Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
News Release
September 22, 2014

In Bangladesh, Unsafe Abortion is Common Despite Availability of Safer Pregnancy Termination Procedure

Also in this issue of International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health :

"Pregnancy Termination in Matlab, Bangladesh: Trends And Correlates of Use of Safer and Less-Safe Methods," by Julie DaVanzo and Mizanur Rahman

"Repeat Use of Emergency Contraceptive Pills In Urban Kenya and Nigeria," by Dawn Chin-Quee, Kelly L’Engle, Conrad Otterness, Sarah Mercer and Mario Chen

"Fertility Decisions and Contraceptive Use at Different Stages of Relationships: Windows of Risk Among Men And Women in Accra," by Ivy Frances Osei, Susannah Harding Mayhew, Leticia Biekro, Martine Collumbien and the ECAF Team

"Contraceptive Method Skew and Shifts in Method Mix In Low- and Middle-Income Countries," by Jane T. Bertrand, Tara M. Sullivan, Ellen A. Knowles, Muhammad F. Zeeshan and James D. Shelton

Menstrual regulation, a procedure that uses manual vacuum aspiration to safely establish nonpregnancy after a missed period, has been part of Bangladesh’s national family planning program since 1979. It is legally allowed up to 10 weeks after a woman’s last period, and thus some women use it to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Despite the availability of this service, hundreds of thousands of women in Bangladesh have abortion procedures that endanger their health. A new study, "Pregnancy Termination in Matlab, Bangladesh: Maternal Mortality Risks Associated with Menstrual Regulation and Abortion," by Mizanur Rahman, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, et al., found that in the period 2000–2008 a woman was more likely to die from complications of an unsafe abortion than from childbirth, whereas the risks of death from undergoing menstrual regulation and from giving birth were similar.

The study analyzed demographic surveillance data on pregnancy outcomes from the rural district of Matlab to assess mortality risks associated with menstrual regulation, abortion and delivery. Matlab is representative of most rural areas in Bangladesh, where the availability of traditional practitioners who provide unsafe abortions is greater than that of formally trained health care providers who provide safer but more expensive menstrual regulation procedures. In addition, the analysis compared data from one area within Matlab that receives standard government health and family planning services to another area that receives higher quality services through a special program called the Maternal and Child Health–Family Planning (MCH-FP) program.

The study found significant declines in women’s risk of dying from either unsafe abortion or menstrual regulation over time. Overall, for women in Matlab in 1989–1999, the odds of dying from complications of unsafe abortion were 12 times those of dying from childbirth and the odds of dying from complications of menstrual regulation were four times those of dying from childbirth. By 2000–2008, however, the odds of dying from complications of an unsafe abortion were five times those of dying from childbirth, and the odds of dying from complications of a menstrual regulation procedure were no greater than those of dying from childbirth. Notably, the decrease in maternal mortality risk between the two periods was greater in the MCH-FP area than in the area that received standard government services.

In all of Matlab, the proportion of pregnancy terminations by unsafe abortion decreased while the proportion by menstrual regulation increased over time: Menstrual regulation accounted for 55% of terminations done in 1989–1999 and 79% of those done in 2000–2008. The researchers suggest that this increase, the growing safety of both menstrual regulation and abortion procedures, and the earlier termination of unwanted pregnancies contributed to the overall reduction in maternal mortality observed during this period.

The researchers note, however, that despite these improvements, too many women still have to resort to abortion methods that put their life and health at risk. They recommend finding ways to reduce women’s use of unsafe abortion, such as addressing the reasons and conditions that lead women to turn to such methods.

"Pregnancy Termination in Matlab, Bangladesh: Maternal Mortality Risks Associated with Menstrual Regulation and Abortion," by Mizanur Rahman, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, et al., is currently available online from International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health.

Printer-friendly version

Share

Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.