Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
News Release
August 26, 2003

HPV Provisions in New U.S. Global Aids Law Have Potential to Undermine Condom Use in Sub-Saharan Africa in The Name Of Preventing Cervical Cancer

Death rates from cervical cancer remain high in developing countries because women lack access to Pap tests and other effective screening programs, not because of the high prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Genital HPV is an extremely common sexually transmitted infection worldwide, yet in countries where women receive timely screening and treatment, rates of cervical cancer are low. Nevertheless, the new U.S. global AIDS law requires an analysis of HPV prevalence and a study of the impact of condom use on the spread of HPV in Sub-Saharan Africa, ostensibly in order to reduce deaths from cervical cancer. According to "HPV in the United States and Developing Nations: A Problem of Public Health or Politics?" by Cynthia Dailard, the experience of the United States and other developed countries suggests that the law's focus on HPV prevalence is misplaced, and will serve only to undermine confidence in condoms without doing anything to bring poor women the services they need to combat cervical cancer.

There are approximately 5.5 million new HPV infections in the United States each year, representing one-third of all new sexually transmitted infections. Nearly 3 in 4 Americans aged 15-49 have been infected at some point in their lives. Although most HPV infections are transient, women occasionally develop persistent infections. With certain strains of HPV (a few of the many types identified), these persistent infections may lead to cervical cancer.

Despite high rates of HPV infection, cervical cancer is relatively rare in the United States because of the widespread availability of Pap tests, and represents just one percent of all cancer deaths among women. Pap tests can detect precancerous changes of cervical cells and allow for the removal of affected tissue before invasive cancer sets in. Globally, however, it remains the third most common cancer, and 225,000 women die of the disease each year. Almost eighty-five percent of these deaths occur among women in developing countries where cervical screening programs are often unavailable.

Proponents of the focus on HPV in the U.S. global AIDS law contend that because genital HPV is spread through skin-to-skin contact and thus cannot be entirely prevented by condom use, only abstinence until marriage and lifelong monogamy within marriage can protect women against HPV and death from cervical cancer. The experience of the United States and other developed countries refutes this assertion. Moreover, latex condoms are scientifically proven to be an effective barrier against other sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. Using HPV as a means to undermine global confidence in condoms places men and women at tremendous risk of contracting a number of diseases, and does not address the problem at hand--a lack of access to cervical cancer screening among the world's poorest women.

Dailard's analysis appears in the August issue of The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy. Other analyses in this issue include:

Printer-friendly version

Share

Media Contact

  • Rebecca Wind

    Guttmacher Institute
    212 248 1953
    media@guttmacher.org
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.