Image
2X MATCH: Stop Attacks on Bodily Autonomy. The fight for reproductive freedom has never been more urgent. Thanks to a limited-time 2X match offer, your gift today will have TWICE the impact. Help power critical research and policy advocacy to protect and advance reproductive health care worldwide. Double My Impact.
Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Policy Analysis
April 2006

Reproductive Health in the State Legislatures January – March 2006

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

The first months of the 2006 state legislative sessions indicate that last year’s focus on reproductive health issues not only is continuing but may even be intensifying. On abortion alone, 44 measures have already passed at least one legislative chamber. Of these, only two bills— in Washington and Hawaii—are designed to protect access to abortion services. The remaining bills are designed to restrict access through a variety of approaches.

So far this year, legislators in 10 states (AL, GA, IN, KY, LA, MS, MO, OH, SD and TN) have introduced measures that would directly challenge Roe by banning virtually all abortions. In March, South Dakota enacted a measure (slated to go into effect in July) that would permit abortion only when the woman’s life is endangered. Although no legal challenge has been filed to date to block the law’s enforcement, a petition is circulating to put the issue before the voters in November. A similar measure passed both houses of the Mississippi legislature and died in a conference committee. (See Abortion Policy in the Absence of Roe.)

At the same time, legislators in other states are proposing legislation that would prohibit state interference with a woman’s right to choose abortion prior to viability or at anytime when the abortion is necessary to preserve the life or health of the woman. Measures along these lines have been introduced in four states (HI, MA, MN and NY). Of these only the Hawaii bill has seen further action; that measure was approved by the House and is pending before the full Senate.

As they did last year, legislators are again paying serious attention to the sexual health and rights of minors. So far this year, 171 measures relating to minors have been introduced in 40 states; of these 115 would restrict minors’ rights.

In March, Utah enacted a law that adds a requirement for parental consent for a minor seeking an abortion to its existing parental notice requirement. When the new Utah law goes into effect in May, the number of states with some sort of requirement for parental involvement will total 34, with 13 requiring notice and 22 requiring consent. (See Parental Involvement in Minors’ Abortions.)

Measures to restrict minor’s access to contraceptives have been seriously considered in both Arizona and New Hampshire. In Arizona, a measure to require that providers obtain parental consent before writing any prescription for a minor, including one for contraceptives, was approved by a legislative committee and is now being considered by the full House. A measure that would have specifically required parental consent for emergency contraception was defeated in New Hampshire after having been approved at the committee level.

Click on the links below for more information. Monthly updates on sexual and reproductive health and rights developments in the states

Current status of state policies

Click here to subscribe to State News Quarterly, an electronic newsletter containing updates on state-oriented research and analysis.

First published online: April 5, 2006

Share

Printer-friendly version

Tags

State Policy Trends

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.