Skip to main content

Guttmacher Institute

Donate Now

Highlights

  • COVID-19 impact
  • IPSRH: Focus on Abortion
  • Adding It Up
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Asia
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • United States

Who We Are

  • About us
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship

Search form

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email
Guttmacher Institute

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Donate Now

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email

Highlights

  • COVID-19 impact
  • IPSRH: Focus on Abortion
  • Adding It Up
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Asia
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • United States

Who We Are

  • About us
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship

Search form

As of March 1, 2021 State Laws and Policies

Medicaid Family Planning Eligibility Expansions

Background

Since the mid-1990s, many states have expanded eligibility for Medicaid coverage of family planning services. Historically, states have expanded their programs by securing approval of a "waiver" of federal policy from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Most of the expansion states grant coverage for family planning solely on the basis of income to individuals not previously covered under Medicaid. A handful of states have received federal approval for more limited expansions that continue coverage for family planning for individuals who are leaving the Medicaid program. The passage of health care reform gave states a new and more expeditious option for expanding eligibility for family planning. Under this law, states may expand their programs by amending their state Medicaid plan. Unlike a waiver, which is time-limited, a State Plan Amendment is a permanent change to the state’s Medicaid program.

Visit our state legislation tracker for policy activity on all sexual and reproductive health topics.

Highlights

  • 26 states have federal approval to extend Medicaid eligibility for family planning services to individuals who would otherwise not be eligible. (Vermont operates a similar, but entirely state-funded program for the provision of family planning services. Iowa and Missouri also operate similar programs, but exclude abortion providers from their programs.)
    • 24 states provide family planning benefits to individuals based on income; most states set the income ceiling at or near 200% of poverty. 
    • 4 states provide family planning benefits for women losing full-benefit Medicaid coverage, either when their postpartum period ends (3 states) or for any reason (1 state).
  • 21 states provide family planning benefits to men and women.
  • 21 states include individuals who are younger than 19 years of age; 1 additional state includes 18 year olds but not younger individuals.
  • 17 states operate their programs through a State Plan Amendment; 9 states operate their programs under a waiver from the federal government.
Printer-friendly version

For more information

  • Public Policy Office

    202 296-4012
    [email protected]

Topic

United States

  • Contraception: Publicly Funded Family Planning, State Policies on Contraception

Geography

  • United States: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming

Related Content

Policy Analysis

Making Medicaid Managed Care Work for Family Planning Coverage and Services

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Beyond Preventing Unplanned Pregnancy: The Broader Benefits of Publicly Funded Family Planning Services

Guttmacher Policy Review
Report

Moving Forward: Family Planning in the Era of Health Reform

Policy Analysis

Pay-for-Performance: Making It Work for Safety-Net Family Planning Centers and the Clients They Serve

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Affordable Care Act Survives Supreme Court Test, But Medicaid Expansion Placed in Peril

Guttmacher Policy Review
Report

Medicaid Family Planning Expansions: Lessons Learned and Implications for the Future

Policy Analysis

The State of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights In the State of Texas: A Cautionary Tale

Guttmacher Policy Review

Medicaid Family Planning Eligibility Expansions

STATE

BASIS FOR ELIGIBILITY

ELIGIBLE POPULATION INCLUDES

ORGANIZED AS A:

WAIVER EXPIRATION DATE

Based Solely on Income

Losing Full-Benefit Coverage

Men

Individuals  <19

State Plan Amendment

Waiver

Alabama

146%†*

 

X

 

 

X

9/30/22

California

200%

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

Connecticut

263%†

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

Florida

 

For any reason

 

X

 

X

6/30/23

Georgia

200%*

 

 

‡

 

X

12/31/29

Indiana

146%†

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

IowaΨ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Louisiana

138%†

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

Maine

214%†

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

Maryland

259%*

 

X

X

X

 

 

Minnesota

200%

 

X

X

X

 

 

Mississippi

199%†*

 

X

X

 

X

12/31/27

MissouriΨ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Montana

216%†*

 

 

 

 

X

12/31/28

New Hampshire

201%†

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

New Jersey

205%

 

X

 

X

 

 

New Mexico

255%†

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

New York

223%†*

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

North Carolina

200%†

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

Oklahoma

138%†*

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

Oregon

250%

 

X

X

 

X

12/31/21

Pennsylvania

220%†

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

Rhode Island

 

Postpartum

 

X

 

X

12/31/23

South Carolina

199%†

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

Texas

200%

Postpartum

 

‡ 

 

X

12/31/24

VermontΨ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Virginia

205%†*

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

Washington

260%*

 

X

X

 

X

12/31/23

Wisconsin

306%†

 

X

X

X

 

N/A

Wyoming

 

Postpartum

 

 

 

X

12/31/27

TOTAL

24

4

21

21

17

10

 

*     State also extends Medicaid eligibility for family planning services to people losing full-benefit coverage after the end of the postpartum period.
†     This eligibility ceiling includes a standard “disregard” to an applicant’s income equal to five percentage points of the federal poverty level.
‡     Includes 18 year olds but not younger individuals.
Ψ    The state operates an entirely state-funded program to provide family planning services. In Iowa, individuals with incomes up to 300% of the federal poverty line (FPL) are eligible. In Missouri and Texas, women at least 18 years of age with incomes up to 185% of the FPL are eligible. In Missouri, women losing Medicaid postpartum are also eligible. In Vermont, anyone with an income up to 200% of the FPL is eligible.

 

 

Get updates on policy issues and more

THE TIME IS NOW

Stand up for sexual and reproductive health and rights.
We need your support.

Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?
Donate Now
Follow Guttmacher:

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Footer Menu

  • Privacy Policy
© 2021 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.

Get Our Updates