifests in a preference for sons. In some countries, such as those in East and South Asia, the widespread practice of sex selection has resulted in skewed sex ratios with a higher number of boys than girls at birth. In contrast, in the United States, there is limited and inconclusive evidence that immigrants from these areas—or anywhere else—are obtaining sex-selective abortions in this country. Bans on sex-selective abortions place a burden on providers, who are forced to not only question all women’s reasons for seeking an abortion, but to also second-guess and stigmatize Asian-American women and communities. While disguised as a means to eliminate gender discrimination, these laws make abortion less accessible; they do not prohibit other sex selection methods, such as sperm sorting or preimplantation genetic diagnostics.

Arizona enacted legislation that prohibits a woman from aborting her fetus due to race, thereby focusing on the race of the woman having an abortion and placing the provider in a position of having to question her motivations. Antiabortion legislators and activists claim that abortion providers are targeting Latina and African-American women in their communities, relying on statistics showing that these women of color have higher rates of abortions than white women. In fact, six in 10 abortion providers are located in majority-white neighborhoods. Moreover, data show that women of color face higher rates of unintended pregnancies, which leads to higher rates of abortion (See Abortion and Women of Color: The Bigger Picture). 

In 2013, North Dakota was the first state to prohibit abortions in cases of fetal abnormality, even in cases where the fetus has a condition that is incompatible with life and will die before or soon after birth. Multiple states have implemented counseling requirements for women undergoing abortion to include information on perinatal hospice services.

Highlights

  • 10 states ban abortions for reason of sex selection at some point in pregnancy.

  • 3 states prohibit abortions for reasons of race.

  • 3 states prohibit abortions when the fetus may have a genetic anomaly.

    • 3 states require counseling on perinatal hospice services available before a woman may undergo an abortion if it may be due to a lethal fetal condition.

    • Kansas requires counseling on perinatal hospice services before any abortion may be performed.

Printer-friendly version

For more information

  • Public Policy Office

    202 296-4012
    [email protected]

Topic

United States

  • Abortion: Demographics, State Policies on Abortion

Geography

  • United States

Related Content

News in Context

Claim that Most Abortion Clinics Are Located in Black or Hispanic Neighborhoods Is False

Policy Analysis

A Problem-and-Solution Mismatch: Son Preference and Sex-Selective Abortion Bans

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Abortion and Women of Color: The Bigger Picture

Guttmacher Policy Review

Monthly State Policy Updates

Get an overview of state legislative and policy activity in all topics of sexual and reproductive health.

Learn More

 

Abortion Bans in Cases of Sex or Race Selection or Genetic Anomaly

STATE

PROHIBITS ABORTION IN CASE OF:

 

Sex Selection

Race Selection

Genetic Anomaly

Arizona

X

X

†

Arkansas

X

 

s

Illinois

▼*

 

 

Indiana

▼

▼

▼

Kansas

X

 

†

Kentucky

s

s

s

Louisiana

 

 

s

Minnesota

 
 
†

Mississippi

X X X

Missouri

X 

X

X

North Carolina

X

 

 

North Dakota

X

 

X

Ohio

 

 

s

Oklahoma

X

 

†

Pennsylvania

X

 

 

South Dakota

X

 

 

Tennessee

s s s

Utah

 

 

‡

TOTAL

10

3

3

▼ Enforcement permanently enjoined by court order; policy not in effect.
s Law is temporarily enjoined, policy is not in effect.
*  Illinois's ban applies after viability; in 1993, a federal court enjoined the portion of the bill that applies before viability.
†  Minnesota and Oklahoma require counseling on perinatal hospice services if an abortion is sought due to a lethal fetal abnormality. Arizona requires counseling about perinatal hospice services if an abortion is sought due to a lethal fetal abnormality, as well as counseling on outcomes for those living with the condition that the fetus is diagnosed with if the abortion is sought for a nonlethal fetal condition. Kansas requires counseling on perinatal hospice services before all abortions.

‡  Utah's ban will only take effect if a court decision allows states to ban abortion in these cases. 

 

Get updates on policy issues and more

Guttmacher Institute
Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?
Donate Now
Follow Guttmacher:

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Footer Menu

  • Privacy Policy
© 2020 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.

Get Our Updates