Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Health Services Research

How Health Insurance Instability Differentially Impedes Access to Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, by Race/Ethnicity and Nativity

Guttmacher logo

Authors

Hannah Olson, Guttmacher Institute Ayana Douglas-Hall, Guttmacher Institute Madeleine Haas, Guttmacher Institute Megan L. Kavanaugh, Guttmacher Institute
Objective

To document differential risk of insurance instability by race/ethnicity and nativity and investigate the effect of insurance instability on subsequent sexual and reproductive health care utilization and contraceptive access.

Study Setting and Design

We draw on data from the Surveys of Women (SoW), longitudinal household surveys conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin, weighted to reflect the population of women aged 18–44 in each state. SoW respondents included in this analysis were interviewed 2–4 times between 2018 and 2022 about their sexual and reproductive health-related experiences. We use race-stratified population averaged logistic regressions to model the risk of insurance churn and insurance loss for US-born vs. foreign-born people with the capacity for pregnancy, by race/ethnicity. Then, we use within-between (hybrid) logistic regressions to model the effect of insurance instability on subsequent sexual and reproductive health care utilization and contraceptive access outcomes, including receipt of any sexual and reproductive health care, receipt of contraceptive care, experiencing barriers to obtaining contraception, and contraceptive use.

Data Sources and Analytic Sample

Our analytic sample includes 12,208 observations from 4558 respondents between the ages of 18 and 44 who were assumed to have the capacity for pregnancy. Respondents were maintained in the sample if they were neither pregnant nor infertile and had non-missing information on key variables.

Principal Findings

Insurance loss was much more common among foreign-born compared to US-born people, particularly those who were racially or ethnically minoritized, with foreign-born BIPOC and foreign-born Hispanic respondents experiencing insurance loss 2.5 and 3 times as often as their US-born counterparts, respectively. Meanwhile, findings from our hybrid models suggest that losing insurance was associated with a five percentage point reduction in the probability of subsequent utilization of sexual and reproductive health care (∆p = −0.046, p < 0.05, SE = −0.02) and a five percentage point increase in the probability of experiencing subsequent barriers to obtaining preferred contraception (∆p = 0.053, p < 0.001, SE = 0.01).

Conclusion

The disproportionate burden of insurance instability among immigrant people of color may exacerbate barriers to sexual and reproductive health care and contraceptive access for a population that already experiences high barriers to obtaining this care relative to non-Hispanic White people.

First published on Health Services Research: October 7, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70049
Source / Available for Purchase
Read the full research article.

Share

Topic

United States

  • Abortion: Demographics, Insurance Coverage
  • Contraception

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

birth control
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.