Image
2X MATCH: Stop Attacks on Bodily Autonomy. The fight for reproductive freedom has never been more urgent. Thanks to a limited-time 2X match offer, your gift today will have TWICE the impact. Help power critical research and policy advocacy to protect and advance reproductive health care worldwide. Double My Impact.
Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Policy Analysis
January 2006

States focused on reproductive health in 2005

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

State legislatures paid particular attention to reproductive health issues in 2005. A total of 98 new laws were enacted, just over half of which are aimed at restricting access to abortion. One-quarter seek to expand access to contraception.

In 2005, states enacted 52 measures that restrict access to abortion, including the following:

  • South Dakota adopted legislation that would immediately criminalize abortion in the event Roe v. Wade is overturned, becoming the fourth state with such a provision, joining Illinois, Kentucky and Louisiana;
  • Arkansas and Texas replaced existing statutes requiring that the parents of a minor seeking an abortion be notified with new laws mandating parental consent;
  • New parental notification mandates were enacted in Florida and Oklahoma, while Georgia and South Dakota modified existing provisions to make them more stringent;
  • Missouri passed legislation to prohibit helping a minor to cross state lines in order to circumvent the state’s parental notification requirement;
  • Seven states (Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Oklahoma and South Dakota) enacted mandatory counseling laws requiring that women obtaining an abortion be given specific information under the aegis of "informed consent"; and,
  • Eight states (Florida, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas) adopted or extended legislation authorizing funding for organizations that provide counseling on "alternatives to abortion" and services to pregnant women.

On the other hand, states enacted 22 measures designed to increase access to contraception in 2005, including the following:

  • Legislatures in Connecticut, Indiana, Massachusetts and Texas adopted measures directing the state to apply for federal permission to expand eligibility for Medicaid-funded family planning services;
  • Arkansas and West Virginia adopted laws requiring that private insurance plans in the state include coverage of contraceptives if they cover other prescription drugs;
  • Massachusetts and New Hampshire enacted laws permitting pharmacists to dispense emergency contraceptives without a prescription; a total of eight states now have such policies;
  • Massachusetts and New Jersey moved to require hospital emergency rooms to dispense emergency contraceptives to sexual assault victims on request, while Texas enacted a measure requiring that sexual assault victims be given information on treating sexually transmitted infections and preventing pregnancy, presumably including emergency contraceptives;
  • California enacted legislation and Illinois promulgated regulations designed to limit the ability of pharmacists to refuse to fill physicians’ prescriptions for contraceptives, including emergency contraceptives; and,
  • Governors in two states (Arizona and Wisconsin) vetoed legislation designed to expand the ability of pharmacists to refuse.

Click on the links below for more information.

Monthly updates on sexual and reproductive health developments in the states

The current status of state policies

Receive e-mail updates on state-oriented research and analysis by subscribing to State News Quarterly.

First published online: January 12, 2006

Share

Printer-friendly version

Tags

State Policy Trends

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.