Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Policy Analysis
August 2019

State Abortion Policy Landscape: From Hostile to Supportive

Authors

Elizabeth Nash, Guttmacher Institute

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Note: All counts refer to laws in effect as of December 30, 2020.

Our analysis of the state abortion policy landscape in the United States looks at the extent to which each state’s abortion policy environment demonstrates hostility to, or support of, abortion rights. We consider whether any of six types of abortion restrictions and any of six types of policies that support abortion rights and access are in effect (see below for specific policies). Based on the number of policies in each of these groups, a state is placed in one of seven classifications, ranging from very hostile to very supportive.

 

Hostile and Supportive States

  • 6 states are very hostile
  • 15 states are hostile
  • 8 states lean hostile
  • 5 states are middle-ground
  • 10 states lean supportive
  • 5 states are supportive
  • 1 state is very supportive

This policy landscape has changed over time. In 2010:

  • No states were very hostile
  • 10 states were hostile
  • 19 states leaned hostile
  • 9 states were middle-ground
  • 10 states leaned supportive
  • 2 states were supportive
  • No state was very supportive

And in 2000:

  • No states were very hostile
  • 4 states were hostile
  • 23 states leaned hostile
  • 11 states were middle-ground
  • 11 states leaned supportive
  • 1 state was supportive
  • No state was very supportive

 

 

 

U.S. Women of Reproductive Age (aged 13–44)

  • Currently, nearly 40 million U.S. women of reproductive age (58% of the total number) live in states that have demonstrated hostility to abortion rights. 
  • In contrast, 25.8 million women of reproductive age (almost 38% of the total) live in states that have demonstrated support for abortion rights.
  • 2.5 million women of reproductive age (nearly 4% of the total) live in middle-ground states.

As the policy landscape has shifted, so has the number of women living in different classifications of states.  

In 2010:

  • Nearly 38 million U.S. women of reproductive age (57% of the total number) lived in hostile states. 
  • Nearly 17 million women of reproductive age (25% of the total) lived in states considered to be supportive of abortion rights and access.
  • More than 11 million U.S. women of reproductive age (greater than 17% of the total) lived in middle-ground states.

In 2000:

  • Nearly 32 million U.S. women of reproductive age (49% of the total number) lived in hostile states. 
  • More than 16 million women of reproductive age (25% of the total) lived in states considered to be supportive of abortion rights and access.
  • Nearly 17 million women of reproductive age (26% of the total) lived in middle-ground states.

 

Methodological Notes

Data on U.S. women aged 13–44 are from the American Community Survey. States were scored based on whether they had policies in effect in any of six categories of abortion restrictions and any of six categories of measures that protect or expand abortion rights and access. Policies were not counted as in effect if they were blocked by court order (temporarily or permanently), or if the effective date had not yet been reached. (Until 2018, Guttmacher Institute analyses of the state abortion policy landscape included only abortion restrictions and considered 10 categories of restrictions. The six current categories consolidated some issue areas and scores cannot be directly compared with previous analyses.) Each state was given a score of 1 for every protective measure in effect and a score of -1 for every abortion restriction in effect. A state with a score of either positive or negative six has either all of the abortion restrictions or all of the protective measures in effect. A state with a score of -5, for example, has either five restrictions and no protective measures or a combination of six restrictions and one protective measure. 

A state is considered very hostile to abortion rights if it has all six abortion restrictions in effect. A state is considered hostile to abortion rights if it has a score of -4 or -5. A state is considered to be leaning hostile to abortion rights if it has a score of -2 or -3.

A state is considered very supportive if it has all six types of measures that expand or protect abortion rights and access in effect. It is considered supportive if it has a score of 4 or 5. A state is considered to be leaning supportive if it has a score of 2 or 3.

States scoring between 1 and -1 are considered middle-ground.

Six abortion restrictions:

  • Ban pre- or postviability abortions in violation of constitutional protections
  • Require in-person abortion counseling followed by a waiting period before the procedure (thereby requiring at least two trips to the facility)
  • Restrict Medicaid coverage for abortion
  • Prohibit the use of telemedicine to provide medication abortion
  • Limit access to abortion for those younger than 18 without parental involvement
  • Impose unnecessary and onerous abortion clinic regulations

Six protective policies:

  • Affirm a right to abortion in the state constitution
  • Establish a legal standard that protects access to abortion
  • Guarantee abortion coverage through Medicaid
  • Allow advanced practice clinicians to provide abortion by law or Attorney General Opinion
  • Mandate private health insurance plans cover abortion
  • Protect access to abortion clinics

See here for a spreadsheet detailing policies in effect for each state.

First published online: August 29, 2019

Share

Printer-friendly version

Additional Downloads

  • Hostile and Supportive State Abortion Laws hostile_supportive_states_updated_12-30-2020_as_of_date.pdf

Read More

Resource

State Policy Resources

Resource

Evidence You Can Use

Policy Analysis

State Policy Trends 2020: Reproductive Health and Rights in a Year Like No Other

Policy Analysis

Ensuring Access to Abortion at the State Level: Selected Examples and Lessons

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Flouting the Facts: State Abortion Restrictions Flying in the Face of Science

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

D&E Abortion Bans: The Implications of Banning the Most Common Second-Trimester Procedure

Guttmacher Policy Review
Fact Sheet

Abortion in the United States

Policy Analysis

In Real Life: Federal Restrictions on Abortion Coverage and the Women They Impact

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Coercion Is at the Heart of Social Conservatives’ Reproductive Health Agenda

Guttmacher Policy Review

Topic

United States

  • Abortion: Insurance Coverage, State Policies on Abortion

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

State Policy Trends, Hyde Amendment

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.